BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 7, 2015


                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION


                                 Jose Medina, Chair


          AB 831  
          (Bonilla) - As Introduced February 26, 2015


          SUBJECT:  Student financial aid:  Cal Grant Program


          SUMMARY:  Establishes a formula to determine the amount of Cal  
          Grant awards for students attending nonprofit, private colleges  
          based on the average General Fund subsidy the state provides for  
          financially needy students attending the University of  
          California and California State University.  Specifically, this  
          bill:  





          1)Establishes findings and declarations regarding the importance  
            of private nonprofit colleges and universities accredited by  
            WASC to meet higher education needs and that stable  
            predictable funding formulas and eligibility requirements  
            ensure the state maximizes its investment by allowing families  
            to better plan and pay for higher education, in addition to  
            incentivizing private nonprofit colleges and universities to  
            enroll low-income Californians.  



          2)Establishes the maximum Cal Grant award amount for students  








                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  2





            attending private nonprofit institutions 75% of the base  
            funding per Cal Grant student at the UC and the CSU (the  
            average state support per student plus the average Cal Grant  
            award for UC and CSU), and phases in the maximum amounts as  
            follows: 



             a)   $9,084 for 2015-16.

             b)   70% of the amount calculated pursuant to (2) for  
               2016-17.

             c)   80% of the amount calculated pursuant to (2) for  
               2017-18.

             d)   90% of the amount calculated pursuant to (2) for  
               2018-19.

             e)   100% of the amount calculated pursuant to (2) for  
               2019-20 and each year thereafter.

          1)Requires, as a condition for the aforementioned funding, a  
            private nonprofit postsecondary educational institution to  
            submit performance metrics to the Association of Independent  
            California Colleges and Universities (AICCU).  

          2)Requires AICCU, in collaboration with the public higher  
            education segments, to determine a form and content for  
            consistent collection and reporting of required performance  
            metrics.

          3)Requires AICCU to provide performance metric data in a  
            cumulative report to the Legislature, Governor, Department of  
            Finance, and Legislative Analyst's Office on or before March  
            15, 2016 and each year thereafter.

          4)Requires the AICCU report to include all of the following data  
            with respect to each participating private nonprofit  








                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  3





            postsecondary educational institution:

             a)   The number of undergraduate students enrolled in that  
               institution and the percentage who are California  
               residents.

             b)   The number of graduate students enrolled in that  
               institution.

             c)   The number of transfer students from the California  
               Community Colleges (CCC) enrolled in that institution and  
               the percentage of undergraduate students of that  
               institution who are transfer students from the CCC.

             d)   The number of Pell Grant recipients enrolled in that  
               institution and the percentage of undergraduate students of  
               that institution who are Pell Grant recipients.

             e)   The number and percentage of Cal Grant recipients  
               enrolled in that institution and their ethnic composition  
               and the median amount of institutional aid provided to  
               them.

             f)   The four- and six-year graduation rates for freshman  
               entrants of that institution disaggregated by Pell and Cal  
               Grant recipients.

             g)   The two- and three-year graduation rates for transfer  
               students from the CCC disaggregated by Pell and Cal Grant  
               recipients.

             h)   The number of degrees awarded annually by the  
               institution in total and in each of the following  
               categories:

               i)     Undergraduate students who first enrolled in the  
                 institution as freshmen.

               ii)    Undergraduate students who first enrolled in the  








                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  4





                 institution as transfer students.

               iii)   Graduate students.

               iv)    Pell Grant recipients.

             i)   The number of degrees or credentials awarded in  
               health-related fields, teacher preparation, and the fields  
               of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics  
               (STEM).

          5)Provides that the maximum award for new Cal Grant recipients  
            attending for-profit institutions accredited by the Western  
            Association of Schools and Colleges is $8,056.

          6)Declares urgency for the statute to take effect immediately.

          EXISTING LAW authorizes the Cal Grant Program, administered by  
          CSAC, to provide grants to financially needy students to attend  
          college.  The maximum grants for Cal Grant A and B awards, for  
          students attending UC and CSU are equal to the amount of  
          mandatory systemwide fees at the respective segments.  The  
          maximum award amount for students attending private institutions  
          is set at $4,000 for private for-profit institutions and for  
          private non-profit institutions or private for-profit WASC  
          accredited institutions, the amount is set at $9,084 for the  
          2014-15 award year and $8,056 for 2015-16. 


          


          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown.  However, the according to the Senate  
          Appropriations Committee analysis of similar legislation  
          authored in 2014, CSAC estimated that increasing Cal Grant award  
          levels for private, WASC-accredited colleges would result in  
          additional costs of $12.3 million in 2015-16, $34.9 million in  
          2016-17, $65.3 million in 2017-18, and $102 million in 2018-19  
          (General Fund).  








                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  5







          


          COMMENTS:  Purpose of this bill.  According to the author,  
          financially needy and academically deserving students should be  
          provided more choices when selecting a college. This bill  
          creates a Cal Grant award amount formula for students attending  
          private, nonprofit colleges and universities in order to create  
          fairness and predictability for students as they plan for  
          college.   



          The author notes that since the enactment of the Cal Grant  
          Entitlement program, there has been no policy for setting the  
          Cal Grant maximum award for students attending private,  
          nonprofit colleges and universities. The Cal Grant maximum for  
          students attending UC and CSU is equal to the system wide fees.   
          Since 2000, the Cal Grant award amount for students attending  
          private institutions has not been linked to any funding formula  
          and has been vulnerable to cuts resulting in a decline in value  
          by 37% in current dollars. Furthermore, the Cal Grant award for  
          students attending private, nonprofit institutions will receive  
          another 11% reduction for the upcoming school year should no  
          action be taken beforehand. 





          The author argues that the lack of a policy for determining the  
          Cal Grant award amount for students attending private, nonprofit  
          institutions has led to an unpredictable and arbitrarily  
          determined award amount. This process undermines the original  
          purpose of the Cal Grant program, which is to allow financially  
          needy students to choose an institution that best serves their  
          academic and financial needs. AB 831 seeks to strengthen the Cal  








                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  6





          Grant program and the portability of the award. It should be  
          noted that the majority of these students are underrepresented  
          in higher education and 35% of these students are the first in  
          their families to go to college. Students at California's  
          accredited private, nonprofit institutions have higher  
          graduation rates than students at public institutions and are  
          more likely to complete their degree in four years. 





          Background on Cal Grant Program.  According to the Public Policy  
          Institute of California (PPIC), more than half of all  
          postsecondary students in California receive grant or  
          scholarship aid.  The primary sources of financial aid funding  
          are the federal government (43% in 2012), the state government  
          (23% in 2012) and institutional aid (27% in 2012).  

          State grant aid in California is provided primarily through the  
          Cal Grant Program and the CCC Board of Governors Fee Waiver  
          program.  Cal Grant A awards to cover full tuition and fees at  
          UC ($12,192) or CSU ($5,472), up to $8,056, beginning in  
          2015-16, at private colleges accredited by the Western  
          Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC), and up to $4,000 at  
          other private colleges. Cal Grant B awards provide additional  
          grant aid up to $1,648 for very low-income students to help pay  
          for access costs.  Cal Grant C provides up to $2,462 in tuition  
          and $547 for living expenses for vocational students.  

          Cal Grant A and B Entitlement Awards guarantee awards to  
          students who meet specified GPA and income-related criteria and  
          apply within deadlines.  The majority of Cal Grant recipients  
          (211,300 in 2013-14) receive an Entitlement award.  The majority  
          of Cal Grant applicants, however, do not qualify for an  
          Entitlement award because they are more than a year out of high  
          school, decide to go to college after the Entitlement  
          application deadline, or do not meet age or other requirements  
          when they transfer.  Competitive Cal Grant A and B awards are  








                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  7





          available to applicants who did not receive an entitlement  
          award.  In the Competitive program, over 300,000 applicants  
          compete annually for 22,500 awards.  

          Unmet need.  According to The Institute for College Access and  
          Success (TICAS), the Cal Grant Program leaves the neediest  
          students underserved.  Less than one quarter of the lowest  
          income aid applicants in California receives a Cal Grant and on  
          average lower income recipients are awarded smaller grants than  
          higher income recipients.  TICAS notes that underrepresented  
          students are also less likely to receive grants, and their  
          grants tend to be smaller.  The average student denied a Cal  
          Grant has an average family income of less than $21,000, a  
          family size of three, and a GPA of 2.9.  The Committee may wish  
          to consider how the proposal contained in this bill, to increase  
          the maximum grant amount for students attending private  
          non-profit colleges, fits into overall higher education  
          affordability priorities.  



          Background on formula provisions. This bill establishes a  
          formula for calculating the amount of a Cal Grant award for  
          students attending private institutions. According to a 2005  
          report by the California Postsecondary Education Commission  
          (CPEC), prior to 2001 a formula for determining grant amounts of  
          non-public institutions similar to that established in this bill  
          was contained in statute.  According to the CPEC, this formula  
          was developed in consultation with representatives from all of  
          California's postsecondary education institutions as well as the  
          Legislative Analyst's Office and the Department of Finance.  

          According to the CPEC, both the LAO and the California Student  
          Aid Commission recommended that the Legislature return to a  
          long-term Cal Grant policy that links the maximum award for  
          nonpublic institutions to the weighted average General Fund  
          subsidy the state provides for financially needy students  
          attending the UC and CSU.  CPEC recommended that, in exchange  
          for these additional Cal Grant resources, institutions be  








                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  8





          required to annually report data on students to enable the State  
          to determine if funding was ensuring financially needy  
          Californians had higher education access and choice.  

          This bill contains reporting provisions consistent with the CPEC  
          recommendation and consistent with the reporting required of UC  
          and CSU pursuant to AB 94 (Committee on Budget), Chapter 50,  
          Statutes of 2013.   



          Prior Legislation.  AB 1318 (Bonilla) of 2014 was substantially  
          similar to this bill except that under AB 1318, students  
          attending for-profit WASC accredited institutions would also  
          have been eligible for the increased award amount.  AB 1318 was  
          held by the author on the Senate Floor.


          


          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:


          


          Support


          


          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees,  
          AFL-CIO


          Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities









                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  9






          Biola University


          California Institute of Technology


          California Lutheran University


          Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science


          Claremont Graduate University


          College Options


          Dominican University of California


          Fielding Graduate University


          Fresno Pacific University


          La Sierra University


          Loyola Marymount University


          Mills College


          Marymount California University









                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  10






          Mount Saint Mary's University


          Pepperdine University


          Point Loma Nazarene University


          Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce


          Saint Mary's College of California


          Samuel Merritt University


          San Diego Christian College


          Santa Clara University


          Simpson University


          Stanford University


          University of La Verne


          University of San Diego


          University of the Pacific









                                                                     AB 831


                                                                    Page  11






          Vanguard University


          William Jessup University


          


          Opposition


          


          California State Student Association







          Analysis Prepared by:Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960