BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 852| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 852 Author: Burke (D), et al. Amended: 6/15/15 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE LABOR & IND. REL. COMMITTEE: 4-1, 6/24/15 AYES: Mendoza, Jackson, Leno, Mitchell NOES: Stone SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 5-2, 8/27/15 AYES: Lara, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza NOES: Bates, Nielsen ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 55-24, 4/27/15 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Public works: prevailing wages SOURCE: State Building and Construction Trades Council of California DIGEST: This bill expands the definition of public works to also include any construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work done under private contract on a project for a general acute care hospital, as specified, when the project is paid for, in whole or in part, with the proceeds of conduit revenue bonds issued by a public agency on or after January 1, 2016. ANALYSIS: AB 852 Page 2 Existing law: 1)Requires that not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, as determined by the director of the Department of Industrial Relations, be paid to all workers employed on a "public works" project costing over $1,000 dollars and imposes misdemeanor penalties for violation of this requirement. 2)Defines "public work" to include, among other things, construction, alteration, demolition, installation or repair work done under contract and paid for, in whole or in part, out of public funds. 3)Defines "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds" to include, among other things, fees, costs, rents, insurance or bond premiums, loans, interest rates, or other obligations normally required in the execution of a contract that are paid, reduced, charged at less than fair market value, waived or forgiven by the state or political subdivision. 4)Exempts from the definition of "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds" specified types of affordable housing, private residential housing, private development projects, qualified residential projects, low income housing projects, state manufacturing tax credits, and single family residential projects. 5)Defines "conduit revenue bond" as any municipal security the proceeds of which are loaned to any nongovernmental borrower, including, but not limited to, persons, for-profit corporations, nonprofit corporations pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, partnerships, and other legal entities for purposes that are permitted for qualified private activity bonds under applicable federal law. 6)Defines "conduit financing provider" as any county, city, city and county, public district, public authority, public corporation, nonprofit corporation, joint powers authority, or other statutorily constituted public entity that issues one or more conduit revenue bonds. This bill: AB 852 Page 3 1)Expands the definition of "public works," for purposes of prevailing wage payment requirements, to also include any construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work done under private contract on a project for a general acute care hospital when the project is paid for, in whole or in part, with the proceeds of conduit revenue bonds issued by a public agency on or after January 1, 2016. 2)Exempts from its provisions, a project for a rural general acute care hospital with a maximum of 76 beds. Background A Brief History of Prevailing Wage Law: Existing law requires that not less than the general prevailing wage rate of per diem wages, as determined by the director of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), be paid to all workers employed on a "public works" projects. The prevailing wage rate is the basic hourly rate paid on public works projects to a majority of workers engaged in a particular craft, classification or type of work within the locality and in the nearest labor market area. In general, "public works" is defined to include construction, alteration, demolition, installation or repair work done under contract and "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds." Over a decade ago, there was much administrative and legislative action over what constituted the term "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds." These debates culminated in the enactment of SB 975 (Alarcon, Chapter 938, Statutes of 2001), which codified a definition of "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds" that included certain payments, transfers, credits, reductions, waivers and performances of work. SB 975 also exempted certain affordable housing, residential and private development projects. Conduit Revenue Bonds: Bonds that are issued for the purpose of making loans to entities other than state or local governments are commonly referred to as "conduit bonds" or "conduit issues," AB 852 Page 4 and state or local governments which issue these bonds are commonly referred to as "conduit issuers." (Your Responsibilities as a Conduit Issuer of Tax-Exempt Bonds, Publication 5005 (4-2012) Catalog #59471F, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service) According to the IRS, a conduit issuer in a conduit bond financing typically issues the bonds and loans the bond proceeds to a conduit borrower. A conduit borrower is generally responsible for the payment of debt service on the conduit bond issue and is usually contractually obligated to maintain the tax-exempt status of the bonds. The California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (I-Bank), housed within the CA Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, is the State's only general purpose financing authority whose mission is to finance public infrastructure and private developments that promote a healthy climate for jobs, contribute to a strong economy and improve the quality of life in California communities. The I-Bank facilitates access to funding from private capital markets through its Conduit Revenue Bond Financing Program, which provides tax-exempt bond funding for eligible economic development facility projects throughout California. The bonds are repaid by the private sector borrower, and are not a debt of the I-Bank or the State of California. According to the I-Banks annual activity report from fiscal year 2011-2012, I-Bank issued $867,856,500 of conduit revenue bonds for qualified California manufacturing companies, 501(c)(3) nonprofit entities and for other governmental entities to create/retain jobs in the state, to facilitate research and cultural endeavors and for other public purposes. A Los Angeles Times article from 2011 reported that conduits had grown roughly three times faster than the general municipal market over the last five years, according to data from Thomson Reuters, a New York data firm; $84 billion of these bonds were issued in 2010 alone. ('Conduit' muni bond defaults draw scrutiny, June 14, 2011) According to the article, investors don't have to pay taxes on their interest from municipal bonds, enabling companies to borrow money at lower interest rates than they could get on their own. The article notes that although conduits account for roughly 20% of all municipal bonds, they have been responsible for about 70% of all defaults in the municipal bond market in recent years, according to the Income AB 852 Page 5 Securities Advisors, a Florida research firm. Stated need for the bill: Because these types of public subsidies are not included under the definition of "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds," they don't currently trigger the coverage of the prevailing wage law. A couple of determinations by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) have addressed this issue finding that conduit bond funded projects are not public work, and therefore not subject to the prevailing wage. In a 2005 determination [by then acting director of DIR, John Rea] regarding a Rancho Santa Fe Village Senior Affordable Housing Project, the director stated that: "?money collected for, or in the coffers of, a public entity is "public funds" within the meaning of Section 1720 (which defines public works). Here neither the conduit bond revenues nor the loan repayments ever enter the coffers of a public entity, nor are they collected for the public entity. Since none of the money flows into or out of public coffers, the conduit bond financing is not "the payment of money or the equivalent of money by the state or political subdivision?" Rancho Santa Fe Village Senior Affordable Housing Project, PW 2004-16 (Feb. 25, 2005) The acting director argued that because it assigns all of its rights to a bond trustee, the issuer never has possession of either the bond proceeds or the loan repayments that are made by the borrower directly to the bond trustee. However, the State Building and Construction Trades Council (source of this bill) argued that the use of tax-exempt bond financing constitutes a loan at below-market interest rates and therefore is covered under Labor Code §1720(b)(4). This code section states that "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds" includes "(4) Fees, costs, rents, insurance or bond premiums, loans, interest rates, or other obligations that would normally be required in the execution of the contract, that are paid, reduced, charged at less than fair market value, waived, or forgiven by the state or political subdivision." This bill would address this uncertainty regarding conduit revenue bonds being paid for by public funds by specifying that "public work" also means any work done under private contract on a project for a general acute care hospital, except as specified, when the project is paid for, in whole or in part, AB 852 Page 6 with the proceeds of conduit revenue bonds issued by a public agency. Prior Legislation SB 615 (Galgiani of 2013) was very similar to this bill and would have expanded the definition of "public works" to include specified work done under private contract on a hospital or health care facility project when the project is paid for in whole or in part with the proceeds of conduit revenue bonds. Unlike this bill, SB 615 did not include an exemption for rural general acute care hospitals of 76 beds or less. SB 615 was vetoed by the Governor. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: Yes According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this measure would increase the number of public works projects. Consequently, the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) would likely experience additional workload related to the administration and enforcement of California prevailing wage law. The number of future health facility construction projects subject to this bill is unknown; however, if the additional workload to DIR required a new position, total costs (salary, benefits and equipment expenses) would be $125,000 in the first year, and $120,000 ongoing (special funds). The Compliance Monitoring Unit (CMU) is the component within DIR that monitors and enforces prevailing wage requirements on public works projects. It is currently funded through a combination of (1) the General Fund, (2) a special fund loan, and (3) a of one percent surcharge on state issuances of general obligation (GO) bonds. Because this bill concerns conduit revenue bonds, not GO bonds, their issuance will not fund the CMU. Consequently, any increased costs to DIR resulting from the bill could lead to a potential General Fund cost pressure. Additionally, the bill could impact revenues to the California Health Facilities Financing Authority (CHFFA). Specifically, revenues to CHFFA could be either higher or lower, depending on future CHFFA conduit bond issuance. AB 852 Page 7 SUPPORT: (Verified8/28/15) State Building and Construction Trades Council of California (source) California Chapters of the National Electrical Contractors Association California Conference Board of the Amalgamated Transit Union California Conference of Machinists California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO California Legislative Conference of the Plumbing, Heating and Piping Industry California Teamsters Public Affairs Council Construction Employers' Association Engineers & Scientists of California International Longshore & Warehouse Union Professional & Technical Engineers UNITE-HERE, AFL-CIO Union Roofing Contractors Association United Contractors Utility Workers Union of America Wall and Ceiling Alliance OPPOSITION: (Verified8/28/15) None received ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The author argues that this bill would add conduit bond financing to the types of subsidies that trigger prevailing wage coverage, thereby recognizing that public funds (through foregone tax revenues) are being used to subsidize the project. According to supporters, this bill will close a loophole in state law by requiring healthcare companies electing to receive tax-exempt conduit bond financing from a public agency to pay construction workers the prevailing wage and therefore attract the most competent and skilled local workforce to build these complex medical facilities. They argue that because private entities utilize these bonds to save money in interest payments, it makes sense to ensure that any work being paid for by proceeds from conduit bonds should, at the very least, go AB 852 Page 8 towards providing a livable wage for the construction workers building the projects that the bonds fund. ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 55-24, 4/27/15 AYES: Alejo, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, McCarty, Medina, Mullin, Nazarian, O'Donnell, Olsen, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Weber, Williams, Wood, Atkins NOES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Brough, Chang, Chávez, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Jones, Kim, Lackey, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, Melendez, Obernolte, Patterson, Wagner, Waldron, Wilk NO VOTE RECORDED: Campos Prepared by:Alma Perez / L. & I.R. / (916) 651-1556 8/31/15 16:35:20 **** END ****