BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                       AB 809


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          809 (Obernolte)


          As Amended  March 26, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                |Noes                  |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Elections       |4-3   |Grove, Travis       |Ridley-Thomas,        |
          |                |      |Allen, Gatto,       |Gordon, Perea         |
          |                |      |Mullin              |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0  |Gomez, Bigelow,     |                      |
          |                |      |Bloom, Bonta,       |                      |
          |                |      |Calderon, Chang,    |                      |
          |                |      |Daly, Eggman,       |                      |
          |                |      |Gallagher, Eduardo  |                      |
          |                |      |Garcia, Holden,     |                      |
          |                |      |Jones, Quirk,       |                      |
          |                |      |Rendon, Wagner,     |                      |
          |                |      |Weber, Wood         |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Requires the ballot, if a proposed local initiative  
          imposes a tax or raises the rate of a tax, to include in the  








                                                                       AB 809


                                                                      Page  2





          statement of the ordinance to be voted on the amount of money to  
          be raised annually and the rate and duration of the tax to be  
          levied. 
          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, any costs to add the statement would be minor and  
          absorbable.


          COMMENTS:  According to the author, "California continues to rank  
          at the bottom when it comes to transparency and access to  
          government information.  The citizens of California have a right  
          to know how taxes will affect them and how those dollars are being  
          spent.  AB 809 takes a small step toward achieving this goal by  
          requiring the ballot statement for local tax measures to include  
          information on the amount of money to be raised annually and the  
          rate and duration of the tax to be levied.  This will help voters  
          be better informed when making decisions that could impact their  
          personal budgets."


          Current law requires a ballot to comply with a variety of laws  
          that dictate its form and content.  For example, existing law  
          requires a ballot to contain the title of each office, the names  
          of all qualified candidates, as specified, ballot designations, as  
          specified, titles and summaries of measures submitted to voters,  
          and instructions to voters, among other things.  Moreover, current  
          law requires a ballot to be printed in a certain form, as  
          specified.  Once all of these requirements are met, there is  
          limited space left on the ballot to accommodate further  
          requirements.  Consequently, it is common practice to include  
          other important election information in the sample ballot or  
          ballot pamphlet that is sent to all registered voters.  


          This bill would add another requirement to the ballot for a  
          proposed county, city, or district ordinance that is submitted to  
          the voters as an initiative measure.  This bill requires the  
          ballot, if a proposed local ordinance imposes a tax or raises the  
          rate of a tax, to include in the statement of the ordinance the  








                                                                       AB 809


                                                                      Page  3





          amount of money to be raised annually and the rate and duration of  
          the tax to be levied.  According to the author's background  
          materials, when citizens vote on local ballot measures, there is  
          no requirement in law that the ballot label states either the  
          amount of money to be raised by taxation or the rate of taxes to  
          be levied.  The author argues that Californians have a right to  
          know what they are voting on, especially when it involves tax  
          increases that could have a significant impact on their financial  
          position.  


          While having this information may be helpful in determining how a  
          local measure will raise taxes as well as providing the rate and  
          duration of the tax levied, it will be extremely challenging for  
          elections officials to include more information on the ballot.   
          Moreover, if the law allows for it, many local elections are  
          consolidated with other elections as a cost saving measure.   
          Consequently, it is most likely that the ballot will have a  
          variety of offices and measures to vote on, leaving less room on  
          the ballot for more information to be added.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
                          Nichole Becker / E. & R. / (916) 319-2094  FN:  
          0000395