BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 906| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 906 Author: Cooper (D) Amended: 7/16/15 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE: 10-1, 7/14/15 AYES: Beall, Cannella, Allen, Bates, Galgiani, Leyva, McGuire, Mendoza, Roth, Wieckowski NOES: Gaines ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 57-17, 6/2/15 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Sacramento Regional Transit District SOURCE: City of Elk Grove DIGEST: This bill deletes the reference in existing law to how the City of Elk Grove's proportionate share of the costs to operate a regional transit service is determined. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Establishes the Sacramento Regional Transit District (Sacramento RT) to operate a single unified public transportation system in the Sacramento region in order to meet the present and future public transportation, and mass and rapid transit, needs of the region. AB 906 Page 2 2)Defines member entities of the Sacramento RT as cities or counties that are annexed to the district. 3)Defines participating entities of the Sacramento RT as cities or counties that are not annexed to the district, but that enter into an agreement with Sacramento RT that includes appointing a member to the board of directors. 4)Authorizes a participating entity to appoint at least one member to the Sacramento RT board of directors if it enters into an agreement providing for the following: a) The participating entity agrees to pay its proportionate share of costs to provide rail or other districtwide transit services. b) Sacramento RT agrees to maintain a specified level of service. c) Sacramento RT is not obligated to provide transit services to any particular location or along any particular route. 1)Specifies that the City of Elk Grove's proportionate share is to be determined in the manner provided by an agreement between the city and Sacramento RT dated March 17, 2004. This bill deletes the reference in existing law to how the City of Elk Grove's proportionate share of the costs to operate a regional transit service is determined. Comments Purpose. According to the author, Elk Grove's proportionate share payment is based on outdated state law and does not take into account fiscal contributions from Elk Grove residents through Measure A, a countywide sales tax measure that provides roughly $35 million per year for transit service throughout the county. The author suggests that existing law makes Elk Grove pay twice for a seat on the Sacramento RT board and that no other city in the region pays twice for its regional transit use. This bill seeks to remedy this problem. AB 906 Page 3 Compromise. This bill initially faced opposition from Sacramento RT for a number of reasons. This bill, however, was amended to strike a compromise between Sacramento RT and the City of Elk Grove. Existing law specifies how Elk Grove's proportionate share is to be determined, and bases it on an agreement from 2004. At the time, Elk Grove was much smaller and Sacramento RT provided all transit service to the city. Today, Elk Grove is the second largest city in the county and operates its own transit system. In fact, after September 2015, Sacramento RT will not operate any service to or in Elk Grove. This bill strikes a balance and deletes the reference in existing law to how Elk Grove's proportionate share is determined and instead allows them to negotiate their contribution to the Sacramento RT the same way the other participating entities do. With these amendments, Sacramento RT removed their opposition to the bill. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified8/11/15) City of Elk Grove (source) OPPOSITION: (Verified8/11/15) None received ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 57-17, 6/2/15 AYES: Alejo, Baker, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gray, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, Medina, Mullin, Nazarian, O'Donnell, Olsen, Perea, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Thurmond, Weber, Wilk, AB 906 Page 4 Williams, Wood, Atkins NOES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Bigelow, Brough, Cooley, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Gatto, Gordon, Harper, Jones, McCarty, Obernolte, Patterson, Mark Stone, Ting, Wagner NO VOTE RECORDED: Chang, Chávez, Grove, Melendez, Quirk, Waldron Prepared by:Alison Dinmore & Eric Thronson / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121 8/13/15 13:10:12 **** END ****