BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                     AB 885


                                                                    Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          885 (Lopez)


          As Amended  January 21, 2016


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Committee       |Votes|Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Human Services  |7-0  |Chu, Mayes, Calderon, |                    |
          |                |     |Lopez, Maienschein,   |                    |
          |                |     |Mark Stone, Thurmond  |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Judiciary       |10-0 |Mark Stone, Wagner,   |                    |
          |                |     |Alejo, Chau, Chiu,    |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher,            |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |Cristina Garcia,      |                    |
          |                |     |Holden, Maienschein,  |                    |
          |                |     |O'Donnell             |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |----------------+-----+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0 |Gomez, Bigelow,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bloom, Bonilla,       |                    |
          |                |     |Bonta, Calderon,      |                    |
          |                |     |Chang, Daly, Eggman,  |                    |
          |                |     |Gallagher, Eduardo    |                    |








                                                                     AB 885


                                                                    Page  2





          |                |     |Garcia, Holden,       |                    |
          |                |     |Jones, Quirk, Wagner, |                    |
          |                |     |Weber, Wood           |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
          |                |     |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


          SUMMARY:  Facilitates former foster youth re-entering care upon  
          the disruption of their permanent relationship.  Specifically,  
          this bill:  


          1)Removes the requirement that a guardian must no longer be  
            receiving aid on behalf of a nonminor former dependent who  
            received aid under the Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment  
            (Kin-GAP) program after the age of 18 or a nonminor who  
            received adoption assistance after the age of 18 in order for  
            those nonminors to be able to petition the court to remain in  
            foster care.


          2)Requires the court to ensure that prior notice of a hearing  
            regarding a nonminor's petition to remain in foster care is  
            given to that nonminor's adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s).


          3)Requires a nonminor's adoptive parent(s) or guardian(s) to be  
            deceased or no longer receiving payment on behalf of that  
            nonminor in order for the nonminor to enter into a voluntary  
            reentry agreement to establish eligibility for foster care  
            benefits, as specified.


          4)Removes the requirement that a nonminor former dependent child  
            or ward of the juvenile court be receiving Aid to Families  
            with Dependent Children-Foster Care (AFDC-FC) benefits, as  
            specified, as one criterion for continued eligibility to  
            receive aid.  Instead requires that the child or ward be  








                                                                     AB 885


                                                                    Page  3





            otherwise eligible to receive AFDC-FC benefits, as specified.


          5)Makes additional technical amendments.


          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Establishes a state and local system of child welfare  
            services, including foster care, for children who have been  
            adjudged by the court to be at risk or have been abused or  
            neglected, as specified.  (Welfare and Institutions Code  
            Section (WIC) 202)
          2)Allows a juvenile court to adjudge a child a ward or a  
            dependent of the court for specified reasons, including but  
            not limited to if the child has been left without any  
            provision for support, as specified.  (WIC 300)


          3)States that the purpose of foster care law is to provide  
            maximum safety and protection for children who are currently  
            being physically, sexually, or emotionally abused, neglected,  
            or exploited, and to ensure the safety, protection, and  
            physical and emotional well-being of children who are at risk  
            of harm.  (WIC 300.2)


          4)Defines "nonminor dependent" as a current or former foster  
            youth who is between18 and 21 years old, in foster care under  
            responsibility of the county welfare department, county  
            probation department, or Indian Tribe, and participating in a  
            transitional independent living plan.  (WIC 11400(v))


          5)Defines "nonminor former dependent or ward" as either:


             a)   A nonminor who turned 18 while subject to an order for  








                                                                     AB 885


                                                                    Page  4





               foster care placement, and for whom dependency,  
               delinquency, or transition jurisdiction has been  
               terminated, and who is still under the general jurisdiction  
               of the court; or
             b)   A nonminor who is at least 18 years old and, while a  
               minor, was a dependent child or ward of the juvenile court  
               when the guardianship was established, as specified, and  
               the juvenile court dependency or wardship was dismissed  
               following the establishment of the guardianship.  (WIC  
               11400(aa))


          6)Revises and expands federal funding and programs for certain  
            foster and adopted children via the Fostering Connections to  
            Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008.  (Public Law  
            110-351)
          7)Provides for extended foster care funding for youth until age  
            20, as well as adopts other changes to conform to the federal  
            Fostering Connections to Success Act.  (WIC 241.1, 303, 366.3  
            388,391, 450, 1140, 11402, 11403)
          8)Allows a nonminor former foster youth under the age of 21 to  
            petition the court for re-entry into foster care if his or her  
            guardian or adoptive parent is no longer providing him or her  
            with support, as specified.  (WIC 388.1)


          9)Allows nonminor dependents who meet general AFDC-FC  
            requirements, as well as one or more of a set of specified  
            requirements, to voluntarily continue placement in or to  
            re-enter into foster care.  (WIC 11403(b))


          FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, this bill may result in the following costs:


          1)Ongoing increase in state costs in the range of $78,000 to  
            $103,000 (General Fund) per year for each nonminor former  
            dependent that resumes dependency under the extended foster  








                                                                     AB 885


                                                                    Page  5





            care program.  To the extent two cases per year resume  
            dependency under the extended foster care program, cumulative  
            costs would range between $310,000 and $410,000 annually after  
            two years, including grant and additional social worker  
            administrative costs. 
          2)To the extent a nonminor former dependent would have otherwise  
            remained in extended Kin-GAP or the Adoption Assistance  
            Program (AAP), estimated costs would be offset in part by  
            savings from terminated guardianship/adoptions of $10,000 to  
            $12,000 per case per year. 


          COMMENTS:  


          Child Welfare Services (CWS):  The purpose of California's CWS  
          system is to protect children from abuse and neglect and provide  
          for their health and safety.  When children are identified as  
          being at risk of abuse, neglect or abandonment, county juvenile  
          courts hold legal jurisdiction and children are served by the  
          CWS system through the appointment of a social worker.  Through  
          this system, there are multiple opportunities for the custody of  
          the child, or his or her placement outside of the home, to be  
          evaluated, reviewed and determined by the judicial system, in  
          consultation with the child's social worker, to help provide the  
          best possible services to the child.  The CWS system seeks to  
          help children who have been removed from their homes reunify  
          with their parents or guardians, whenever appropriate, or unite  
          them with other individuals they consider to be family.  There  
          are currently close to 63,000 children and youth in California's  
          child welfare system; over 7,800 of these youth are between the  
          ages of 18 and 20.


          Extended foster care:  Recent changes in federal and state law  
          have facilitated access to extended foster care funding and  
          services for youth between the ages of 18 and 21.  Per the  
          federal Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing  
          Adoptions Act of 2008, and as adopted in state law by AB 12  








                                                                     AB 885


                                                                    Page  6





          (Beall), Chapter 559, Statutes of 2010, California extended  
          foster care to eligible child welfare and probation youth that  
          remain in foster care up to age 21. 


          The federal Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing  
          Adoptions Act of 2008 offered states the option to receive  
          federal financial participation for foster care for eligible  
          nonminor dependents.  It also allowed federal reimbursement for  
          the Kin-GAP program, which serves youth who exit the juvenile  
          dependency system to achieve permanency in the home of a  
          relative caregiver and provides a subsidy to eligible families  
          that is equivalent to the basic foster care rate. 


          For youth who were placed with a relative guardian, or adopted,  
          between the time they were 16 and 18 years old, their guardians  
          or adoptive parents are eligible to receive Kin-GAP or AAP  
          funding, respectively, to provide integral supports and services  
          for the youth until the youth is age 21, providing the youth  
          meets eligibility criteria.  However, sometimes the guardian or  
          adoptive parent fails to continue to provide support to a youth  
          who has turned 18.  This can contribute to increased risk of  
          homelessness and other crisis situations for a youth who, by  
          virtue of being in the child welfare system, has already faced  
          significant troubles. 


          AB 2454 (Quirk-Silva), Chapter 769, Statutes of 2014, sought to  
          address this issue by allowing former foster youth who were  
          placed in guardianship or adopted between the ages of 16 and 18  
          to re-enter the child welfare system if their guardian or  
          adoptive parent fails to provide them with ongoing support and  
          if the parent or guardian is no longer receiving benefits on  
          behalf of the youth.  AB 2454 allows a youth facing the  
          situation, as described, to petition the court and have a judge  
          evaluate his or her circumstances and make a determination as to  
          whether re-entry should be permitted, thereby allowing access to  
          supports and services.








                                                                     AB 885


                                                                    Page  7







          Need for this bill:  The law extending foster care re-entry  
          rights to nonminors currently requires adoptive parents and  
          guardians who are receiving Kin-GAP and AAP benefits,  
          respectively, on behalf of a youth to have those benefits  
          terminated prior to the youth becoming eligible to petition for  
          re-entry.  According to the author, this can create a  
          significant barrier to re-entering foster care, because the  
          youth often has no control over when or whether this funding is  
          terminated.  Also, the author contends that current law bases  
          re-entry on the type of aid that the youth is receiving, and  
          thus inadvertently excludes youth that may have exited to  
          permanency but might not be receiving any benefit or receiving  
          an alternative benefit, like Supplemental Security Income.  




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Daphne Hunt / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089  FN:  
          0002599