BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 854 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 854 (Weber) As Amended May 28, 2015 Majority vote ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+------+--------------------+--------------------| |Education |7-0 |O'Donnell, Chávez, | | | | |Kim, McCarty, | | | | |Santiago, Thurmond, | | | | |Weber | | | | | | | |----------------+------+--------------------+--------------------| |Appropriations |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow, | | | | |Bonta, Calderon, | | | | |Chang, Daly, | | | | |Eggman, Gallagher, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Eduardo Garcia, | | | | |Gordon, Holden, | | | | |Jones, Quirk, | | | | |Rendon, Wagner, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- AB 854 Page 2 SUMMARY: Expands the uses of Foster Youth Services (FYS) funding to support students in all foster care placements, makes significant changes to the FYS program, and establishes a State Foster Youth Services Coordinator in the California Department of Education (CDE). Specifically, this bill: 1)Allows FYS funding to be used to support any student in foster care, including students residing in juvenile detention facilities. 2)Allows the FYS coordinator to work on behalf of any student in foster care residing or attending school in their county. 3)Requires a FYS program, in consultation with local educational agencies (LEAs), the county social services agency and county probation department, to prescribe the methodology for designing specific supports for students in foster care, and in doing so, consider at least all of the following: the needs of specific age groups, students in foster care in specific geographic areas with the highest concentration of students in foster care, and students in foster care with the greatest academic need. Encourages a FYS program to first provide services for students in foster care who reside in group homes or other institutional settings. 4)Requires each FYS program to develop and implement a plan documenting how the program will: a) Collaborate with county child welfare agencies, county probation departments, and LEAs to minimize changes in school placement and support the placement of students in regular public school settings. States that the program may pay for transportation costs related to school placement. AB 854 Page 3 b) Collaborate with county child welfare agencies, county probation departments, and LEAs so that when it is in the best interests of a student in foster care to transfer schools, transfers are done at an educationally appropriate time, educational records are quickly transferred, appropriate partial credits are awarded, and the student in foster care is quickly enrolled in appropriate classes. 1)Requires these plans to document how FYS programs will: a) Collaborate with county child welfare agencies, county probation departments, and school districts to ensure students in foster care have an active education team, defined to include existing education teams such as individualized education program teams and multidisciplinary teams, that includes an educational rights holder, caregiver, social worker, teacher, counselor, court appointed special advocate, other stakeholders, and the student b) Participate in education teams as is helpful and needed and help the education team assess the educational strengths and needs of a student in foster care, and help develop, monitor, and update an education plan, defined to include existing education plans c) Provide tutoring, mentoring, counseling, transition, school-based social work, and emancipation services, if those services are determined to be needed by the Executive Advisory Council, and if the county child welfare agency, county probation department, or school district are unable to provide those services. d) Maintain information on all of the following for purposes of ensuring that students in foster care, education rights AB 854 Page 4 holders, and other education team members are informed of all available opportunities for a student to attend specified schools and educational programs. e) Maintain information on postsecondary educational institutions, career technical education programs, and postsecondary opportunities f) Collaborate with local postsecondary educational institutions, including the California Community Colleges, the California State University, and the University of California, and with county independent living programs to facilitate a seamless transition from high school to postsecondary educational institutions, and to provide students in foster care currently enrolled in high school assistance with college applications, matriculation, and financial aid. g) Facilitate on behalf of individual students in foster care to ensure transfer of records, transcript analysis, credit recovery, timely individualized education programs (IEPs) and special education services, timely placement in English learner programs, enrollment in, or transition to, comprehensive schools or the least restrictive educational placements, and ensure that education entitlements specific to students in foster care are provided, including receiving partial credits, the right to attend the school of origin, and access to extracurricular activities including interscholastic sports. h) Collaborate with local educational agencies, child welfare, juvenile courts, and Special Education Local Plan Areas (SELPAs) in an effort to ensure that students in foster care have an identified education rights holders with the capacity to support educational success capable of specified AB 854 Page 5 support activities. i) Collaborate with county child welfare agencies, county probation departments, and local educational agencies to facilitate information sharing, as specified, and support interagency efforts to improve the educational outcomes of students in foster care, as specified. 1)Requires each FYS program to work with their county office of education to ensure the implementation of portions of school district and county office of education Local Control and Accountability Plans that pertain to foster youth to conduct specified activities. 2)Requires that each FYS program establish an Executive Advisory Council, which would include representatives from the county child welfare agency, the county probation department, local educational agencies, local postsecondary educational institutions, and community organizations, and if possible, include foster youth, caregivers, education rights holders, and other interested stakeholders. FYS coordinator would be a permanent member. The Councils would be required to regularly review the recommendations to the FYS plan. 3)Modifies the requirements of the bi-annual FYS report to the Legislature. Requires that the report include aggregate educational outcome data for each county in which there were at least 15 students in foster care who attended school in the county, with information on each specified indicators. Requires that, whenever possible, the data in the report be the same as is used by the Superintendent in determining the Academic Performance Index or its successor. 4)Requires the CDE to collaborate with the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges and the Chancellor of the California State University to identify indicators that can be AB 854 Page 6 used to track access to postsecondary education for students in foster care participating in a FYS program. 5)Requires that each county office of education with a FYS program develop and enter into an agreement with the county child welfare agency pursuant to which FYS program funds would be used, to leverage funds received pursuant to federal Social Security Act Title IV-E and any other funds that may be used to specifically address the educational needs of students in foster care, or requires that they explain in writing, annually, why a memorandum of understanding is not practical or feasible. 6)Requires the SPI to identify a State FYS Coordinator within the CDE, who would be responsible for a variety of administrative functions, and deletes requirements for the SPI to convene an advisory committee. 7)States that the SPI may provide funding to one or more LEAs to work with the State FYS Coordinator to provide statewide technical support to ensure educational, child welfare, and judicial agencies receive the technical support needed to improve the educational success of students in foster care. States that funding for the technical assistance described above may come from the FYS appropriation in the annual Budget Act, as determined by the Superintendent, but shall be no more than 5 percent of the FYS budget allocation for the applicable fiscal year. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: 1)Ongoing Proposition 98/General Fund cost pressures of approximately $20 to $30 million to expand the FYS program to serve all foster youth. For several years, the existing FYS AB 854 Page 7 program has received $15.2 million (Proposition 98/General Fund) to serve approximately one-third of foster youth in California. This bill expands services to the remaining two-thirds (approximately 40,000 foster youth) but does not provide additional funding. It is estimated that the costs to fully fund the program to provide the same level of services for all foster youth is approximately $35 million to $45 million. 2)Ongoing General Fund administrative costs, in the range of $300,000, to provide technical assistance to coordinate resources; collect, manage and report data and other program oversight requirements. COMMENTS: The "Invisible Achievement Gap." A 2013 report by the Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning at WestEd, titled "The Invisible Achievement Gap," for the first time linked education and child welfare data to identify the achievement gap for students in foster care relative to their peers. It found, based on 2009-10 educational data, that students in foster care represented a subgroup distinct in many ways from other low-income students. Among the findings in this report were that foster youth: 1)Have among the lowest scores in English-language arts. 2)Have the lowest scores in mathematics of any subgroup. AB 854 Page 8 3)Have the highest dropout rate, nearly three times the rate of other students. 4)Have the lowest high school graduation rate of any subgroup. The report also found that students in foster care are more likely to change schools during the school year, more likely to be enrolled in low-performing schools, less likely to participate in state assessments, and significantly more likely to be enrolled in nontraditional schools. FYS program outcomes. In its 2014 report to the Legislature, the CDE reported that for students served by FYS in the 2012-13 school year: 1)Seventy-two percent of foster youth served gained more than one month of academic growth per month of tutoring received, surpassing the target objective by 12%. 2)Sixty-two percent of eligible 12th graders completed a high school program (compared to the general foster care graduation rate of 58%) 3)Nineteen hundredths of a percent (0.19%) of foster youth served were expelled, surpassing the target of less than 5%. 4)Students exceeded their attendance target rate of 90%. Refocusing the FYS program around support and coordination. The FYS program was largely built around a direct service model, providing tutoring, mentoring, counseling, and other services to AB 854 Page 9 students - services for which there was little dedicated funding in 1973. The program statute still reflects this model, requiring a hierarchy of services, for example, starting with tutoring. Over the course of this program's history the landscape of school finance and accountability has changed dramatically. Most notably, through the Local Control Funding Formula and LCAPs, school districts are both receiving more support for, and being held accountable for, the educational needs and outcomes of students in foster care as never before. This bill proposes to replace the FYS model in statute with a new role for the program - one of support, coordination, planning, and leadership. This is evident, for example, in the provision of this bill which requires that direct services be provided only if they cannot be provided by other agencies, such as school districts. Given LCFF and many other policy changes since the FYS program statute was written, an updating is justified. The programmatic changes in this bill would shift the role of the FYS from direct services to the creation of a kind of support infrastructure for the education of students in foster care. Analysis Prepared by: Tanya Lieberman / ED. / (916) 319-2087 FN: 0000799 AB 854 Page 10