BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 884


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 20, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          884 (Rendon) - As Amended May 5, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Rules                          |Vote:|11 - 0       |
          |Committee:   |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |Elections and Redistricting    |     |5 - 1        |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill:


          1)Requires the Attorney General (AG), if in preparing a  








                                                                     AB 884


                                                                    Page  2





            circulating title and summary for a proposed initiative,  
            determines that the measure would likely violate an  
            individual's constitutional rights, to include a specified  
            statement of such in the title and summary. This statement  
            would not count toward the existing 100-word limit to the  
            title and summary.


          2)Authorizes an elector to seek a writ of mandate challenging  
            inclusion of the above statement.


          FISCAL EFFECT:


          The AG will experience additional, unknown costs associated with  
          analyzing the constitutionality of proposed initiatives, with  
          respect to individual rights, and defending potential challenges  
          to any determination that a measure would violate those rights.  
          If the equivalent of a half-time attorney position was required,  
          ongoing costs would be $75,000 annually.


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. According to the American Civil Liberties Union of  
            California, "?AB 884 is a modest step forward. The bill  
            provides a simple mechanism to inform voters of the likely  
            impact of a potential ballot measure on the constitutionally  
            protected rights of individuals."


          2)Background. In February of this year, a proposed initiative  
            measure, entitled the "Sodomite Suppression Act" by its  
            proponent, was submitted to the AG for preparation of a  
            circulating title and summary.  Among other provisions, that  
            measure provides that a "person who willingly touches another  
            person of the same gender for the purposes of sexual  








                                                                     AB 884


                                                                    Page  3





            gratification [shall] be put to death" and that the  
            distribution or transmission of "sodomistic propaganda," as  
            defined, is punishable by a $1 million fine, imprisonment for  
            10 years, or expulsion from the state.



          Last month, Attorney General Kamala Harris filed an action for  
            declaratory relief seeking judicial authorization not to issue  
            a circulating title and summary for that proposed initiative  
            measure.  In announcing that action, Attorney General Harris  
            issued the following statement:
               As Attorney General of California, it is my sworn duty  
               to uphold the California and United States  
               Constitutions and to protect the rights of all  
               Californians. This proposal not only threatens public  
               safety, it is patently unconstitutional, utterly  
               reprehensible, and has no place in a civil society.  
               Today, I am filing an action for declaratory relief  
               with the Court seeking judicial authorization for  
               relief from the duty to prepare and issue the title  
               and summary for the "Sodomite Suppression Act."  If  
               the Court does not grant this relief, my office will  
               be forced to issue a title and summary for a proposal  
               that seeks to legalize discrimination and vigilantism.


            Attorney General Harris' request for declaratory relief is  
            pending in the Sacramento Superior Court.


          3)Opposition. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association states, "?  
            we think such broad language being included in the ballot  
            pamphlet could lead to the direct democracy process becoming  
            needlessly politicized, and also confusing, for voters.  For  
            instance, what is to stop a pension reform measure from having  
            this warning because it might violate an individual's right to  
            a secure retirement? Or regarding the more recent Proposition  
            26, that it violates an individual's right to breathe clean  








                                                                     AB 884


                                                                    Page  4





            air because it allegedly aids polluters? While well  
            intentioned, without tighter controls this language could be  
            subject to manipulation."


          Analysis Prepared by:Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081