BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 976 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 18, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION Philip Ting, Chair AB 976 Steinorth - As Amended May 7, 2015 Majority vote. Tax levy. Fiscal committee. SUBJECT: Personal income tax: deductions: qualified pet adoption costs. SUMMARY: Allows a deduction, not to exceed $100, for qualified costs paid or incurred adopting a pet from a qualified animal rescue organization. Specifically, this bill: 1)Allows, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2016, and before January 1, 2021, a deduction, under the Personal Income Tax (PIT) Law, equal to the "qualified costs" paid or incurred by a taxpayer for the adoption of a "qualified pet" from a "qualified animal rescue organization." AB 976 Page 2 2)Limits the deduction allowed for a taxable year to $100. 3)Defines a "qualified pet" as either of the following animals adopted from a qualified animal rescue organization that is not used by the taxpayer in a trade or business or for the production of income: a) A pet over that age of four, as determined by the qualified animal rescue organization; or, b) A cat. 4)Defines a "qualified animal rescue organization" as a public animal control agency or shelter, humane society shelter, or rescue group. 5)Defines "qualified costs" as amounts paid or incurred to a qualified animal rescue organization to adopt a pet, not to exceed $100. 6)Defines "rescue group" as an organization exempt from federal income taxation, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3), whose primary purpose is the placement of dogs, cats, or other animals that have been removed from a public animal control agency or shelter, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelter, or humane society, or that have been surrendered or relinquished to the rescue group by the previous owner. 7)Repeals the statutory provision authorizing the deduction on AB 976 Page 3 December 1, 2021. 8)Takes effect immediately as a tax levy. EXISTING LAW: 1)Allows, under the PIT, in modified conformity with federal income tax laws various deductions in computing the income that is subject to the taxes imposed by that law, including miscellaneous itemized deductions that are allowed only to the extent that the aggregate amount of those deductions exceed 2% of adjusted gross income (AGI). 2)Allows for the deduction of certain expenses to arrive at a taxpayer's AGI. These expenses include certain trade and business expenses, losses from the sale or exchange of certain property, alimony, and moving expenses. Thus, all taxpayers with these types of expenses receive the benefit of a deduction, regardless of whether the taxpayer itemizes deductions or uses the standard deduction. These deductions are known as "above-the-line" deductions. FISCAL EFFECT: The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) estimates General Fund revenue loss of $100,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2016-17, and $100,000 in FY 2017-18, and $100,000 in FY 2018-19. COMMENTS: 1)Authors Statement . The author has provided the following statement in support of this bill: AB 976 represents a modest investment towards supporting AB 976 Page 4 our local governments and animal shelters. California taxpayers currently spend over $120 million to support local animal shelters for the ~ 800,000 pets they serve each year. Overcrowding poses constant pressure upon shelters to reduce their intake and holding time; the simplest way to combat the problem is to increase adoption rates. Shelters have testified that providing discounted prices for adoption have effectively increased their adoption rates. While not an identical offer, it is reasonable to infer that an ongoing financial incentive in the form of a tax deduction will have a similarly positive effect in increasing animal adoptions. Increasing animal adoptions will help to relieve local governments of the substantial cost pressure placed upon them to support shelters. Rather than distributing additional local government dollars to animal shelters, a tax deduction places the power in the taxpayer's hands to reduce their cost share. It is critical that the state do its part in encouraging animal adoptions in an effort to both reduce the cost to the public and save lives. 2)Arguments in Support : The Humane Society states that "[w]hile the tax deduction provision that AB 976 would create cannot address all that ails our state's homeless pets and the AB 976 Page 5 agencies vested with looking out for their interests, it is a relatively inexpensive and efficient way to send a strong message to California taxpayers: that never before has their compassion been more critical to improving the chances for animals who have done nothing wrong other than prove too expensive for their downtrodden owners. AB 976 asks Californians to help out, and by promoting the benefits - to the animals and to the government and charitable sectors - of adopting rather than purchasing dogs and cats, the deduction would increase the ability of municipal and charitable animal protection organizations to continue their life-saving work." The Humane Society further states that "the cost associated with AB 976's provisions is modest when compared to the potential for increased economic activity, reduced animal sheltering costs and improved agency revenues, and lower health and welfare expenses. Only very small increases in the number of pet adoptions would be necessary to demonstrate the investment value of providing this deduction." 3)Arguments in Opposition : The California Tax Reform Association states that "[w]hile the intention of this bill is reasonable, the legislature has previously rejected the use of tax credits and deductions for animal adoption. Promoting the adoption of animals from animal rescue organizations through the mechanism of a tax deduction is poor public policy." The California Tax Reform Association further states that the deduction is poor public policy because the deduction is only relevant to those who earn enough income to itemize, and the choice of adopting a pet is properly motivated by compassion, not finances. 4)What is a "tax expenditure" ? Existing law provides various credits, deductions, exclusions, and exemptions for particular taxpayer groups. In the late 1960s, U.S. Treasury officials began arguing that these features of the tax law should be referred to as "expenditures" since they are generally enacted to accomplish some governmental purpose and there is a determinable cost associated with each (in the form of foregone revenues). This bill enacts a new tax expenditure AB 976 Page 6 program, in the form of a PIT deduction, to encourage the adoption of pets from qualified animal rescue organizations. 5)How is a tax expenditure different from a direct expenditure ? As the Department of Finance notes in its annual Tax Expenditure Report, there are several key differences between tax expenditures and direct expenditures. First, tax expenditures are reviewed less frequently than direct expenditures once they are put in place. This can offer taxpayers greater certainty, but it can also result in tax expenditures remaining a part of the tax code without demonstrating any public benefit. Second, there is generally no control over the amount of revenue losses associated with any given tax expenditure. Finally, it should also be noted that, once enacted, it takes a two-thirds vote to rescind an existing tax expenditure absent a sunset date. This effectively results in a "one-way ratchet" whereby tax expenditures can be conferred by majority vote, but cannot be rescinded, irrespective of their efficacy, without a supermajority vote. 6)Above/Below the Line Deduction : An above-the-line deduction is a deduction that allows a taxpayer to subtract amounts from gross income when calculating their "adjusted gross income." If the deduction is taken above the line, it is used to determine the taxpayer's AGI. An above-the-line deduction can be taken by any taxpayer regardless of whether the taxpayer itemizes. Moreover, an above-the-line deduction reduces AGI, and having a smaller AGI can lower many subsequent calculations which will further reduce taxes. As a result, above-the-line deductions are more advantageous than those taken below the line. Once AGI is determined, a taxpayer can either itemize deductions or take the standard deduction, whichever is greater. Once itemized deductions exceed the standard deduction, other smaller deductions, such as miscellaneous expenses, can be applied to increase tax savings. However, in order to take advantage of a AB 976 Page 7 miscellaneous deduction, total expenses must exceed 2% of AGI. Other deductions provide their own AGI threshold. 7)Incentive or reward ? Generally, tax expenditures are enacted to encourage socially beneficial behavior that would not take place without a financial incentive. As noted above, this bill establishes a deduction to encourage the adoption of pets from qualified animal rescue organizations. It would be difficult to find a person who did not consider this a worthy goal. At the same time, however, this bill limits the deduction amount to $100 per taxable year. Applying a marginal tax rate of 9.3%, this would translate to a tax break of less than $10. The Committee may wish to consider whether such an incentive is likely to encourage people to engage in "new" behavior, or whether it would simply reward people who would have adopted a pet in the absence of a deduction. Additionally, given that less than one-half of individual California taxpayers itemize their deductions; and given the overall cap on total itemized deductions under the personal income tax law, this clarification would result in many fewer taxpayers being eligible to claim the deduction, and therefore significantly lower impact to GF revenue. 8)Prior Legislation : a) AB 2326 (Dickinson), of the 2013-14 Legislative Session, would have allowed a deduction for qualified costs paid or incurred adopting a pet from a qualified animal rescue organization. AB 2326 was held on the Assembly Committee on Appropriations' Suspense File. b) AB 233 (Smyth), of the 2009-10 Legislative Session, would have allowed a deduction for qualified costs paid or incurred by a taxpayer for the adoption of a pet from a qualified animal rescue organization. AB 233 was held on the Assembly Committee on Appropriations' Suspense File. AB 976 Page 8 REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support Humane Society of the United States Opposition American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees California Tax Reform Association Analysis Prepared by:Carlos Anguiano / REV. & TAX. / (916) 319-2098 AB 976 Page 9