BILL ANALYSIS Ó
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 802|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 802
Author: Williams (D)
Amended: 6/22/15 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE ENERGY, U. & C. COMMITTEE: 9-0, 7/13/15
AYES: Hueso, Cannella, Hertzberg, Hill, Lara, Leyva, McGuire,
Pavley, Wolk
NO VOTE RECORDED: Fuller, Morrell
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 6-0, 8/27/15
AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bates
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 6/2/15 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT: Public utilities: energy efficiency savings
SOURCE: Pacific Gas and Electric Company
DIGEST: This bill allows an electrical corporation or gas
corporation to recover in rates the cost of programs to bring a
building up to legal code and to count all energy savings
achieved toward the corporation's energy efficiency targets.
ANALYSIS:
Existing law:
1)Establishes a charge on electricity and natural gas
consumption to fund cost-effective energy efficiency and
AB 802
Page 2
conservation activities. (Public Utilities Code §§381 and
890)
1)Requires electric corporation procurement plans to first meet
unmet resource needs through all available energy efficiency,
and demand reduction resources that are cost effective,
reliable, and feasible. (Public Utilities Code §§454.5
(b)(9)(C))
2)Requires the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to
identify all potentially achievable cost-effective electricity
and natural gas efficiency savings and to establish energy
efficiency procurement targets and ratepayer-funded programs
for electrical and gas corporations. Requires a gas
corporation to first meet its unmet resource needs through all
available natural gas efficiency and demand reduction
resources that are cost effective, reliable, and feasible.
(Public Utilities Code §§454.55 and 454.56.)
2)Requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to develop a
statewide estimate of all potentially achievable
cost-effective electricity and natural gas savings, establish
targets for statewide annual energy efficiency savings, and
demand reduction for the next 10-year period. (Public
Resources Code §25310)
3)Requires the CEC to develop and implement a comprehensive
program to achieve greater energy savings in California's
existing residential and nonresidential building stock.
(Public Resources Code §25943)
This bill:
1)Requires the CPUC, by July 1, 2016, to authorize electrical
corporations or gas corporations to recover from ratepayers
the cost of energy efficiency programs based on all estimated
energy savings, including energy savings from bringing
existing buildings into compliance with mandatory energy
efficiency codes for existing buildings issued by the CEC.
2)States that the CPUC may adjust the energy efficiency
procurement targets to reflect energy efficiency savings
AB 802
Page 3
achieved in meeting or exceeding mandatory energy efficiency
codes for existing buildings.
3)Requires the CPUC to prioritize energy efficiency activities
consistent with existing statute governing electrical
corporations' and gas corporations' energy efficiency
activities.
4)States that the requirements of this bill do not require the
CPUC to increase funding for the electrical or gas
corporations' energy efficiency programs.
Background
Energy efficiency atop the load. The "loading order" guides the
state's energy policies and decisions according to the following
order of priority: (1) decreasing energy demand by increasing
energy efficiency; (2) responding to energy demand by reducing
energy usage during peak hours; (3) meeting new energy
generation needs with renewable resources; and (4) meeting new
energy generation needs with clean fossil-fueled generation.
This policy has been adopted by the energy agencies - the CEC
and CPUC - and its principles guide all energy programs.
Consistent with the loading order, statute requires both
electric and gas investor-owned utilities (IOUs) to meet unmet
resource needs with all available energy efficiency and demand
reduction that is cost-effective, reliable and feasible. The
CPUC uses these criteria to establish energy efficiency targets
for the IOUs. To achieve these targets, the IOUs (and, in some
cases, community choice aggregators) administer energy
efficiency programs with ratepayer funds approved by the CPUC.
Currently funded at about $1 billion per year, the programs
include a portfolio of financial incentives, loans, and rebates
for installing energy efficient appliances, lighting, windows,
HVAC systems, whole-house retrofits, and sector-specific
efforts.
Setting the bar high. According to existing CPUC rules, each
IOU claims credit for energy savings from the portfolio of
energy efficiency measures in its energy efficiency program.
The CPUC evaluates the claimed energy savings and, after
adjustment, authorizes financial rewards for the IOU.
AB 802
Page 4
The CPUC measures claimed savings against a baseline, which the
CPUC generally defines as being comprised of three factors: (1)
"naturally occurring savings," (2) standard industry practice
and (3) the CEC's Title 24 energy efficiency standards for
existing buildings. The CPUC sets the baseline at this level to
avoid "free ridership," that is, credit for energy savings that
would have occurred absent the IOUs' energy efficiency programs.
Currently, the CPUC assumes that measures to bring an existing
building into compliance with CEC's energy efficiency standard
would have occurred absent the IOUs' energy efficiency programs.
(See figure below.)
Recently, some parties have complained that the CPUC-established
baseline of energy efficiency measures prevents realization of
additional, cost-effective energy savings. This is because the
baseline prevents the IOUs from receiving ratepayer monies for
encouraging energy-saving building measures that fall below
CEC's energy efficiency building standards. In fact, Pacific
AB 802
Page 5
Gas and Electric (PG&E), this bill's sponsor, reports the
results of two studies - both commissioned by PG&E and, as yet,
not reviewed by an independent third party - that show that most
potential cost-effective energy efficiency savings are
represented by projects that are below the CEC's building code
standards. PG&E, and others, contend that the state will not be
able to attain the ambitious energy efficiency goals currently
contemplated by the Legislature unless the CPUC credits the IOUs
with the energy savings that result from below-code projects.
Proponents additionally contend that the most cost-effective
energy efficiency projects are those below the energy efficiency
building standards.
Pilot projects under way. The CPUC has ordered the IOUs to
implement pilot projects in which the IOUs may receive rate
recovery and credit for energy savings resulting from below-code
energy efficiency building upgrades. The IOUs anticipate
implementing measures pursuant to the pilot projects over the
next two years; analysis of results will not be complete until
2018.
In addition to the pilot projects, the CPUC is conducting a
proceeding on energy efficiency. The hearing entails
consideration of CPUC's setting of the energy use baseline
against which the energy savings of the IOUs' energy efficiency
programs are measured. Inherent to that consideration is
evaluation of the specific proposal advanced by this bill,
namely, allowing the IOUs to receive credit for energy savings
resulting from below-code energy efficiency building upgrades.
Claiming versus counting. This bill requires the CPUC to
authorize an IOU to count all energy savings achieved toward
overall energy efficiency goals or targets established by the
commission. This requirement departs from existing practice, by
which an IOU claims energy savings from energy efficiency
measures and the CPUC assesses and adjusts those claims.
Related Legislation
AB 1330 (Bloom, 2015) establishes an energy efficiency resources
standard. The bill is currently under consideration by the
Senate Floor.
AB 1094 (Williams, 2015) authorizes the CEC to analyze energy
AB 802
Page 6
consumption of plug-in equipment and set energy efficiency
targets and require the CPUC to work with the CEC to address
electricity consumption by plug-in equipment. The bill was held
in the Assembly Committee on Appropriations.
SB 350 (De León, 2015) enacts the Clean Energy and Pollution
Reduction Act of 2015. The bill is currently under
consideration by the Assembly Floor.
FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal
Com.:YesLocal: No
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
Unknown costs, but likely in the low millions of dollars, to
the Public Utilities Reimbursement Account (special), for
additional staff at the CPUC to oversee, evaluate, and review
the energy efficiency program.
Unknown costs, but potentially in the millions of dollars, to
the General Fund and various special funds to the state as a
ratepayer of investor-owned utilities for additional energy
efficiency program costs.
SUPPORT: (Verified8/28/15)
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (source)
Bay Area Regional Energy Network
California Building Industry Association
California Business Properties Association
California State Association of Electrical Workers
California State Pipeline Trades Council
City of Santa Monica
Coalition of California Utility Employees
Environmental Defense Fund
Local Government Sustainable Energy Coalition
Marin Clean Energy
National Association of Energy Service Companies
Natural Resources Defense Council
Northern California Power Agency
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
Sempra Energy utilities
Sierra Club California
AB 802
Page 7
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas Company
The Energy Coalition
Union of Concerned Scientists
Western States Council of Sheet Metal Workers
OPPOSITION: (Verified8/28/15)
California Energy Efficiency Industry Council
Office of Ratepayer Advocates
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the proponents, existing
policy leads to a large pool of stranded energy efficiency
savings potential - the actual energy savings from the
building's existing equipment to the Title 24 code baseline -
and significant energy waste. This policy hinders the state
from achieving the governor's 2030 climate commitment to double
energy savings in existing buildings.
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: According to the opponents, the
assumption that new buildings and equipment meet code is
generally a good one. Were the CPUC to count energy efficiency
savings based on existing conditions, as suggested by this bill,
much of that energy efficiency will not be incremental to what
would have occurred otherwise. As a result, ratepayers will
likely pay more while achieving only minimal energy efficiency
savings.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 74-0, 6/2/15
AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom,
Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chiu,
Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman,
Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo
Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Hadley,
Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer,
Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis,
McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, O'Donnell, Olsen,
Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez,
Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting,
Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
NO VOTE RECORDED: Brough, Chang, Chávez, Grove, Mayes,
AB 802
Page 8
Obernolte
Prepared by:Jay Dickenson / E., U., & C. / (916) 651-4107
8/31/15 15:47:13
**** END ****