BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                             Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair
                            2015 - 2016  Regular  Session

          AB 802 (Williams) - Public utilities: energy efficiency savings.
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Version: June 22, 2015          |Policy Vote: E., U., & C. 9 - 0 |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Urgency: No                     |Mandate: No                     |
          |                                |                                |
          |--------------------------------+--------------------------------|
          |                                |                                |
          |Hearing Date: August 17, 2015   |Consultant: Marie Liu           |
          |                                |                                |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File. 


          Bill  
          Summary:  AB 802 would require the California Public Utilities  
          Commission (CPUC) to authorize an electrical or gas corporation  
          to recover in rates financial incentives and support given to  
          customers to increase the energy efficiency of existing  
          buildings based on all energy savings and use reductions, even  
          those measures that bring an existing building into conformity  
          with Title 24 building code standards for new buildings.


          Fiscal  
          Impact:  
           Unknown costs, but likely in the low millions of dollars, to  
            the Public Utilities Reimbursement Account (special), for  
            additional staff at the CPUC to oversee, evaluate, and review  
            the energy efficiency program. 
           Unknown costs, but potentially in the millions of dollars, to  
            the General Fund and various special funds to the state as a  
            ratepayer of investor-owned utilities for additional energy  
            efficiency program costs.







          AB 802 (Williams)                                      Page 1 of  
          ?
          
          


          Background:  Existing law requires that the state's energy needs first be  
          met by increasing energy efficiency under the "loading order."  
          Consistent with the loading order, existing law requires  
          electric and gas investor-owned utilities (IOUs) to meet unmet  
          resources with all available energy efficiency and demand  
          reduction that is cost-effective, reliable, and feasible. To  
          achieve these targets, the IOUs administer energy efficiency  
          programs with ratepayer funds approved by the CPUC. Currently,  
          ratepayers pay for approximately $1 billion for financial  
          incentives, loans, and rebates for installing energy efficient  
          appliances, lighting, windows, HVAC systems, whole-house  
          retrofits, and sector-specific efforts.
          Under the CPUC's existing rules, the IOU's energy savings is  
          calculated against a baseline, which is based on (1) "natural  
          occurring savings," (2) standard industry practice, and (3)  
          Title 24 energy efficiency standards for existing buildings.  
          Thus, when the energy efficiency project involves an existing  
          building, the actual energy efficiency savings could actually be  
          higher, perhaps substantially higher, than the savings over the  
          baseline.


          Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations establishes  
          building standards for energy efficiency. They were first  
          adopted in 1978 and are currently updated approximately every  
          three years. The standards are developed by the California  
          Energy Commission (CEC) and are applied when a building permit  
          is issued. 




          Proposed Law:  
            This bill would require the CPUC in a separate or existing  
          proceeding, by July 1, 2016, to authorize an electrical or gas  
          corporation to recover in rates the costs from financial  
          incentives and support given to customers to increase the energy  
          efficiency of existing buildings based on all estimated energy  
          savings and energy usage reductions, including those savings or  
          reductions that are a result of brining an existing building  
          into compliance with the requirements of Title 24 building code  
          standards.








          AB 802 (Williams)                                      Page 2 of  
          ?
          
          


          Staff  
          Comments:  This bill would dramatically increase the number of  
          projects that are seen as cost effective, and therefore could  
          increase the CPUC's energy efficiency budget from approximately  
          $1 billion to approximately $3.3 billion. The CPUC estimates  
          that it would need between 12 and 24 new positions at an annual  
          cost of $1.4-$2.8 million dollars. The new positions would be  
          required to alter many of its documents, databases, and studies  
          that are used to guide energy efficiency policy within the CPUC.  
          Additionally, the CPUC anticipates needing to review a large  
          number of new efficiency pilot programs. 
          The state is a ratepayer of electricity and gas. To the extent  
          that the additional energy efficiency budget results in  
          increased ratepayer costs, this bill would have additional costs  
          to the state. Given that the CPUC estimates that the energy  
          efficiency budget might grow to $3.3 billion under this bill,  
          state ratepayer costs could be in the millions of dollars.




                                      -- END --