BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 766


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 27, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          766 (Ridley-Thomas) - As Amended April 27, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Health                         |Vote:|19 - 0       |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill requires the Department of Public Health (DPH) to give  
          preference to schools with a high percentage of children and  
          youth who receive free or low-cost health coverage through  
          Medi-Cal or Covered California when developing a request for  








                                                                     AB 766


                                                                    Page  2





          proposal (RFP) for grant funding for Public School Health Center  
          Support Programs 


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          Negligible state fiscal effect. This grant program is currently  
          not funded.


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. According to the author, children from lower  
            socioeconomic backgrounds have poorer health outcomes.  These  
            health disparities are due, in part, to barriers in accessing  
            medical care and using primary care services.  Recent  
            expansions in insurance coverage have improved access to  
            health care for this population.  Yet, even with the expansion  
            of health insurance, children from low-income households are  
            not guaranteed access to health care services.  The author  
            concludes that SBHCs provide a health care delivery model that  
            can help to address some of the barriers to health care  
            services that insured children from low-income households  
            face.  
          


          2)Related Legislation. SB 118 (Liu) renames the Public School  
            Health Center Support Program the School-Based Health and  
            Education Partnership Program and makes changes to the  
            requirements and funding levels.  Creates a new type of grant  
            to fund interventions related to obesity, asthma, alcohol and  
            substance abuse, and mental health.  SB 118 is pending a  
            hearing in the Senate Appropriations Committee.











                                                                     AB 766


                                                                    Page  3





          3)Support. Health advocacy groups, including the California Pan  
            Ethnic Health Network and the California Black Health Network,  
            support this bill, stating it will provide health care to  
            California's most vulnerable students.



          4)Opposition.  The California Right to Life Committee (CRLC)  
            states in opposition that CRLC must continue to oppose any  
            publicly funded program which advocates and promotes abortions  
            and related services.
        





          Analysis Prepared by:Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081