BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Senator Ricardo Lara, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Session AB 953 (Weber) - Law enforcement: racial profiling ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Version: June 30, 2015 |Policy Vote: PUB. S. 5 - 1 | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Urgency: No |Mandate: Yes | | | | |--------------------------------+--------------------------------| | | | |Hearing Date: August 27, 2015 |Consultant: Jolie Onodera | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- *********** ANALYSIS ADDENDUM - SUSPENSE FILE *********** The following information is revised to reflect amendments adopted by the committee on August 27, 2015 Bill Summary: AB 953 would enact the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015, which would do the following: Pursuant to a specified phased-in schedule based on the number of peace officers employed by an agency, require each state and local agency that employs peace officers to collect and annually report data to the Attorney General (AG) on all "stops," as defined, for the preceding calendar year. Modify the definition of "racial profiling," as specified. Commencing July 1, 2016, require the AG to establish the Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory Board (RIPA), to conduct specified activities and issue a report annually on its analysis of specified reported data, training, and racial and identity profiling policies/practices. Fiscal Impact: AB 953 (Weber) Page 1 of ? Data collection, reporting, retention, and training : Major future one-time and ongoing costs, potentially in the millions to tens of millions of dollars annually, once fully phased in, to local law enforcement agencies for data collection, reporting, and retention requirements specified in the bill. Additional costs for training on the process would likely be required. There are currently 482 cities and 58 counties in California. To the extent local agency expenditures qualify as a reimbursable state mandate, agencies could claim reimbursement of those costs (General Fund). While costs could vary widely, for context, the Commission on State Mandates' statewide cost estimate for Crime Statistics Reports for the DOJ reflects eligible reimbursement of over $13.6 million per year for slightly over 50 percent of local agencies reporting. DOJ impact : Major one-time and ongoing costs of $2.6 million in 2015-16, $5.9 million in 2016-17, and $5.1 million (General Fund) annually thereafter, for resources to create the database to collect and retain the data, complete data collection and reporting requirements. Minor, absorbable impact to aggregate and post annual reports received to its website. RIPA : One-time costs of $1.7 million in 2015-16, and $3 million (General Fund) in 2016-17 and 2017-18 to establish and oversee activities of the Board. Ongoing costs of $1.5 million annually (General Fund) for activities including analyzing data, issuing annual reports, reviewing policies and procedures, and holding at least three annual public meetings. CHP impact : Potentially significant one-time costs of about $1 million (Motor Vehicle Account) to modify its existing database, create the program to generate the report, and train personnel. Ongoing increase in workload costs potentially in the range of $250,000 to $500,000 (Motor Vehicle Account) for data collection and reporting activities. Data for 2013-14 from the CHP indicates approximately 3.1 million enforcement actions potentially subject to the data collection and reporting provisions of this bill. CSU/UC police impact : Potentially significant ongoing non-reimbursable costs to California State University police and University of California police officers - the CSM has determined CSU and UC use of campus police is a discretionary act, and therefore any mandated costs are not subject to state reimbursement. AB 953 (Weber) Page 2 of ? Author Amendments: Phase-in the mandated data reporting requirement on law enforcement agencies, as follows: o Each agency that employs 1,000 or more peace officers shall issue its first round of reports on or before April 1, 2019. o Each agency that employs 667 or more but less than 1,000 peace officers shall issue its first round of reports on or before April 1, 2020. o Each agency that employs 334 or more but less than 667 peace officers shall issue its first round of reports on or before April 1, 2022. o Each agency that employs one or more but less than 334 peace officers shall issue its first round of reports on or before April 1, 2023. Delete the provision requiring any peace officer who has a complaint of racial or identity profiling that is sustained to participate in training to correct racial and identity profiling at least every six months for two years. Delete the provision requiring reporting agencies to retain data records for a minimum of five years. Delete the overlapping requirement of data analysis by both the AG and the RIPA to specify the RIPA will retain this responsibility. Revise the RIPA membership, as specified, specify a term of four years for RIPA members, and specify that members of RIPA shall not receive compensation, nor per diem expenses, for their services as RIPA members. Specify that no action of RIPA shall be valid unless agreed to by a majority of its members. Make other technical and clarifying changes. -- END --