BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                       AB 988


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          988 (Mark Stone and Atkins)


          As Amended  June 1, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                  |Noes                |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
          |----------------+------+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Water           |12-2  |Levine, Dababneh,     |Beth Gaines, Harper |
          |                |      |Dahle, Dodd, Cristina |                    |
          |                |      |Garcia, Gomez, Lopez, |                    |
          |                |      |Mathis, Medina,       |                    |
          |                |      |Rendon, Salas,        |                    |
          |                |      |Williams              |                    |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
          |----------------+------+----------------------+--------------------|
          |Appropriations  |12-1  |Gomez, Bonta,         |Bigelow             |
          |                |      |Calderon, Daly,       |                    |
          |                |      |Eggman, Eduardo       |                    |
          |                |      |Garcia, Gordon,       |                    |
          |                |      |Holden, Quirk,        |                    |
          |                |      |Rendon, Weber, Wood   |                    |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
          |                |      |                      |                    |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Requires the Department of Parks & Recreation (DPR) to  
          establish an Outdoor Environmental Education and Recreation Grants  








                                                                       AB 988


                                                                      Page  2





          Program to increase the ability of underserved at-risk populations  
          to participate in outdoor recreation and educational experiences.   
          Specifically, this bill:


          1)States legislative findings and declarations regarding the  
            importance of park access, outdoor education, and outdoor  
            recreational experiences to the health and well-being of  
            California citizens and for continuing stewardship of our  
            natural resources, and regarding the public health problems  
            exacerbated by the lack of equitable access to these places and  
            experiences in many communities.  Makes further declarations  
            regarding the findings of the Parks Forward Commission, and the  
            outcomes and benefits of other state environmental education and  
            local park programs.
          2)States the intent of the Legislature to expand access to parks  
            and other outdoor educational and recreational opportunities in  
            underserved areas by convening and developing strategic  
            partnerships to facilitate, promote, and enhance park access as  
            well as outdoor educational and recreational experiences in  
            underserved communities.
          3)Requires DPR to establish an Outdoor Environmental Education and  
            Recreation Grants Program to increase the ability of underserved  
            and at-risk populations to participate in outdoor recreation and  
            educational experiences by awarding grants to public and  
            nonprofit organizations.


          4)Requires the director of DPR to develop criteria and procedures  
            to implement the program that give priority to underserved  
            populations, including both urban and rural areas and low-income  
            communities where participation in outdoor environmental  
            education and recreation programs has been limited.


          5)Authorizes the director of DPR to develop an advisory task  
            force, as specified, to assist in developing the program.










                                                                       AB 988


                                                                      Page  3





          6)Requires that funding priority be given to programs that  
            primarily serve students who are eligible for free or  
            reduced-price meals, foster youth, or pupils of limited English  
            proficiency, and have one of the following attributes:


               a)     Serve at-risk youth and underserved demographic  
                 groups.
               b)     Include public, private, and nonprofit partnerships.


               c)     Contribute to healthy lifestyles.


               d)     Maximize numbers of participants.


               e)     Commit in-kind resources.


               f)     Have a curriculum aligned to the science content  
                 standards for California public schools adopted by the  
                 State Board of Education.


               g)     Foster stewardship of the environment and includes  
                 curriculum developed under the statewide environmental  
                 education program.


               h)     Integrate instruction in science, technology,  
                 engineering and mathematics.


               i)     Include service learning and community outreach to  
                 build partnerships between participants and local  
                 communities.










                                                                       AB 988


                                                                      Page  4





          7)Provides that reverted and unencumbered funds from the  
            California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and  
            Coastal Protection Act of 2002 (Proposition 40) may be  
            appropriated by the Legislature for the purpose of this bill, if  
            consistent with the requirements of that Act, and that grants  
            awarded from those funds shall be awarded only to programs that  
            meet specified criteria.
          8)Authorizes the director of DPR to additionally accept private  
            donations made for support of the program, and to solicit and  
            accept private funding to help supplement the costs of the  
            program.  Specifies that such funding sources may include, but  
            are not limited to, foundations, corporate funding, crowd  
            funding resources, donation drives, and other sources.


          9)Requires that all moneys received for these purposes shall be  
            deposited in the California Youth Outdoor Education Account,  
            which this bill creates within the State Park and Recreation  
            Fund, and shall be continuously appropriated to DPR for purposes  
            of the program.


          10)Amends the State Urban Parks and Healthy Communities Act to  
            clarify that funds appropriated for purposes of that Act may  
            include programs in public park properties in the coastal zone.

          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Establishes DPR which is responsible for administering the state  
            park system.  DPR has also been directed under prior bond acts  
            to administer grant programs for local and regional parks and  
            related programs.  Authorizes DPR to provide spaces within the  
            state park system for schools to use for environmental  
            education.


          2)Establishes guidelines for DPR to use in granting funds for  
            programs that provide outdoor environmental education  








                                                                       AB 988


                                                                      Page  5





            experiences to low-income students on public properties.


          3)Establishes a statewide environmental education program, to be  
            administered by the Office of Education and Environment within  
            the Department of Resources, Recycling and Recovery  
            (CalRecycle), in cooperation with other agencies.  The program,  
            among other things, calls for development of a unified education  
            strategy on the environment for elementary and secondary  
            schools, including environmental education principles.


          4)Requires the Office of Education and Environment to develop a  
            model environmental education curriculum, to submit the  
            curriculum to the Instructional Quality Commission for review,  
            to make the curriculum available electronically, and to  
            coordinate with other state agencies to facilitate its use.


          5)Establishes the Environmental Education Account in the State  
            Treasury and authorizes CalRecycle to expend funds in the  
            Account.


          6)States legislative findings and declarations (contained in SB 96  
            (Leno), the Resources Budget trailer bill of 2013) that the  
            State's model Education and the Environment Curriculum is the  
            first of its kind in the nation to receive State Board of  
            Education approval.  Declares that CalRecycle should collaborate  
            across agencies and disciplines, including the California  
            Environmental Education Protection Agency (CalEPA), the  
            California Department of Education (CDE), and the Natural  
            Resources Agency, to achieve the goal of promoting environmental  
            literacy and use of the curriculum.


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:









                                                                       AB 988


                                                                      Page  6






          1)Substantial cost pressures, about $1 million annually, to fund  
            grants awarded by the DPR under the outdoor program.  (The  
            Outdoor Environmental Education and Recreation Fund created by  
            this bill to include reverted bond funds and private donations.)  

          2)Moderate one-time costs, in the range of $200,000 for DPR to  
            develop the program grant process (General Fund (GF), special or  
            private funds)


          3)Moderate ongoing costs, in the range of $400,000 annually, to  
            DPR to administer the outdoor program grant process, provide  
            technical assistance and perform site visits and audits (GF,  
            special or private funds.)


          COMMENTS:  This bill would establish a grant program to be  
          administered by DPR to provide funding for outdoor environmental  
          education and recreation programs operated by public entities or  
          nonprofit organizations. Priority would be given in awarding the  
          grants to programs serving at-risk youth and underserved  
          populations, including low-income students, foster youth, and  
          pupils with limited English proficiency, in addition to other  
          factors. Priority would also be given to programs using curricula  
          aligned with approved state educational standards.  The director  
          of DPR would be responsible for developing and administering the  
          program. 


          The author notes that "in many underserved communities outdoor  
          environmental education and recreation programs provide the only  
          exposure that children have to nature and the environment. Outdoor  
          environmental education provides students with memorable  
          real-world experiences which increase interest in science and  
          environmental stewardship.  Encouraging such interests may also  
          help students increase their interest and abilities in science,  
          technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects, which  
          will help ensure that California remains a leader in these fields  








                                                                       AB 988


                                                                      Page  7





          in the future."


          AB 1330 (Simitian), Chapter 633, Statutes of 2003, established the  
          Outdoor Environmental Education Program, administered by the CDE,  
          to support outdoor environmental programs serving primarily  
          at-risk youth.  The program involved participation in outdoor  
          environmental activities, including service learning and community  
          outreach components.  The program was in effect for one year,  
          sunset on January 1, 2005, and was repealed on January 1, 2006. 


          AB 1330 called for an independent study of the benefits of the  
          program.  The study was performed by the American Institutes for  
          Research and focused on 255 sixth-grade students from four  
          elementary schools who attended three outdoor education programs  
          in Tulare, Los Angeles, and San Diego Counties in 2004.  The study  
          found that, among other things, the science test scores of  
          children who participated in these programs were raised by 27%.   
          The children also exhibited measurable improvements in conflict  
          resolution and problem solving, self-esteem, and learning  
          motivation. Children who attended the outdoor science programs  
          showed statistically significant positive gains in all eight  
          constructs on which they were rated.  Also of note, 56% of the  
          participants reported that the outdoor school experience  
          represented the first time they had spent time in a natural  
          setting.  The study did note that due to the small sample size,  
          "findings cannot be generalized to all students attending outdoor  
          education programs in California, particularly because of the  
          range of programs that exist.  However, this research indicates a  
          large number of positive outcomes for at-risk children who attend  
          resident outdoor science schools certified by the California  
          Department of Education."  


          This bill furthers one of the priority recommendations of the  
          Parks Forward Commission, an independent commission appointed by  
          the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to conduct a  
          comprehensive review of the state park system.  The Commission  








                                                                       AB 988


                                                                      Page  8





          issued its final report and recommendations on January 30, 2015.   
          One of the top priority recommendations of the Commission was that  
          the state should improve park access to underserved communities,  
          with a particular emphasis on the needs of younger generations.   
          As the legislative findings in this bill indicate, the Commission  
          found, among other things, that improving access to parks, outdoor  
          experiences, and recreational opportunities, particularly for  
          youth in disadvantaged communities, will lead to more healthy  
          lifestyles, better educational outcomes, and improvements to the  
          overall well-being of California citizens, communities, and our  
          natural environment.


          This bill is similar to a number of past bills considered by the  
          Legislature, including AB 1603 (Stone) of 2014 which was held in  
          the Assembly Appropriations Committee.  One significant difference  
          between AB 1603 and this bill is that AB 1603 proposed to fund the  
          program from the GF, whereas this bill proposes that the program  
          be funded from, among other sources, reverted and unencumbered  
          Proposition 40 bond funds.  Other substantially similar past bills  
          on this issue include AB 2989 (Fuentes) of 2008, SB 207 (Padilla)  
          of 2007, and SB 1649 (Alarcon) of 2006, each of which proposed  
          funding from various sources and were held in the Senate  
          Appropriations Committee.  More recently, AB 2150 (Rendon) of 2014  
          proposed to create a new division of community initiatives and  
          park access within DPR, and called for the development of a  
          strategic action plan for improving park access and relevancy for  
          underserved populations.  It also included an emphasis on  
          development of partnerships to address park and recreational needs  
          of underserved youth and young adults, and to connect youth with  
          nature and the outdoors.  AB 2150 was vetoed by the Governor.  SB  
          204 (Pavley) of the currently legislative session, authorizes DPR  
          to accept donations from public or private sources to fund  
          programs to benefit youth, and to enter into cooperative  
          agreements with public or nonprofit organizations to provide  
          service and learning opportunities for youth.


          Supporters of this bill emphasize that this bill will fill a gap  








                                                                       AB 988


                                                                      Page  9





          in California's education programs by connecting underserved and  
          low-income students with nature.  They note that studies show  
          participating in outdoor education leads to increased learning  
          motivation and self-esteem, encouraging interest in science,  
          environmental stewardship, mathematics, and other STEM subjects.   
          Supporters also cite studies and reports documenting the many  
          benefits of outdoor education programs, including more positive  
          social relationships, learning conflict resolution, academic  
          success, improved mental health, and civic engagement. 


          There is no known opposition to this bill.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
                          Diane Colborn / W., P., & W. / (916) 319-2096  FN:  
          0000789