BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Senator Jerry Hill, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 804 Hearing Date: June 8, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Roger Hernández | |----------+------------------------------------------------------| |Version: |March 23, 2015 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Mark Mendoza | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Shorthand reporters: continuing education requirements. SUMMARY: Requires the Court Reporters Board of California to establish continuing education requirements for renewal of a shorthand reporter certificate. Existing law: 1) Provides for the certification and regulation of short hand reporters and for the regulation of shorthand reporting corporations by the Court Reporters Board (CRB) within the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA). (Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 8000 et seq.) 2) Provides that a certified shorthand reporter (CSR) certificate is valid for one year, and may be renewed by applying for the certificate renewal, paying the renewal fee, and notifying the CRB of any substantially related criminal convictions or of any disciplinary action taken by any regulatory agency against the licensee. AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 2 of ? (Business and Professions Code (BPC) § 8024) 3) Establishes the fees the CRB may charge, including fees for examinations, initial and renewal CSR certificates. (BPC § 8031) 4) Authorizes the CRB to investigate complaints against licensees. (BPC § 8008) 5) Authorizes the CRB to suspend, revoke, or deny a certificate, or take other disciplinary action for negligence, incompetence, and unprofessional conduct. (BPC § 8025) 6) Authorizes the CRB to issue administrative citations and assess fines for violations of the rules and regulations pertaining to CSRs. (BPC § 8027.5) AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 3 of ? 7) Requires the Director of the DCA, by regulation, to develop guidelines to prescribe components for mandatory continuing education (CE) programs administered by the DCA boards and bureaus to ensure that mandatory CE is used as a means to create a more competent licensing population, thereby enhancing public protection and specifies what the guidelines shall require in terms of providing CE programs. (BPC § 166) This bill: 1) Requires the CRB to adopt regulations that establish minimum CE requirements for renewal of a CSR certificate by July 1, 2016. 2) Requires certificate holders, six months after the effective date of the regulations, to certify completion of minimum CE requirements to the CRB when renewing a certificate. 3) Requires the CRB to ensure that the CE requirement is relevant to the practice of shorthand reporting. 4) Requires the CRB to establish a procedure for approving CE course providers, and requires CE providers to comply with AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 4 of ? procedures established by the CRB. 5) Permits the CRB to revoke or deny the right of a CE provider for failure to comply with requirements or regulations as specified. 6) Authorizes the CRB to establish exceptions to the CE requirements for individuals who cannot meet the CE requirements for reasons of health, military service, or undue hardship. 7) Requires that the CE requirements comply with the guidelines for mandatory CE established by the DCA. 8) Authorizes the CRB to adopt regulations to implement the above provisions. AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 5 of ? 9) Authorizes the CRB to establish a fee, as specified, for the approval of CE providers. FISCAL EFFECT: This measure has been keyed "fiscal" by Legislative Counsel. According to the Assembly Appropriations analysis, dated April 14, 2015, this bill would have "minor and absorbable costs to the CRB to implement the changes. Any additional costs incurred to approve continuing education providers could be covered by the fee authority granted in the bill." COMMENTS: 1.Purpose. The California Court Reporters Association and the Deposition Reporters Association of California are Co-Sponsors of the bill. According to the Author, this bill "requires the Court Reporters Board of California to adopt regulations to establish continuing education requirements for renewal of a shorthand reporter's certification that are relevant to the practice of shorthand reporting, and requires the board to establish a procedure for approving providers of (CE) courses. The Judicial Council rules mandate CE for all staff, including court reporters, but does not specifically mandate that the official court reporter obtain CE specifically as it relates to the job of court reporting. Once a shorthand reporter passes their initial test for licensing, they do not ever have to be retested in order to renew their license. The only time a CSR is ever retested for a license is if the CSR relinquishes their licenses then decides down the road to begin working again or becomes re-licensed." 2.Court Reporters. There are two types of CSRs (commonly known as court reporters). "Official" reporters are individuals who work as employees of the court system. "Freelance" reporters are individuals hired privately by court reporting businesses, firms, or attorneys to report depositions. In order to obtain a license, CSRs must attend a CRB-approved court reporting school and pass two written exams and a performance exam. There are 14 shorthand reporting schools in California and AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 6 of ? approximately 7,000 CSRs. The CRB issues a CSR certificate for a one-year period, which expires on the last day of the birth month of the licensee. 3.Enforcement Data. When a consumer makes a complaint against a licensee, the CRB reviews the complaint for jurisdiction and severity. Where the Board notices an error or mistake that is benign to the consumer, it may choose not to sanction the licensee-CSRs will often refund the payment for an unsatisfactory transcript. However, where the error greatly harms the consumer, the Board will initiate enforcement proceedings, which can include fines, license revocation citation, fine, probation, suspension and, in the most egregious of cases, revocation. Currently, the CRB receives about 100 consumer complaints a year, which is divided between untimely production of transcripts, inaccuracy, and other deficiencies. In the 2013-2014 Fiscal Year, the CRB received 106 complaints. For the same year, other similarly-sized boards received similar numbers: the Acupuncture Board received 189; the Board of Optometry received 238; the Osteopathic Medical Board received 360; and the Physician Assistant Board received 351. 4.Judicial Counsel Continuing Education Requirement. In 2007, the Judicial Counsel of California adopted a CE requirement for all personnel employed by the Court, including court reporters (California Rules of Court, Title 10, Division 2, Chapter 7). It requires court employees to take at least 8 hours of CE every 2 years. While not specific to court reporting, employees have two choices for CE: (1) they may choose from approved providers; or (2) they may choose a course that is relevant to the work of the courts or the judicial branch, is one hour long, and has identified anticipated learning outcomes (how new knowledge, skills, or abilities will be applied, demonstrated, or used). The Court's executive officers, managers, and supervisors must grant employees enough leave to complete the education, develop educational plans, and ensure proper reimbursement for travel. AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 7 of ? 5.Continuing Education for Court Reporters: A Legislative Sunset Review Issue. The issue of CE was discussed several times during the CRB's sunset review process. In 1996, the process covered the pros and cons of CE requirements, but the CRB deleted a CE proposal from its 1994 legislation when it learned that the Governor would not approve it. At that time, the CRB stated that many in the profession believe that the Board's pre-license testing system keeps the standard of entry at an appropriate level, and the intensity demanded in the day-to-day requirements in the occupation drives the individual licensees to seek and find the educational training requirements necessary on their own initiative. However, others believed that, because the industry changes quickly, there should be higher standards for the profession. In the end, the Joint Committee's recommendation did not include pursuing CE. The issue was again raised in the 2004-2005 review of the Board; however, the Joint Oversight Committee did not recommend establishing a CE requirement. 6.Necessity of CE for CSRs and Consumer Protection. The Co-Sponsors and Author of the bill note that the difficulty of the profession, the constant changes in legal terms, and the steady stream of new and complex technologies increase the risk of harm to the legal rights of consumers. In addition, many other states require CSRs to complete CE. Therefore, they state that the CRB should require CSRs to complete CE. Further, the CRB has also noted industry changes that may lead to consumer harm. It noted that the court reporting business model has changed, which now results in a larger percentage of independent contractors working for large corporate firms owned by non-licensees. In the past, CSRs primarily worked in firms owned by licensees that strongly encouraged the CSRs to stay current with changes in technology and litigation support services. Now, however, CSRs tend to work as independent contractors that are hired by large conglomerates. Because the larger conglomerates tend not to provide as much oversight of CSRs, CSRs working as independent contractors have less incentive AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 8 of ? to stay current with the profession. However, the CRB does not track the number of CSRs that work as independent contractors, for firms, or for the courts. Further, the enforcement data shows that CRB has not received a particularly high number of consumer complaints. Therefore, it is not clear what impact this industry change has made. One answer may be that issues in quality are rectified through the normal processes-sometimes inaccuracies can be resolved through the fact checking and proofreading process CSRs go through before delivering a final product. Without data, though, there is no clear answer and no issue to rectify. Nonetheless, imposing CE may be a useful preventive measure, given the risk to a litigant's legal rights. However, past analyses have noted a distinction between licensees that voluntarily seek out CE to better themselves and unwilling licensees that take CE because it is required. Because CSRs that consistently produce inaccurate transcripts may be disciplined by the CRB or have trouble finding work, they already have reasons to stay up to date with their practice. Therefore, an additional mandatory requirement may impact educational outcomes. There is also an argument that CSRs (and all professions) can benefit from CE, and there are many professional organizations in support. For example, there are ethical rules that court reporters must follow, and CE may strengthen faith in the profession. Therefore, the benefits to the profession and consumers will have to be weighed against the costs of a CE requirement to the consumers, licensees, and the CRB. 7.Prior Legislation. SB 671 (Price, 2011) would have required the CRB to adopt regulations to establish CE requirements for renewal of CSR certificate and requires the CRB to establish a procedure for approving providers of CE courses. ( Status : This bill was vetoed by Governor Brown). AB 2189 (Karnette, 2008) would have required the CRB to establish continuing education requirements for renewal of a shorthand reporter's certificate and makes other changes related to the certification and regulation of shorthand AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 9 of ? reporters.. ( Status : This bill was vetoed by Governor Brown). 8. Policy Issues : a) Prior unsuccessful bills. Legislation requiring CE for CSRs has been passed and vetoed two separate times in past legislative sessions. The most recent was SB 671 (Price) of 2011. The provisions of SB 671 were substantially similar to those contained in this bill; however, it was vetoed by Governor Brown, citing concerns about the burden of CE requirements. According to the Governor's veto message: "This bill would make license renewal for court reporters contingent on continuing education. The whole idea of legally mandated 'continuing education' is suspect in my mind. Professionals already are motivated to hone their skills - or risk not getting business. Requiring them to pay fees to 'continuing education providers' is an unwarranted burden." The Committee may wish to inquire of the Author, what, if anything, has been done to alleviate the Governor's concerns as explained in his veto message. b) Silent on dual credit. Currently, this bill would add on an additional continuing education requirement to CSRs. Thus, CSRs would have to attend and fulfill both the CE requirements by the Judicial Council and CRB. The Author may wish to inquire with the Judicial Council about whether or not continued education acquired via a CRB-approved course provider would satisfy its CE requirements. In other words, will a licensed CSR who is employed by the court and who must complete the continuing education required by the Judicial Council be required to fulfill as separate continuing education requirement to renew their license from the Board? c) Court Reporter fees for attendance. When attending a continuing education seminar, professionals pay about $35-$45 per session. This bill does not specify a range for how much licensees would have to pay to attend a CRB-approved, continuing education course. AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 10 of ? d) Unspecified hours for CE. The bill does not specify the number of hours of continuing education would be required for each annual license renewal period. As stated above, the Judicial Council requirement for official reporters is to complete eight hours of continuing education every two years. The Board will need to determine an appropriate number of hours through its regulatory process. 1.Arguments in Support. The California Court Reporters Association (Co-Sponsor) writes, "Under current law, there are no requirements in place to ensure that a CSR is maintaining the education needed to stay updated on rules, regulations, statutes and advancing technologies that affect the profession. While in many cases, continuing professional development and education is undertaken voluntarily, some reporters who practice in more isolated settings may not have access to information related to advancements or changes in the profession. Consumers of the products and services, offered by a CSR, expect to receive the latest available technology, i.e., real-time reporting, Internet text streaming, transcript repositories, exhibit scanning and linking to transcripts, and much more. Continuing education requirements ensure that every CSR can produce a verbatim record that continues to be held to the highest possible standard." SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION: Support: California Court Reporters Association (Sponsor) Deposition Reporters Association of California (Sponsor) American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Northern California Court Reporters Association Sacramento Official Court Reporters Association AB 804 (Roger Hernández) Page 11 of ? San Diego Superior Court Reporters Association Service Employees International Union Opposition: None on file as of June 2, 2015. -- END --