BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 891 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 8, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION Patrick O'Donnell, Chair AB 891 (Campos) - As Introduced February 26, 2015 [Note: This bill is doubled referred to the Assembly Human Services Committee and will be heard by that Committee as it relates to issues under its jurisdiction.] SUBJECT: Low-income youth: educational attainment and success SUMMARY: Provides homeless and low-income youth with priority for enrollment in before and after school programs and free transportation to and from school, and requires the Department of Social Services (DSS) to provide youth in families receiving benefits through the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program additional assistance for specified purposes. Specifically, this bill: After School Education and Safety Program (ASES): 1)Prohibits a before school or after school program funded by the ASES Program from charging family fees to a family with a child who is identified as a homeless youth or whose family is part of a CalWORKs assistance unit, if the program charges a fee. AB 891 Page 2 2)Strikes the provision specifying that priority for enrollment of pupils in middle school or junior high school shall be given to pupils who attend daily, and instead establishes the following priorities for enrollment: a) First priority shall go to pupils who are identified as homeless youth, as defined in the federal McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act; b) Second priority shall go to pupils who are members of a CalWORKs assistance unit, as described in the Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) Section 11265.45(a). c) Third priority shall go to pupils who attend daily. Transportation: 3)Specifies that a pupil entitled to free or reduced-price meals or who attends a school that participates in the Community Eligibility Option shall be entitled to free transportation from the local educational agency (LEA) to and from school if either of the following conditions are met: a) The pupil resides more than one-half mile from the school; or, b) The neighborhood through which the pupil must travel to get to school is unsafe because of stray dogs, no sidewalks, known gang activity, or another reason documented by stakeholders . AB 891 Page 3 4)Requires a LEA to designate a liaison that shall be responsible for implementing a plan to ensure that all pupils entitled to free transportation receive the transportation in a timely manner. 5)Requires the liaison to be trained to identify and accommodate the special rights of homeless youth and pupils in a CalWORKs assistance unit. Requires the liaison to facilitate access to school services, including, but not limited to, transportation services. 6)Requires the plan to be developed in consultation with teachers, school administrators, regional local transit authorities, the Air Resources Board, the Department of Transportation, parents, pupils, and other stakeholders. 7)Requires the plan to address the ability of pupils in the LEA's jurisdiction to make regular visits to the public library. 8)Specifies that if no dependable and timely transportation is available for pupils entitled to transportation services, the LEA shall ensure that free transportation be provided using existing funds. CalWORKs: 9)Requires the DSS to, in coordination with the California Department of Education (CDE), identify a method to track the high school completion rates of children in an assistance unit. Requires DSS to report to the Legislature no later than July 1, 2016, if a change in statute is required in order to track high school completion rates of children in an AB 891 Page 4 assistance unit. Requires the DSS to make publicly available an aggregate report of the high school completion rates tracked by the DSS. 10)Specifies that to incentivize completion of high school or the equivalent for recipients of aid 19 years of age and under, those recipients shall, upon verification that the recipient has obtained a high school diploma or its equivalent, receive a $200 supplement to the amount of aid. Requires the supplement to be paid directly to the recipient and be disregarded as income in determining the income of the assistance unit and the income of the CalFresh household if the recipient is receiving CalFresh. Specifies that Cal-Learn participants who are already eligible for a similar incentive are not eligible for the supplement established by this bill. 11)Specifies that to support educational outcomes and physical fitness of children in an assistance unit, a child in an assistance unit shall receive, in advance, a transportation service supplement to the amount of aid paid, as determined by the DSS, to pay for transportation services in order for the child to participate in an ASES program. 12)Specifies that to support educational outcomes of children in an assistance unit, the DSS shall coordinate with county human services agencies and the State Department of Health Care Services to annually inform assistance units of the need to have a child's vision regularly examined and how to schedule an appointment with an optometrist for children receiving Medi-Cal benefits. 13)Requires the DSS to, in consultation with county human services agencies, programs created under the federal Workforce Investment and Opportunity Act, State Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) offices, and local CSBG entities, AB 891 Page 5 design a youth subsidized employment program for youth 15 to 19 years of age, inclusive, who are eligible for benefits, and needy youth. Requires the program to provide paid employment, occupational skills training, and other relevant services. Requires the payment for employment and services to be subject to the same financial participation as payment under WIC Section 11450 (a). 14)Specifies that for the purposes of this bill, "needy youth" means an individual 18 to 24 years of age, inclusive, whose family income, which may include the youth living alone, is less than 200% of the federal poverty level. 15)Requires all employers and caseworkers involved in the employment program to be trained in trauma-informed care and restorative justice practices. 16)Specifies that income earned through the employment program shall be disregarded as income in determining eligibility for, or the amount of, aid. 17)Specifies that notwithstanding the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, and until January 1, 2018, the DSS may implement the DSS provisions of this bill by all-county letters or similar instructions. Thereafter, the DSS shall adopt regulations to implement this bill on or before January 1, 2018. 18)Specifies that no appropriation pursuant to WIC Section 15200 shall be made for purposes of this bill. EXISTING LAW: AB 891 Page 6 1)Establishes the ASES program through the 2002 voter approved initiative, Proposition 49. The ASES program funds the establishment of local after school education and enrichment programs, which are created through partnerships between schools and local community resources to provide literacy, academic enrichment and safe constructive alternatives for students in kindergarten through ninth grade (Education Code (EC) Section 8482). 2)Provides state funding for school district and county office of education transportation costs based on the amount received for that purpose in the prior year, or the agencies' actual transportation costs, whichever is less. Existing law also requires school districts to provide transportation services for special education students if the students' individualized education plans specify such need. (EC Section 41850) FISCAL EFFECT: The Legislative Counsel has keyed this bill as a state-mandated local program. COMMENTS: This bill has three parts, related to services and support for homeless youth and low-income kids. This Committee will review the provisions relating to the ASES program and transportation to and from school. Definition of "homeless youth". The federal McKinney-Vento Act defines "homeless children and youth" as individuals who lack a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence, including children who are sharing the housing of other people, living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camp grounds, emergency or transitional shelters, abandoned in hospitals or awaiting foster care placement, a place not generally used for sleeping, cars, parks, public spaces, abandoned buildings, substandard housing, AB 891 Page 7 bus or train stations, and migratory children living in the circumstances above. ASES. The ASES program, passed by voters as Proposition 49 in 2002, provides almost $550 million annually for before and after school programs for approximately 405,000 kindergarten through grade 9 students. After school programs must commence right after school and at least until 6 p.m. for 15 hours per week. Priority for funding goes to schools where at least 50% of the pupils are eligible for free or reduced-price meals. Each program is required to provide a match equal to not less than one-third of the total grant. Facilities may count towards 25% of the local contribution. Participating after-school programs are required to have an educational and literacy component in which tutoring or homework assistance is provided in one or more of the following areas: language arts, mathematics, history and social science, computer training, or sciences; and an educational enrichment component, which may include, but is not limited to, fine arts, career technical education, career exploration, recreation, physical fitness and prevention activities. The program requires before school programs to operate one and a half hours a day and after school programs to operate after school until 6 p.m. for a minimum of 15 hours per week. What does this bill do? This bill requires priority for enrollment in before and after school programs to be given first to homeless youth, second to pupils who are receiving CalWORKs benefits, and third to pupils who attend daily. The author states that research shows that access to after school and AB 891 Page 8 summer programs improves students' health and academic outcomes, but low-income youth are unable to access these programs due to lack of transportation, long wait lists and program enrollment fees. Priority for enrollment. Current law stipulates that priority for funding should go to programs located at schools where a minimum of 50% of the pupils are eligible for free or reduced-price meals. However, according to the CDE, ASES funds are currently allocated to programs that have an average of 82% of kids eligible for free and reduced-price meals. It is possible that homeless youth and pupils receiving CalWORKs benefits already make up a large portion of the pupils enrolled in ASES. If homeless youth and other low-income kids are unable to access the programs, the reason may be that there are not enough slots. Enrollment decisions are made at the local level between program administrators and the school to accommodate the needs of different communities. Under current law, the priority regarding pupils who attend on a daily basis applies only to pupils in middle or junior high schools. This provision was established to maximize the benefits of the program for older kids who will commit to attending on a regular basis. This bill would apply this priority for all programs. Staff recommends restoring this provision as a third priority only for pupils in middle or junior high schools. Fees. This bill also prohibits programs from collecting fees from homeless youth or youth on CalWORKs. ASES programs are authorized to charge fees, but data is not available because this information is not required to be reported to the CDE. According to the CDE, some programs may charge a nominal enrollment fee, while others may charge fees in order to expand access to the program. AB 891 Page 9 The sponsors, the Western Center on Law and Poverty, the Children's Defense Fund and 9to5, National Association of Working Women, state, "Children who are homeless and living in deep poverty are less likely to be able to participate than children who are not experiencing these significant challenges even when compared to other children who are low-income. This is because children who are homeless or living in deep poverty are less likely to attend the same school from year-to-year and less likely to afford registration fees required by some afterschool programs. This means that children who could benefit most from having a safe and supportive place to learn, exercise, and benefit from afterschool snacks are less likely to be able to participate." Transportation. Until the enactment of the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), home-to-school transportation was a categorical program that reimbursed school districts and county offices of education (COEs) for prior year approved transportation costs. Funding for transportation is one of the few funding streams that did not get rolled into the LCFF. Instead, districts and COEs continue to receive, outside of their LCFF funding, the same amount of transportation funding they received in the year immediately preceding the enactment of the LCFF, 2012-13. Districts and COEs receiving those funds must continue to spend them on transportation. The amount received by districts and COEs varies widely. Some get more than 90% of their approved costs reimbursed with state funding. Others get no state funding at all, even though they have approved costs. The statewide average reimbursement is about 35% of approved costs. Because the amount received by districts is held flat, transportation funding does not keep pace with inflation and, over time, becomes less related to actual workload. Some urban AB 891 Page 10 districts provide home-to-school transportation. Others do not, and rely instead on public transit. What does this bill do? This bill requires a LEA to provide all students eligible for free or reduced-price meals, or who attends a school that participates in the Community Eligibility Option, free transportation to and from school if the pupil lives more than half a mile from school, or if the neighborhood the pupil must travel to get to and from school is unsafe due to stray dogs, lack of sidewalks, known gang activity, or another reason documented by stakeholders. According to the CDE, there are 3.7 million pupils (almost 60% of all pupils) eligible for free and reduced-price meals. The bill requires the LEA to appoint a liaison, who is trained to identify and accommodate the rights of homeless youth and pupils receiving CalWORKs benefits, to be responsible for developing a plan for implementation. The liaison is required to consult stakeholders, including teachers, school administrators, local transportation and environmental authorities, parents, pupils, and others. According to the sponsors, the inclusion of a wide range of stakeholders, including local agencies, will help to identify a range of resources to ensure transportation needs are met. For example, local transit authorities may be able to provide bus passes at no charge. Staff recommends an amendment to specify that the plan may include the identification of all options, including non-education resources. The plan is also required to address the ability of pupils' to make regular visits to the public library, which the sponsors argue is important for a student's ability to complete school work (e.g., research reports). Requiring transportation for visits to the public library would result in a higher level of transportation service. Implementation of this provision of the bill may be challenging. LEAs will be required to identify whether each student eligible AB 891 Page 11 for free or reduced-price meals lives more than one half mile from school, or investigate the route each student takes to school and determine whether stray dogs, lack of sidewalks or gang activities make the route unsafe. A school district will be required to make this determination for every pupil at a school if the school participates in the federal food program's Community Eligibility Option, which allows school districts to provide breakfast and lunch to all pupils at a school or district where at least 40% of the identified students were deemed eligible through eligibility for CalWORKs or CalFresh in the prior year. Districts located in rural areas will face unique challenges as students may live miles from a school and public transportation may not be readily available. Can transportation issues be addressed through the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP)? The Committee may wish to consider whether transportation issues can be addressed through a school district's LCAP. LCFF funds can be used for any purpose in accordance with the LCAP, which is developed locally to meet the needs of each district. The LCAP is required to meet eight state priorities. One of the priorities is "pupil engagement," as measured by factors such as school attendance rate and chronic absenteeism rate. School districts have an incentive to ensure that students are not absent in order to get average daily attendance (ADA). If transportation is identified as the barrier to attendance and the cause of chronic absenteeism, it could be funded through a district's LCFF allocation. The author may wish to consider strategies to encourage school districts to consider transportation barriers in the development of their LCAP. The author states that the inability to afford transportation from school is one of the most frequently cited barriers that low-income youth face in attending school. According to the author, a survey of Oakland youth found that 61% of students reported they sometimes use their lunch money to ride the bus. The author further states that other states, including New AB 891 Page 12 Jersey, New York and Missouri, guarantee transportation for students who live beyond a certain distance from their school. Technical and clarifying amendments: 1)Staff recommends striking, on page 7, lines 3 to 6 of the bill, "The liaison shall facilitate access to school services including, but not limited to, transportation services for the pupils described in this paragraph." This provision may be interpreted as requiring the liaison to be responsible for more than just transportation services. According to the sponsor, this is not the intent and was inadvertently left in the bill from an earlier draft. 2)The provision in Section 39800.1(d) is unclear. According to the sponsor, the provision is intended to specify that existing funds are to be used after determining that no free dependable and timely transportation is available. Staff recommends inserting "free" on line 15 after "no" on page 7. Related legislation. AB 379 (Gordon), which passed this Committee on March 25, 2015, makes complaints alleging violations of certain educational rights afforded to students who are homeless subject to the Uniform Complaint Procedures. AB 982 (Eggman), pending in the Assembly Human Services Committee, gives homeless children priority for enrollment in subsidized child care and development programs. AB 1166 (Bloom), pending in this Committee, allows students in foster care and those who are homeless to be eligible for the exemption from local graduation requirements even if they are AB 891 Page 13 not notified of this right within 30 days of enrollment, and allows homeless students to be exempt even if they are no longer homeless or if they transfer to another school or district. SB 445 (Liu), pending in the Senate Education Committee, requires a LEA to allow a homeless child to continue his or her education in his or her school of origin through the duration of his or her homelessness, and provides a right to immediate enrollment. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Children's Defense Fund - CA (co-sponsor) Western Center on Law & Poverty (co-sponsor) 9to5, National Association of Working Women (co-sponsor) Building Healthy Communities: Long Beach California Catholic Conference California Pan-Ethnic Health Network Courage Campaign AB 891 Page 14 InnerCity Struggle Khmer Girls in Action Lynwood Unified School District National Association of Social Workers Our Family Coalition PolicyLink Success in Challenges Youth Justice Coalition Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by:Sophia Kwong Kim / ED. / (916) 319-2087 AB 891 Page 15