BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 960 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 960 (Chiu) As Amended April 28, 2015 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------| |Judiciary |10-0 |Mark Stone, Wagner, | | | | |Alejo, Chau, Chiu, | | | | |Gallagher, Cristina | | | | |Garcia, Holden, | | | | |Maienschein, | | | | |O'Donnell | | ------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Makes more uniform rules regarding recognition of parentage for children conceived using donated sperm or eggs for intended parents and for donors. Specifically, this bill: 1)Provides that if a woman conceives through assisted reproduction with semen, ova (egg) or both donated by someone other than her spouse, with the consent of the other intended parent, that other intended parent is treated as if he or she were the natural parent of the child. Requires that the intended parent's consent be in writing, signed by the intended parent and the woman conceiving. AB 960 Page 2 2)Removes the requirement that, in order for a sperm donor not to be considered the father of a child thereby conceived, a doctor must be used for the assisted reproduction. Provides instead that if sperm is donated to someone other than the donor's spouse: a) If a doctor is used in the assisted reproduction, the donor is treated as though he were not the parent, unless otherwise agreed in a writing signed prior to conception by the donor and the woman. b) If a doctor is not used in the assisted reproduction, the donor is treated as though he were not the parent if either: i) the donor and the woman agreed in a writing signed prior to conception that he would not be a parent; or ii) a court finds satisfactory evidence, prior to conception, that the donor and the women intended to conceive through assisted reproduction and that both the donor and the woman did not intend for the donor to be a parent. 3)Provides that the donor of egg for use in assisted reproduction by a woman other than the donor's spouse or nonmarital partner is treated as if she were not the natural parent of the child thereby conceived, unless the court finds satisfactory evidence that the donor and the woman intended for the donor to be a parent. 4)Revises the optional California Statutory Forms for Assisted Reproduction based on the changes set forth in 1) and 2) above. 5)Creates a new optional form for "Intended Parents Using a Known Sperm or Egg Donor to Conceive a Child" for those parties wishing to establish that the sperm and/or egg donors are not intended to be the parents of the child. AB 960 Page 3 EXISTING LAW: 1)Establishes the California Uniform Parentage Act. Defines a parent and child relationship as the legal relationship between a child and the child's natural or adoptive parents incident to which the law confers or imposes rights, privileges, duties and obligations. 2)Defines "assisted reproduction" as conception by any means other than sexual intercourse. Defines "assisted reproduction agreement" as a written contract that includes a person who intends to be the legal parent of a child born through assisted reproduction and defines the terms of the relationship between the parties to the contract. 3)Provides that the child of a wife who is living with her husband, who is not sterile, is conclusively presumed to be a child of the marriage, except as provided. 4)Provides that the spouse of a woman who, with the consent of her spouse, conceives through assisted reproduction with the sperm of a man other than her spouse, is treated in law as though he or she is the child's natural parent. Requires that the spouse's consent be in writing and signed by both spouses. 5)Provides that a donor of semen to a licensed physician or sperm bank for use in assisted reproduction of a woman other than the donor's spouse is treated in law as if he were not the natural parent of the child thereby conceived, unless otherwise agreed to in a writing signed by the donor and the woman prior to the conception of the child. AB 960 Page 4 FISCAL EFFECT: None COMMENTS: Legal parenthood can be established in a number of different ways. A person is conclusively presumed to be the parent of a child if he or she was married to, or in a registered domestic partnership with, and cohabitating with the child's parent, except as specified. A person who receives a child into his or her home and holds the child out as his or her own is also presumed a parent of the child. A person who signs a voluntary declaration of paternity is presumed to be the legal parent of a child. Most recently, SB 274 (Leno), Chapter 564, Statutes of 2013, allowed a court, where there are more than two people who have established claims or presumptions of parentage under existing California law, to recognize more than two parents, but only if it would be detrimental to the child not to do so. For couples using assisted reproduction to conceive children, establishing parentage often requires a review of the parties' intent at the time of conception. This bill seeks to clarify and simplify those rules to ensure that intended parents, as well as sperm and egg donors who do not intend to parent, are recognized as such by the law. Current Parentage Law on Sperm Donors and its Difficulties for Families. Today California law treats sperm donors differently depending on whether the intended parents are married and on whether the assisted reproduction occurs with the help of a doctor/sperm bank, or not. Absent a signed agreement prior to conception, existing California law deems that an individual who donates semen to a physician or licensed sperm bank for use by a woman who is not the donor's wife as if he were not the natural father of the child thereby conceived. If the donor intends to parent the child, he must sign an agreement stating so prior to the child's conception. A donor who does not use a physician or licensed sperm bank is treated as the child's parent, regardless of his stated intention. As a result, parties are required to spend hundreds or thousands of dollars for doctor or sperm bank AB 960 Page 5 assistance in order to ensure that the intended parents' and the donors' intents are recognized. This is not a problem for egg donation, where medical intervention is required to complete the donation. However for sperm donation, the reality is that many woman or couples trying to conceive a child with the help of a known sperm donor avoid any medical expense and inseminate at home without use of a doctor or a sperm bank. As long as no one challenges this, there are likely no complications. But if something happens, significant legal problems can arise for both the donor and the intended parents. For example, if the mother ends up on public assistance, the donor, who will likely be legally recognized as the child's parent, may be responsible for child support. Likewise, if the donor changes his mind and wants to have more involvement in the child's life, he may be able to get custody of the child, even against the wishes of the intended parents. This Bill Seeks to Have Similar Rules Apply to Married and Unmarried Couples and to Those Who Use Medical Assistance and Those Who Do Not. This bill seeks to streamline and simplify rules regarding parentage in assisted reproductions cases involving both egg and sperm donors and ensure that intended parents are legal parents and donors are donors by: 1)Allowing an unmarried couple using a sperm donor to conceive a child to ensure that the intended parent who is not giving birth is the child's legal parent from the moment of the child's birth. This will help immediately effectuate the intentions of unmarried couples and provide them and their children immediate recognition. 2)Making provisions gender neutral so that a spouse in a same-sex marriage will be considered the parent of a child conceived through egg and/or sperm donation to her spouse, if that spouse AB 960 Page 6 consents. While a pre-conception writing is required to demonstrate that consent, this bill no longer requires that the doctor participate in that process (see 5), below). 3)Clarifying that an egg donor, who is not the spouse or nonmarital partner of the woman conceiving with the donation, is not the parent unless the courts finds sufficient evidence that she intended to be the parent. This provision codifies the California Supreme Court's holding in K.M. v. E.G. (2005) 37 Cal.4th 130, in which the court recognized that a woman who provided her ova to her partner with the intention of conceiving children together was the parent of the twins so conceived. In addition, this is generally consistent with the treatment of sperm donors. 4)Continuing existing law that a sperm donor donating to a woman other than his spouse, using a doctor or licensed sperm bank, is considered a parent unless he and the woman sign an agreement otherwise prior to conception. Thus, the sperm donor donating through a doctor or a sperm bank is not the father, unless he agrees otherwise in writing. 5)Creating basically the opposite standard for sperm donors who do not use a doctor or sperm bank - they may be parents unless they agree otherwise prior to conception. Given the complexities of parentage laws and parentage presumptions, this bill rightly does not provide that these men are definitely parents, which could exclude other legal or presumed parents. Instead, the bill states that if a doctor or sperm bank is not used, these donors are only treated as donors - and not parents - if either: a) the donor and the woman agreed in a writing signed prior to conception that he would not be a parent; or b) a court finds satisfactory evidence, prior to conception, that the donor and the women intended to conceive through assisted reproduction and that both the donor and the woman did not intend for the donor to be a parent. Thus, these donors are most likely parents, AB 960 Page 7 unless they agree otherwise - whether in writing or though other evidence - prior to conception. This is this bill's most significant change to the law. Today donors who do not use a doctor are very likely to be considered parents, regardless of the parties' intent. This change is designed to effectuate two important purposes. First, it will give clear instructions on how to legally recognize parties' intentions with respect to parentage. Parties who want to be parents can follow the rules to be recognized as such, and donors who want to be donors can do the same. Second, it will allow prospective parents and donors, who want to remain donors, to follow clear rules and conceive at home using donated sperm, without the expense of a doctor or a sperm bank, which today's law requires. Legislation Last Year Created Optional Statutory Forms to Assist Intended Parents and Donors Using Assisted Reproduction and This Bill Clarifies and Expands Those Forms. Last year, AB 2344 (Ammiano), Chapter 636, Statutes of 2014, created optional forms to allow intended parents to state, in writing, their intention to parent a child being conceived through use of assisted reproduction and also to let donors state their intention not to parent - basically to effectuate the requirement for evidence of the parties' intent required by the sperm and egg donation statute, discussed above. These forms are strictly optional - intended parents may evidence their intent using any other writing or other evidence, as provided. Moreover, because parentage laws can be very complicated, the forms do not - nor can they - disestablish the parentage rights of any other person or affect other presumptions of parentage. They just evidence the intent of the parties executing the forms. The forms created last year address the following situations: AB 960 Page 8 1)Married spouses who are using assisted reproduction to conceive and one partner will be giving birth. 2)Unmarried, intended parents using sperm donated from one of the intended parents. 3)Intended parents conceiving a child with eggs donated from one of them, while the other will give birth. This bill updates the existing forms consistent with the changes that this bill makes to egg and sperm donors. In addition, this bill creates a new form, entitled "Intended Parent(s) Using a Known Sperm and/or Egg Donor(s) to Conceive a Child," designed to help intended parents who are using a known sperm and/or egg donor and do not wish for the donor to be a parent. This form is designed to help those families who use a known donor who does not intend to be a parent, but choose to perform the assisted reproduction without aid of a doctor or a sperm bank. Analysis Prepared by: Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 FN: 0000262 AB 960 Page 9