Amended in Senate August 18, 2015

Amended in Senate July 1, 2015

Amended in Assembly April 27, 2015

Amended in Assembly April 6, 2015

Amended in Assembly March 19, 2015

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly Bill No. 770

Introduced by Assembly Member Irwin

February 25, 2015

An act to amend Section 88810 of, and to add Section 88807 to, the Education Code, relating to community colleges.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 770, as amended, Irwin. Community colleges: basic skills innovation program.

Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges, under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law authorizes the establishment of community college districts under the administration of community college governing boards, and authorizes these districts to provide instruction at community college campuses throughout the state.

Existing law establishes a financial and professional development grant funding program, which authorizes the governing board of a community college district to apply to the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges for, and requires the chancellor to distribute, multiyear financial and professional development grant funding to community colleges within the district. Existing law requires colleges receiving these funds to adopt or expand the use of evidence-based models of academic assessment and placement, remediation, and student support that accelerate the progress of underprepared students toward achieving postsecondary educational and career goals, as specified. Existing law requires recipient community colleges to report specified information to the chancellor’s office on program outcomes. Existing law begin delete requires end delete begin insert makes end insert the chancellor’s office begin delete to be end delete responsible for administering the grant program and distributing and monitoring awards to recipient community college districts, developing application criteria, administrative guidelines, and other requirements for purposes of administering the grant program, and providing the information submitted by community college districts to the Legislative Analyst’s Office. Existing law requires the Legislative Analyst’s Office to report to the Legislature on the progress of the grant program in achieving its prescribed purpose, as specified.

This bill would require a community college district, in order to receive grant funding, to submit a plan to the Office of the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges that details the strategy of a college or colleges within the district for achieving the goals of the program. begin insert The bill would require a district to specify in the plan, at a minimum, the number of students to be served, strategies to be employed, and projected results for the plan’s implementation. end insert The bill would begin delete establish end delete begin insert also require the chancellor’s office to determine end insert levels of funding to be awarded to grant begin delete recipients and would set aside $3,000,000 of the funds appropriated for the program to be used to provide technical assistance to end delete begin insert recipients, and would authorize the chancellor’s office to contract with technical assistance providers to assist applicant and end insert recipient colleges in begin insert developing and end insert implementing these evidence-based models of academic assessment and placement, remediation, and student support, as specified.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1.  

Section 88807 is added to the Education Code,
to read:

88807.  

In order to receive a grant pursuant to this part, a
community college district shall submit a plan to the Office of the
Chancellor of the California Community Colleges that details the
strategy of a college or colleges within the district for achieving
the goals of the grant program. begin insert A district shall specify in the plan,
at a minimum, the number of students to be served, strategies to
be employed, and projected results of the plan’s implementation. end insert

SEC. 2.  

Section 88810 of the Education Code is amended to
read:

88810.  

(a) In order to receive a grant, the governing board of
a community college district shall demonstrate in its application
for funding, consistent with subdivision (b) of Section 88805, that
the community colleges that are to participate in the grant program
will redesign their curriculum, career pathways, assessment and
placement procedures, or any combination thereof, to implement,
or significantly expand the use or application of, two or more of
the following evidence-based practices and principles:

(1) Adopting placement tests or other student assessment
indicators and related policies that may include multiple measures
of student performance, including grades in high school courses,
especially overall grade point average, results from the common
assessment system, and input from counselors.

(2) Increasing the placement of students directly in gateway
English and mathematics courses that are transferable to the
University of California or the California State University and
career pathways, with remedial instruction integrated as appropriate
for underprepared students.

(3) Aligning content in remedial courses with the students’
programs of academic or vocational study to target students’ actual
needs and increase relevance. This paragraph is intended to
encourage the development of remedial instruction focused on a
student’s identified academic need informed by the student’s
intended course of study.

(4) Contextualizing remedial instruction in foundational skills
for the industry cluster, pathways, or both, in which the student
seeks to advance.

(5) Providing proactive student support services that are
integrated with the instruction provided.

(6) Developing two- and three-course sequences, as appropriate,
for completion of a college-level English or mathematics course,
or both, for underprepared students, by either utilizing technology,
where appropriate, to enhance the adoption of the high impact
practices specified in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, or
implementing other effective basic skills course strategies and
practices not specified in paragraphs (1) to (5), inclusive, subject
to the college providing evidence that substantiates the practice is
effective.

(b) Community colleges are encouraged to collaborate with
local school districts serving kindergarten and grades 1 to 12,
inclusive, to better articulate English and math instruction between
the high schools and the community colleges.

(c) Each participating community college shall be responsible
for all of the following:

(1) Developing a plan based on two or more of the
evidence-based principles and practices described in subdivision
(a) that demonstrates a clear strategy for ensuring that both of the
following occur within a five-year period:

(A) A progressively increasing share of the students who enroll
at participating community colleges within the community college
district achieve the goals listed in subdivision (b) of Section 88805.

(B) A significantly greater share of entering students who are
enrolled at the community college achieve the goals listed in
subdivision (b) of Section 88805 within a shorter time period than
before the implementation of the plan at the community college.

(2) Ensuring that the plan developed pursuant to paragraph (1)
does all the following:

(A) Describes the community college’s current practices with
regard to the selected high impact practices and its readiness to
implement the new interventions.

(B) Articulates targets for the share of entering students
projected to be served by these interventions over the three-year
implementation period.

(C) Sets goals for the share of entering students who complete
a college-level English or mathematics course within three
semesters or less after enrollment.

(D) Identifies key strategies and implementation benchmarks
for evaluating the progress of campus efforts to implement the
selected interventions.

(E) Details the number of campus faculty likely to be involved
in all selected high impact interventions and the plan for addressing
their professional and technical assistance needs.

(3) Ensuring that its faculty participate in professional
development regarding academic programs or new curriculum
developed or expanded pursuant to the plan, using grant funds to
support that faculty participation.

(4) Commencing in the year that a community college receives
a grant and for the following three fiscal years, annually reporting
to the chancellor’s office on program outcomes, disaggregated by
the demographic characteristics, high school grade point average,
and initial placement level of its students, for purposes of
measuring progress compared to the community college’s
performance before its implementation of the plan. These reports
should include all of the following:

(A) The total number and percentage of entering students
identified as underprepared before receipt of the grant.

(B) The number and percentage of entering students served by
the grant program, disaggregated by type of practice implemented.

(C) The number and percentage of entering students achieving
the goals listed in subdivision (b) of Section 88805.

(D) The number of faculty involved and faculty needs regarding
the adoption and operation of courses under the plan.

(E) If applicable, a narrative describing any subsequent
adjustments to the design of the college’s basic skills course
practices or strategies adopted pursuant to paragraph (6) of
subdivision (a).

(F) A description of any additional or expanded student supports
offered.

(G) A narrative describing the community college’s efforts to
collaborate with local school districts serving kindergarten and
grades 1 to 12, inclusive, to better articulate English and math
instruction between the high schools and the community colleges.

(5) Developing the plan in consultation with campus faculty.

(d) The office of the Chancellor of the California Community
Colleges shall be responsible for all of the following:

(1) Developing application criteria, administrative guidelines,
and other requirements for purposes of administering the grant
program. Applications that would do one or both of the following
shall be given priority consideration within the application criteria:

(A) Scale up existing practices.

(B) Provide services to greater proportions of students.

begin insert

(2) Determining the level of funding to be awarded to a recipient
community college district based upon the scope and complexity
of the work proposed in its plan submitted pursuant to Section
88807, as evidenced by the number of students to be served,
strategies to be employed, and projected results of the plan’s
implementation.

end insert begin delete

(2)

end delete

begin insert ( end insert begin insert 3) end insert  Administering the grant program and distributing and
monitoring awards to recipient community college districts.

begin insert

(4) Consulting with internal and external stakeholders for the
purpose of advising on the creation and composition of a team of
technical assistance providers to assist a community college in
the development and implementation of its plan pursuant to
subdivision (c).

end insert begin insert

(A) Stakeholders shall include, but not be limited to,
representatives from college campuses, faculty, administrators,
and other experts with experience implementing evidence-based
practices that accelerate students’ completion of basic skills
courses.

end insert begin insert

(B) Technical assistance providers shall have demonstrated
that they have expertise in the development, or implementation,
or both, of the evidence-based practices outlined in subdivision
(a).

end insert begin insert

(C) The chancellor’s office may contract with identified
technical assistance providers to provide assistance in the
development and implementation of plans by applicant and
recipient community college districts.

end insert begin delete

(3)

end delete

begin insert (5) end insert  Providing the information submitted pursuant to paragraph
(4) of subdivision (c) to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.

(e) (1) The Legislative Analyst’s Office shall aggregate,
analyze, and report the information submitted pursuant to paragraph
(3) of subdivision (d) to the Legislature on the progress of the grant
program in achieving its prescribed purpose. The Legislative
Analyst’s Office shall issue an interim report by December 1, 2019,
and a final report by December 1, 2021.

(2) (A) The requirement for submitting a report imposed under
this subdivision is inoperative on July 1, 2026, pursuant to Section
10231.5 of the Government Code.

(B) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be
submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
Code.

begin delete

(f) (1) Two levels of funding shall be awarded to grant
recipients as follows:

(A) A recipient college that has no evidence-based practices as
specified in subdivision (a) in place, as of the date of its initial
award, that plans to implement two or more evidence-based
practices for the first time shall receive five hundred thousand
dollars ($500,000).

(B) A recipient college that has at least one evidence-based
practice as specified in subdivision (a) in place, as of the date of
its initial award, that plans to scale up one or more of these
evidence-based practices, or implement at least one additional
evidence-based practice for the first time, or both, provided that
at least two evidence-based practices shall be implemented or
scaled up with these funds, shall receive seven hundred fifty
thousand dollars ($750,000).

(2) Recipient colleges are strongly encouraged to implement
additional evidence-based practices specified in subdivision (a).

(3) Depending on the availability of funding, a college that
receives a grant may submit plans to scale up one or more of its
implemented evidence-based practices to receive funds for years
two or three, or both, following the implementation of the plan
described in subdivision (c). Grant priority shall be given to
colleges that have yet to receive funding.

(g) (1) Three million dollars ($3,000,000) of the funds
appropriated pursuant to this part shall be set aside statewide for
technical assistance to be provided by content experts who are
selected through a proposal process, as developed by the
chancellor’s office, that ensures the identification of appropriate
experts who shall provide technical assistance to recipient colleges
in the following areas:

(A) Improving student placement using multiple measures in
accordance with paragraph (1) of subdivision (a).

(B) Contextualizing remedial instruction in foundational skills
for the industry cluster, pathways, or both, in which the student
seeks to advance.

(C) Developing and offering effective and shortened English
and mathematics remedial course sequences as described in
paragraph (6) of subdivision (a).

(2) Technical assistance under paragraph (1) shall help colleges
achieve the following goals:

(A) Improving the accuracy of student placement.

(B) Placing as many students as appropriate directly in gateway
English and mathematics courses that are transferable to the
University of California or the California State University and
career pathways, with remedial instruction integrated as appropriate
for underprepared students.

(C) Helping students complete college-level English or
mathematics within a two or three course sequence.

(D) Providing proactive student supports.

(3) Technical assistance as described in this subdivision shall
be provided during the first three years that a grant recipient college
implements the plan specified in subdivision (c), with emphasis
placed on the first year of implementation. A recipient college or
college district may use grant funds to purchase additional technical
assistance, as appropriate.

end delete