BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 769


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 22, 2015 


           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, RETIREMENT, AND SOCIAL  
                                      SECURITY


                                  Rob Bonta, Chair


          AB 769  
          (Jones-Sawyer) - As Introduced February 25, 2015


          SUBJECT:  State employees:  disciplinary action


          SUMMARY:  Requires that any adverse action taken against a state  
          employee for any cause for discipline, other than for fraud,  
          embezzlement, or the falsification of records, be served, and  
          the investigation completed, within one year after the cause of  
          discipline arose.  





          EXISTING LAW:  





          1)Authorizes an appointing power to take adverse action against  
            a state employee for specified causes, and establishes  
            administrative procedures for review of an adverse action by  
            the State Personnel Board.










                                                                     AB 769


                                                                    Page  2






          2)Requires notice of any adverse action against a state employee  
            for any cause for discipline based on any civil service law be  
            served within three years of the cause for discipline.



          3)Specifies that in cases of fraud, embezzlement, or  
            falsification of records, notice must be served within three  
            years after the discovery of the activity.



          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown.


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, "Currently, investigations  
          against employees can be extended up to three years after  
          discovery of an incident.  This lengthy timeframe causes a delay  
          in action against improper or illegal behavior by employees,  
          disruption of the workplace, and unnecessary costs from  
          administrative leave or back pay.  Moreover, as time passes, the  
          integrity of the investigation decreases as witnesses' memories  
          fade, evidence is lost and many of the individuals involved move  
          on to new careers and/or locations.  Such circumstances  
          ultimately costs the state thousands of dollars in litigation  
          and lost productivity each year.  By the time any investigation  
          has been borne out, the damage has already been done.   
          Therefore, it is vital that California streamline this process  
          to ensure investigations happen as promptly and thoroughly as  
          possible."





          The author concludes, "This bill streamlines the process for  
          investigating employees accused of wrongdoing to ensure it is  
          conducted as efficiently and timely as possible.  This measure  








                                                                     AB 769


                                                                    Page  3





          does not change the current statute of limitations for cases of  
          fraud, embezzlement or falsification of records."  





          This bill is similar to AB 811 (Salas) of this session.  AB 811  
          requires that any adverse action taken against a state employee  
          for any cause for discipline be served within one year after the  
          discovery of the cause for discipline first arose.  





          This bill is also similar to the introduced version of AB 1783  
          (Jones-Sawyer) of last year, which passed out of this Committee  
          on a 5 to 1 vote.  The bill was later amended to delete these  
          provisions and to instead continue to exempt certain public  
          transit workers from the requirements of the Public Employees'  
          Pension Reform Act.





          Similar provisions were also contained in numerous bills that  
          attempted to implement a bill of rights for public employees.   
          Those bills include: AB 872 (Dickinson) of 2013, AB 1655  
          (Dickinson) of 2012, AB 920 (Portantino) of 2011, AB 1744  
          (Portantino) of 2010.  All of these bills were held in the  
          Assembly Appropriations Committee.





          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:








                                                                     AB 769


                                                                    Page  4









          Support


          Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 (Co-Sponsor)


          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees  
          (Co-Sponsor)


          Association of California State Supervisors


          California Association of Highway Patrolmen


          California Association of Psychiatric Technicians


          California Correctional Peace Officers Association


          California Correctional Supervisors Organization


          California Immigrant Policy Center




          Opposition


          None on file 









                                                                     AB 769


                                                                    Page  5








          Analysis Prepared by:Karon Green / P.E.,R., & S.S. / (916)  
          319-3957