BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                       AB 913


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          913 (Santiago)


          As Amended  April 9, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                   |Noes               |
          |                |      |                       |                   |
          |                |      |                       |                   |
          |----------------+------+-----------------------+-------------------|
          |Higher          |12-0  |Medina, Baker, Bloom,  |                   |
          |Education       |      |Harper, Irwin,         |                   |
          |                |      |Jones-Sawyer, Levine,  |                   |
          |                |      |Linder, Low, Santiago, |                   |
          |                |      |Weber, Williams        |                   |
          |                |      |                       |                   |
          |                |      |                       |                   |
          |----------------+------+-----------------------+-------------------|
          |Public Safety   |7-0   |Quirk, Melendez,       |                   |
          |                |      |Jones-Sawyer, Lackey,  |                   |
          |                |      |Low, Santiago, Weber   |                   |
          |                |      |                       |                   |
          |                |      |                       |                   |
          |----------------+------+-----------------------+-------------------|
          |Appropriations  |17-0  |Gomez, Bigelow, Bloom, |                   |
          |                |      |Bonta, Calderon,       |                   |
          |                |      |Chang, Daly, Eggman,   |                   |
          |                |      |Gallagher, Eduardo     |                   |
          |                |      |Garcia, Holden, Jones, |                   |
          |                |      |Quirk, Rendon, Wagner, |                   |
          |                |      |Weber, Wood            |                   |








                                                                       AB 913


                                                                      Page  2





          |                |      |                       |                   |
          |                |      |                       |                   |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Provides for changes to the written jurisdictional  
          agreements between postsecondary educational institutions and  
          local law enforcement.  Specifically, this bill: 


          1)Requires the governing board of each community college district  
            (CCD), the Trustees of the California State University (CSU),  
            the Regents of the University of California (UC) and the  
            governing board of independent postsecondary institutions to  
            update their existing written jurisdictional agreements with  
            local law enforcement for investigation of Part 1 violent crimes  
            to include sexual assaults and hate crimes by July 1, 2016; 


          2)Requires written agreements to be reviewed, and updated if  
            necessary, every five years;


          3)Defines "hate crime" to mean any offense described in Penal Code  
            Section 422.55; and, defines "sexual assault" to include, but  
            not be limited to, rape, forced sodomy, forced oral copulation,  
            rape by a foreign object, sexual battery, or threat of any of  
            these.


          4)Deletes provisions requiring agreements be in place by July 1,  
            1999, and submitted to the Legislative Analyst by September 1,  
            1999.


          5)Provides for reimbursement if the State Mandates Commission  
            determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state.










                                                                       AB 913


                                                                      Page  3





          EXISTING LAW:  Requires, under the Kristen Smart Campus Safety  
          Act, UC Regents, CSU Trustees, CCD governing boards, and  
          independent colleges that meet specified conditions to enter into  
          specific written agreements, by July 1, 1999, with local law  
          enforcement agencies regarding the coordination and  
          responsibilities for investigating Part 1 violent crimes which  
          occur on campus.  


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, costs for each campus to modify their agreements with  
          local law enforcement agencies to incorporate investigations for  
          sexual assaults and hate crimes, and to review every five years,  
          should be minor and absorbable.  For most community colleges, the  
          mandated costs for this activity should not exceed $1,000, and  
          thus would not result in a claim for reimbursement.


          COMMENTS:  Background.  College students who are victims of sexual  
          assault are entitled to the protections and services provided to  
          victims of the general population (law enforcement investigation,  
          rape crisis center services, district attorney criminal  
          prosecutions, etc.) and to the services and remedies required to  
          be provided by colleges and universities under state and federal  
          laws.  In recent years, there has been an increasing public  
          awareness of sexual harassment and assault occurring on and near  
          college campuses.  State and federal governments have responded  
          through laws and regulations that seek to strengthen partnerships  
          between colleges and local law enforcement agencies (for criminal  
          prosecutions) and to improve campus handling of sexual assault  
          complaints (for campus-based remedies).    


          Campus based requirements and remedies required under federal law.  
           Pursuant to Title IX of the Higher Education Amendments of 1972  
          and the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and  
          Campus Crime Statistics Act, postsecondary educational  
          institutions that receive federal financial aid are required to  
          disclose information about crimes on and around campuses (Clery  








                                                                       AB 913


                                                                      Page  4





          Act) as well as establish certain rights for victims of sexual  
          assault (Title IX).  Title IX prohibits sex based discrimination  
          in education.  If an institution knows, or reasonably should know  
          about discrimination, harassment or violence that is creating a  
          "hostile environment" for any student, it must act to eliminate  
          it, remedy the harm caused, and prevent its recurrence.  The  
          rights provided under Title IX include notification to victims of  
          the right to file a complaint, available counseling services, the  
          results of disciplinary proceedings, and the option for victims to  
          change their academic schedule or living arrangements, and  
          requires postsecondary institutions to offer prevention and  
          awareness programs to new students and employees regarding rape,  
          domestic and dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.  


          Purpose of this bill.  The author argues steps must be taken to  
          ensure allegations of campus sexual assault are appropriately  
          responded to and investigated; cooperation between campus and  
          local law enforcement on sexual assault is critical.  The author  
          notes that the White House Task Force to Protect Students from  
          Sexual Assault recommended campus and local law enforcement  
          agencies establish written agreements regarding campus sexual  
          assault.  California law requires written agreements between local  
          law enforcement and campuses regarding investigations of Part 1  
          violent crimes.  However, existing California law does not require  
          these agreements clarify responsibilities on non-Part 1 sexual  
          assault or hate crimes.  This bill specifically requires the  
          written agreements between campus law enforcement and local law  
          enforcement to designate the agency responsible for investigation  
          of sexual assaults and hate crimes.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
                          Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960  FN:  
          0000410










                                                                       AB 913


                                                                      Page  5