Amended in Senate June 25, 2015

Amended in Assembly April 13, 2015

California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 998


Introduced by Assembly Member Wagner

February 26, 2015


An act to amend Section 48a of the Civil Code, relating to libel.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 998, as amended, Wagner. Civil law: libel: damages.

Under existing law, in any action for damages for the publication of a libel in a newspaper or of a slander by a radio broadcast, the plaintiff is required to recover no more than special damages unless a correction is demanded and the correction is not published or broadcast. If a correction is demanded and the correction is not published or broadcast in a specified manner in the newspaper or on the broadcasting station, existing law authorizes the plaintiff to recover general, special, and exemplary damages provided certain requirements are met.

The bill would revise these provisions relating to libel to provide that the publication of a libel be in a dailybegin insert or weeklyend insert news publication, as defined. This bill would also make legislative findings regarding libel.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P1    1

SECTION 1.  

It is the intent of the Legislature to ensure that
2begin insert weekly and end insert online publications are afforded the same protection
P2    1under Section 48a of the Civil Code as is afforded to abegin delete printedend delete
2begin insert dailyend insert newspaper to the extent that thebegin delete online publication performsend delete
3begin insert weekly and online publications performend insert the same
4news-disseminating function as abegin delete printedend deletebegin insert dailyend insert newspaper. The
5Legislature finds and declares that the rulings in Burnett v. National
6Enquirer, Inc. (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 991 and Condit v. National
7Enquirer, Inc. (2002) 248 F.Supp.2d 945begin delete correctly state that the
8purposeend delete
begin insert do not fully recognize that the policyend insert of Section 48a of
9the Civil Codebegin delete isend delete to protect enterprises engaged in the immediate
10dissemination of news on matters of public concern, insofar as
11timebegin delete doesend deletebegin insert constraints doend insert not reasonably permit such enterprises
12to check sources for accuracy and stories for inadvertentbegin delete errors.end delete
13begin insert errors, should extend to online publications and weekly
14newspapers, which publish breaking news on deadlines
15indistinguishable from daily newspapers.end insert
It is not the intent of the
16Legislature that Section 48a of the Civil Code should apply to
17periodicals that publish atbegin delete weekly orend delete longerbegin insert than weeklyend insert intervals,
18nor is it the intent of the Legislature that Section 48a of the Civil
19Code should apply to casual postings on a social networking
20Internet Web site, chat room, electronic bulletin board, discussion
21group, online forum, or other related Internet Web site.

22

SEC. 2.  

Section 48a of the Civil Code is amended to read:

23

48a.  

1. In any action for damages for the publication of a libel
24in a dailybegin insert or weeklyend insert news publication, or of a slander by radio
25broadcast, plaintiff shall recover no more than special damages
26unless a correction be demanded and be not published or broadcast,
27as hereinafter provided. Plaintiff shall serve upon the publisher,
28at the place of publication or broadcaster at the place of broadcast,
29a written notice specifying the statements claimed to be libelous
30and demanding that the same be corrected. Said notice and demand
31must be served within 20 days after knowledge of the publication
32or broadcast of the statements claimed to be libelous.

332. If a correction be demanded within said period and be not
34published or broadcast in substantially as conspicuous a manner
35in said dailybegin insert or weeklyend insert news publication, or on said broadcasting
36station as were the statements claimed to be libelous, in a regular
37issue thereof published or broadcast within three weeks after such
38service, plaintiff, if he pleads and proves such notice, demand and
39failure to correct, and if his cause of action be maintained, may
40recover general, special and exemplary damages; provided that no
P3    1exemplary damages may be recovered unless the plaintiff shall
2prove that defendant made the publication or broadcast with actual
3malice and then only in the discretion of the court or jury, and
4actual malice shall not be inferred or presumed from the publication
5or broadcast.

63. A correction published or broadcast in substantially as
7conspicuous a manner in said dailybegin insert or weeklyend insert news publication,
8or on said broadcasting station as the statements claimed in the
9complaint to be libelous, prior to receipt of a demand therefor,
10shall be of the same force and effect as though such correction had
11been published or broadcast within three weeks after a demand
12therefor.

134. As used herein, the terms “general damages,” “special
14damages,” “exemplary damages” and “actual malice,” are defined
15as follows:

16(a) “General damages” are damages for loss of reputation,
17shame, mortification and hurt feelings.

18(b) “Special damages” are all damages which plaintiff alleges
19and proves that he has suffered in respect to his property, business,
20trade, profession or occupation, including such amounts of money
21as the plaintiff alleges and proves he has expended as a result of
22the alleged libel, and no other.

23(c) “Exemplary damages” are damages which may in the
24discretion of the court or jury be recovered in addition to general
25and special damages for the sake of example and by way of
26punishing a defendant who has made the publication or broadcast
27with actual malice.

28(d) “Actual malice” is that state of mind arising from hatred or
29ill will toward the plaintiff; provided, however, that such a state
30of mind occasioned by a good faith belief on the part of the
31defendant in the truth of the libelous publication or broadcast at
32the time it is published or broadcast shall not constitute actual
33malice.

345. For purposes of this section, a “dailybegin insert or weeklyend insert news
35publication” means a publication, either in print or electronic form,
36that contains news on matters of public concern and that publishes
37at leastbegin delete five daysend deletebegin insert onceend insert a week.



O

    97