BILL NUMBER: AB 813 ENROLLED
BILL TEXT
PASSED THE SENATE AUGUST 16, 2016
PASSED THE ASSEMBLY AUGUST 31, 2016
AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 22, 2015
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 14, 2015
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 7, 2015
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 26, 2015
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Gonzalez
FEBRUARY 26, 2015
An act to add Section 1473.7 to the Penal Code, relating to
criminal procedure.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 813, Gonzalez. Criminal procedure: postconviction relief.
Under existing law, although persons not presently restrained of
liberty may seek certain types of relief from the disabilities of a
conviction, the writ of habeas corpus is generally not available to
them. Existing law creates an explicit right for a person no longer
unlawfully imprisoned or restrained to prosecute a motion to vacate a
judgment based on newly obtained evidence of fraud or misconduct by
a government official, as specified.
This bill would create an explicit right for a person no longer
imprisoned or restrained to prosecute a motion to vacate a conviction
or sentence based on a prejudicial error damaging the moving party's
ability to meaningfully understand, defend against, or knowingly
accept the actual or potential adverse immigration consequences of a
plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or based on newly discovered
evidence of actual innocence, as specified. The bill would require a
court to grant the motion if the moving party establishes a ground
for relief, by a preponderance of the evidence. The bill would
require a court granting or denying the motion to specify the basis
for its conclusion.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 1473.7 is added to the Penal Code, to read:
1473.7. (a) A person no longer imprisoned or restrained may
prosecute a motion to vacate a conviction or sentence for either of
the following reasons:
(1) The conviction or sentence is legally invalid due to a
prejudicial error damaging the moving party's ability to meaningfully
understand, defend against, or knowingly accept the actual or
potential adverse immigration consequences of a plea of guilty or
nolo contendere.
(2) Newly discovered evidence of actual innocence exists that
requires vacation of the conviction or sentence as a matter of law or
in the interests of justice.
(b) A motion pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) shall be
filed with reasonable diligence after the later of the following:
(1) The date the moving party receives a notice to appear in
immigration court or other notice from immigration authorities that
asserts the conviction or sentence as a basis for removal.
(2) The date a removal order against the moving party, based on
the existence of the conviction or sentence, becomes final.
(c) A motion pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) shall be
filed without undue delay from the date the moving party discovered,
or could have discovered with the exercise of due diligence, the
evidence that provides a basis for relief under this section.
(d) All motions shall be entitled to a hearing. At the request of
the moving party, the court may hold the hearing without the personal
presence of the moving party if counsel for the moving party is
present and the court finds good cause as to why the moving party
cannot be present.
(e) When ruling on the motion:
(1) The court shall grant the motion to vacate the conviction or
sentence if the moving party establishes, by a preponderance of the
evidence, the existence of any of the grounds for relief specified in
subdivision (a).
(2) In granting or denying the motion, the court shall specify the
basis for its conclusion.
(3) If the court grants the motion to vacate a conviction or
sentence obtained through a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, the
court shall allow the moving party to withdraw the plea.
(f) An order granting or denying the motion is appealable under
subdivision (b) of Section 1237 as an order after judgment affecting
the substantial rights of a party.