BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1036 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 5, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY Mark Stone, Chair AB 1036 (Quirk) - As Amended April 9, 2015 PROPOSED CONSENT SUBJECT: NOTARIES PUBLIC: ACCEPTANCE OF IDENTIFICATION KEY ISSUE: should A NOTARY PUBLIC BE AUTHORIZED TO REASONABLY RELY ON THE PRESENTATION OF any form of INMATE IDENTIFICATION ISSUED BY a sheriff's department TO ESTABLISH THE IDENTITY OF THE INMATE WHO IS IN CUSTORY IN A LOCAL DETENTION FACILITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING NOTARY SERVICES AT THE FACILITY? SYNOPSIS This non-controversial bill seeks to authorize notaries public to reasonably rely on the presentation of any form of inmate identification issued by a sheriff's department, if the inmate is in custody in a local detention facility, to establish the identity of that inmate for the purpose of providing notary services. This bill is supported by notaries public, prisoner advocates, and sheriffs, who contend that this bill is needed to ensure that notary services are extended to inmates in county jails who may not otherwise have access to these important services because current law does not allow notaries to rely on AB 1036 Page 2 forms of identification issued by local sheriff's departments. Proponents contend that the need for notarial services in county jail facilities is real because county jail inmates, like other incarcerated persons, often need powers of attorney-for example, to vest a family member or friend with responsibility over property or bank account, or to authorize an informal caregiver to access services or benefits for the benefit of the inmate's child. The author states that his previous legislation, AB 625, Ch. 159 Stats. 2013, inadvertently failed to include any identification issued by a sheriff's department for county inmates when it updated then-existing law to allow CDCR-issued identification cards to be accepted for notarizing documents signed by inmates in state prisons. The author contends that the same rule should apply to inmates in county facilities, and accordingly this bill does just that. The bill has no known opposition. SUMMARY: Authorizes notaries public to reasonably rely on the presentation of any form of inmate identification issued by a sheriff's department, if the inmate is in custody in a local detention facility, to establish the identity of the inmate described in and executing a written instrument. EXISTING LAW: 1)Authorizes the proof or acknowledgment of a written instrument before specified officers of the state, including notaries public. (Civil Code Sections 1181-1183. All further references are to this code unless otherwise stated.) 2)Provides that acknowledgement of a written instrument shall not be taken unless the officer taking it has satisfactory evidence that the person making the acknowledgement is the individual who is described in and who executed the instrument. (Section 1185(a).) AB 1036 Page 3 3)Defines "satisfactory evidence" to mean the absence of information, evidence, or other circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the person making the acknowledgment is not the individual he or she claims to be, and reasonable reliance on the presentation to the officer of one of the following documents, if it is current or has been issued within five years: a) An identification card or driver's license issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles. b) A passport issued by the U.S. Department of State. c) An inmate identification card issued by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, if the inmate is in custody in prison. (Section 1185(b)(3).) 4)In addition to the items listed above, authorizes reasonable reliance on the presentation of the following forms of identification as long as they are current or issued within five years, contain a photograph, description and signature of the person named on it, and bear a serial or other identifying number: a) A passport issued by a foreign government. b) A driver's license issued by a state other than California or by a Canadian or Mexican public agency authorized to issue driver's licenses. c) An identification card issued by a state other than California. d) An identification card issued by any branch of the Armed Forces of the United States. e) An employee identification card issued by an agency or office of the State of California, or by an agency or office of a city, county, or city and county in this state. (Section 1185(b)(4).) AB 1036 Page 4 FISCAL EFFECT: As currently in print this bill is keyed non-fiscal. COMMENTS: This non-controversial bill seeks to authorize notaries public to reasonably rely on the presentation of any form of inmate identification issued by a sheriff's department, if the inmate is in custody in a local detention facility, to establish the identity of the inmate for the purpose of providing notary services. According to the author, this bill is needed to ensure that notary services are extended to inmates in county jails, who may not otherwise have access to those services because current law does not allow notaries to rely on forms of identification issued by local sheriff's departments. Author's statement. In support of the bill, the author states: Access to a notary is an inmate's legal right, and inmates often need access to notaries for services that include establishing temporary custody of children, power of attorney for financial and health care matters, and giving authority to a trusted adult to bring their children to the jail for a visit. In 2013, AB 625 (Quirk) was signed by Governor Brown to allow notaries to use inmate IDs issued by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) as a presumptively valid form of identification for notary services. AB 625, however, inadvertently excluded IDs issued by a sheriff's department for inmates in county jails. This bill would simply add county jail inmate identification to the list of valid forms of ID accepted by notaries for notary services. AB 1036 Page 5 Examples of need for notarial services among inmate populations. This bill is supported by notaries, prisoner advocates, and sheriffs, who all agree that inmates in county jails need services that notaries cannot legally perform because these inmates cannot produce identification that notaries are authorized to accept as proof of identification under current law. According to proponents, inmates must surrender possession of their identification when they are incarcerated in local jails and given other forms of identification that are not acceptable for the purpose of proving identity under Section 1185. The National Notary Association states: Over the years our association has regularly fielded complaints from members who travel to county facilities to perform notarizations, only to find the inmate does not carry the proper identification to satisfy the legal requirement for satisfactory evidence of identity. Without proper ID, notaries must refuse to perform the notarization. This has resulted in the denial of notarial services to inmates needing powers of attorney, family visitation forms and other important documents notarized. According to the Sheriff's Office of the City and County of San Francisco, there are tens of thousands of people incarcerated in California county jails today-a number that has risen in recent years because of prison realignment. Even while they are jail, these inmates are parents and heads of households who still need to make decisions concerning the care and welfare of their children, or financial matters relating to housing or medical care. Proponents note that proof of an inmate's assent is legally required, for example, when enrolling a child in school or when attempting to travel outside the country with a child. In such cases, notarial services, if available, can be used by an inmate to formally acknowledge such decisions or allow an inmate to designate a trusted agent to make these decisions. AB 1036 Page 6 Legal Services for Prisoners with Children (LSPC) also notes that county jail inmates, like other incarcerated persons, often need powers of attorney to vest a family member or friend with responsibility over property, checks, and bank accounts, or in other cases, a power of attorney for child custody in order to authorize an informal caregiver to access services or benefits for the inmate's child. Authorization of county jail identification for notarial purposes. In order to facilitate access to notarial services to inmates of county jail facilities, this bill would authorize forms of inmate identification issued by county sheriffs to meet the legal requirement for evidence of identity for notarized documents. The author states that his previous legislation, AB 625 (Ch. 159 Stats. 2013), inadvertently failed to include identification issued by a sheriff's department for county inmates when it updated then-existing law to allow CDCR-issued identification cards to be accepted for notarizing documents signed by state prisoners. The author contends that the same rule for state prisoners should apply to inmates in county facilities, as both groups of people are similarly situated with respect to their need for notarial services and lack of access to other forms of government-issued identification while they are incarcerated. Proponents note that, like their CDCR counterparts at the state level, county sheriffs take significant measures to ensure accuracy in determining the identity of inmates, including routine fingerprinting, as well as measures to deter the theft of ID cards. LSPC contends that, in their experience, there is no reason to distrust the accuracy of county jail-issued identification cards. Finally, the author notes that by authorizing existing county jail-issued forms of identification, this bill will result in AB 1036 Page 7 quicker access to notarial services for inmates because it renders unnecessary any need for county sheriffs to develop an additional identification card specifically for obtaining notarial services. Previous related legislation. AB 625 (Quirk), Ch. 159, Stats. 2013, authorized CDCR-issued prisoner identification cards to be accepted by notaries for providing notarial services. AB 442 (Arambula) of 2009 would have authorized the Matricula Consular, the consular identification card issued by the Mexican government, to be accepted by notaries, but that bill was vetoed. AB 2452 (Davis), Ch. 67, Stats. 2008, added specified governmental employee identification cards as an allowable form of identification for obtaining notarial services. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) California Association of Licensed Investigators Legal Services for Prisoners with Children AB 1036 Page 8 National Notary Association Office of the Sheriff, City and County of San Francisco Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by:Anthony Lew / JUD. / (916) 319-2334