BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson, Chair 2015-2016 Regular Session AB 1036 (Quirk) Version: April 9, 2015 Hearing Date: June 9, 2015 Fiscal: No Urgency: No TMW SUBJECT Notaries public: acceptance of identification DESCRIPTION This bill would authorize a notary public to rely on any inmate identification issued by a sheriff's department to prove the identity of an individual in custody in a local detention facility. BACKGROUND A notary public is a public officer appointed and commissioned by the Secretary of State to serve the public in non-contentious matters generally concerning estates, deeds, powers-of-attorney, foreign and international business, and other written instruments. Occasionally, an individual who is party to a more sensitive formal agreement, such as a child custody agreement, a confidential marriage license, or an advance healthcare directive, must have the agreement notarized before it can enter into force. A notary's main functions are to take acknowledgements of various written instruments, administer oaths and affirmations, take depositions and affidavits, certify copies of powers of attorney under the Probate Code, demand acceptance and payment of foreign and inland bills of exchange or promissory notes, and to protest nonpayment and nonacceptance of bills and notes. (Gov. Code Sec. 8205.) A certificate of acknowledgment is the form most frequently completed by a notary public. In the certificate of acknowledgment, the notary public certifies: 1) that the signer AB 1036 (Quirk) Page 2 of ? personally appeared before the notary public on the date indicated in the county indicated; 2) the identity of the signer; and 3) that the signer acknowledged executing the document. Under current law, the identity of the signer of an acknowledgment may be established by the notary public's reasonable reliance on any one of a number of documents. (Civ. Code Sec. 1185.) Certain government documents that are current or have been issued within five years, such as a California driver's license or identification (ID) card, or a U.S. passport, provide sufficient proof of identity without having to meet separately specified criteria. Other documents, including a foreign passport, a government employee ID card, and a driver's license issued by another state or a Canadian or Mexican public agency authorized to issue driver's licenses, must meet certain threshold criteria before a notary can reasonably rely on them to establish identity. Documents within this latter category must contain a photograph, description of the person, signature of the person, and an identifying number, in order to constitute a valid proof of identity for obtaining notarization of an instrument. Prior to 2014, incarcerated individuals faced challenges in performing a number of tasks, including getting needed authorizations to permit a minor child (such as a son or daughter) to visit them while in prison, as a result of a notary public's inability to accept a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) ID card as proof of identity. As CDCR requires minor children visiting a prison inmate to be accompanied by someone other than his/her parent or legal guardian, in addition to the certified copy of the minor children's birth certificate, the adult must also bring a notarized written consent authorization form signed by the minor children's parent or legal guardian expressly giving permission for the minor children to visit a prisoner. Consequently, an inmate whose child was living with a friend or relative during a period of incarceration was prevented from seeing that child until he or she was able to secure proper ID to present to a notary. To address this problem, AB 625 (Quirk, Chapter 159, Statutes of 2013) authorized the notary public to rely on CDCR-issued ID cards to be accepted for notarizing documents signed by state prisoners. Inmates in local county jails also need notarial services for AB 1036 (Quirk) Page 3 of ? the same reasons as state prisoners. Accordingly, this bill would authorize a notary public to rely on ID issued by a sheriff's department for county inmates when notarizing documents signed by local county jail inmates. CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW Existing law authorizes the proof or acknowledgment of written instruments before specified officers of the state, including notaries public. (Civ. Code Secs. 1180-1183.) Existing law provides that the acknowledgment of an instrument may not be taken unless the officer (notary public) taking it has satisfactory evidence that the person making the acknowledgment is the individual who is described in and who executed the instrument. (Civ. Code Sec. 1185(a).) Existing law provides that "satisfactory evidence" means the absence of any information, evidence, or other circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the person making the acknowledgment is not the individual he or she claims to be plus the use of any one of various specified ways of establishing the proper identity of the person making the acknowledgment (such as the oath or affirmation of a credible witness or the presentation of a specified identifying document). (Civ. Code Sec. 1185(b).) Existing law provides that the officer may reasonably rely on the presentation of any one of the following, provided that the document is current or has been issued within five years: an identification card or driver's license issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles; a passport issued by the Department of State of the United States; or an inmate identification card issued by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, if the inmate is in custody in prison. (Civ. Code Sec. 1185(b)(3).) Existing law provides that the officer may reasonably rely on the presentation of any one of the following, provided that the document is current or has been issued within five years and contains a photograph and description of the person named on it, is signed by the person, and bears a serial or other identifying number, and, in the event that the document is a passport, has been stamped by the United States Citizenship and Immigration AB 1036 (Quirk) Page 4 of ? Services of the Department of Homeland Security: a passport issued by a foreign government; a driver's license issued by a state other than California or by a Canadian or Mexican public agency authorized to issue driver's licenses; an ID card issued by a state other than California; an ID card issued by any branch of the Armed Forces of the United States; or an employee ID card issued by an agency or office of the State of California, or by an agency or office of a city, county, or city and county in this state. This bill would add any form of inmate identification issued by a sheriff's department to the list of proper identifications on which an officer may reasonably rely, provided that the inmate seeking to establish identity with the card is in custody in a local detention facility. COMMENT 1. Stated need for the bill The author writes: Identification cards (IDs) or driver licenses issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles, passports issued by the US Department of State[,] and inmate identification cards issued by the [California] Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) for inmates in prison are the only forms of documents presumptively valid as identification for use by notaries. Notaries can accept other forms of IDs only IF the following elements are met: the ID was issued within the last 5 years, it contains a picture and description of the person named in it, it is signed by that person and has some identifying number. Because county jails fail to meet the above requirements, inmates seeking notary services should be issued an additional form of ID, however, none are. Access to a notary is an inmate's legal right, and inmates often need access to notaries for services that include establishing temporary custody of children, power of attorney for financial and health care matters, and giving authority to a trusted adult to bring their children to the jail for a visit. AB 1036 (Quirk) Page 5 of ? AB 1036 adds county jail inmate IDs to the list of valid forms of ID accepted by notaries for notary services. As such, an additional ID would be unnecessary and would not delay access to service. 2. Increased need for county jail inmate notary services As discussed above, AB 625 (Quirk, Chapter 159, Statutes of 2013) authorized notary publics to rely on CDCR-issued IDs in order to establish the identity of a person executing a document to be notarized. Around the same time, the United States Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Plata (2011) 131 S. Ct. 1910 required California to significantly reduce its prison population in order to remedy the lack of care for prison inmates with serious medical and psychological conditions. One month before the court's decision, AB 109 (Committee on Budget, Chapter 15, Statutes of 2011) enacted the Public Safety Realignment Act and, among other things, required the transfer of large numbers of convicted felons from the state prison and parole system to the state's 58 county jails. According to the California Research Bureau, approximately 97,000 California children have a parent in county jail. The Office of the Sheriff, City and County of San Francisco, in support, states that: There are tens of thousands of men and women incarcerated in California's county jails today. Many of these men and women are parents and breadwinners for their family who need to make important decisions during the time they are away from home. These decisions concern the care and welfare of their children, financial matters surrounding family housing and maintenance, and immigration issues. In many instances proof of an incarcerated person's asset to a decision is legally required before an important action can be taken, as is the case when enrolling a child in school or when attempting to travel outside of the country with a child. If available, notarial services can be used by a county jail inmate to formally acknowledge these important decisions. Notarial services can also operate to allow an inmate to designate a trusted agent to make these important decisions in their absence. This crucial bridge can operate to save a prisoner's housing or to authorize a child's medical care. Unfortunately, however, current California law precludes many AB 1036 (Quirk) Page 6 of ? of these men and women from being able to access these vital services. State prison inmates are able to use their CDCR-issued ID cards when using notary public services. Notably, if those inmates are transferred to a local county jail, they lose the ability to utilize notary public services because there is no way for these inmates to prove their identity. This bill seeks to extend notary services access of state prison inmates to county jail inmates by authorizing a notary public to use a sheriff-issued ID to verify an inmate's identity while the inmate is in custody. 3. Use of IDs in California county jails Inmate identification cards are critical to the internal operations of a county jail. When an individual is received by a county jail, he or she is issued an inmate ID and are required to wear it on their outer garment at all times. Inmate ID cards and the information displayed on them are used in the delivery of several key jail services, including the administration of medication at a jail dispensary, and the distribution of property such as jail-issued clothing. Inmates are not permitted to bring a second form of identification into a correctional facility. The National Notary Association, in support, states that "[o]ver the years our association has regularly fielded complaints from members who travel to county facilities to perform notarizations, only to find the inmate does not carry the proper identification to satisfy the legal requirement for satisfactory evidence of identity. Without proper ID, notaries must refuse to perform the notarization. This has resulted in the denial of notarial services to inmates needing powers of attorney, family visitation forms, and other important documents notarized." The California Association of Licensed Investigators, Inc., in support, argues that "[s]heriff's departments take significant measures to ensure accuracy in determining the identity of inmates, and there are mechanisms that Sheriffs have established to deter the theft of IDs. As such, an additional ID is unnecessary and delays access to service. This bill will remove an unnecessary step and streamline the process by which inmates seek important notary services." Further, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children, also in support, asserts that "[t]here AB 1036 (Quirk) Page 7 of ? is no reason to distrust the accuracy of a jail-issued identification card. Jails routinely take fingerprints to [ensure] the identities of the people they incarcerate." 4. Impact of notarization ID requirements on incarcerated parents and the children of incarcerated parents According to the California Research Bureau, approximately 97,000 California children have a parent in county jail. The author notes that "[f]athers are more likely to have a partner to care for their children when incarcerated. Unfortunately, mothers are less likely to have a partner on the outside who can care and raise their child once in jail. The incarceration of a parent can be traumatic and life altering. Uninterrupted access to guardianship, school and medical treatment is beneficial in helping such children retain a sense of 'normality' in their lives. Once a parent is incarcerated, these arrangements can be made via the services of a notary." The Office of the District Attorney, City and County of San Francisco, in support, further asserts that "[o]ne way we can help ensure successful reentry [of jail inmates into society] is to remove barriers that limit an inmate's ability to manage [his or her] personal affairs on the outside. This can help them maintain a supportive environment to return to once they have completed their term of imprisonment. This bill ensures inmates have a greater opportunity to develop and maintain normalcy for themselves and their children, which can support their reentry to the community and improve recidivism rates. Children whose parents have been incarcerated often "experienc[e] the trauma of sudden separation from their sole caregiver, and most are vulnerable to feelings of fear, anxiety, anger, sadness, depression and guilt." (California Research Bureau, Children of Incarcerated Parents (Mar. 2000)[as of May 29, 2015] p. 1.) This trauma can result in "negative behavioral manifestations" including "sadness, withdrawal, low self-esteem, decline in school performance, truancy, and use of drugs or alcohol and aggression." (Id., p. 4.) As with the trauma experienced by incarcerated mothers, the negative impacts on children resulting from a parent's incarceration not only damages the individual, but exacts a substantial public cost on families, communities, and civic institutions. AB 1036 (Quirk) Page 8 of ? Incarceration makes it difficult for parents to maintain contact with their children, and research indicates that "[m]ore than half of incarcerated mothers do not receive any visits from their children while they are in prison." (Children of Incarcerated Parents, p. 5.) "The single most significant reason for lack of contact is the children's distance from their mothers' prisons, many of which are located far from major population centers." (Id.) However, overly burdensome inmate ID requirements can also preclude these critical visits between mothers and their children. Although visitation requirements may vary from county to county, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department rules for visitation by a minor child require the written notarized consent of a parent or legal guardian to be presented for each visit, and the minor child must be accompanied by a responsible adult who is also approved to visit. Thus, an inmate whose child is living with a friend or relative during a period of incarceration may be precluded from seeing that child until such a time that he or she secures proper identification to present to a notary. This bill would significantly ease the ability of children to visit incarcerated parents by permitting inmates to obtain needed notarizations without having to wait for the county jail to issue a second inmate ID, which is the current practice. In so doing, it would help parents and children maintain the familial bonds that are so critical to the well-being of family members both inside and outside of prison. 5. Application only to inmates "in custody" This bill would only permit inmates "in custody in a local detention facility" to use their inmate ID cards to establish their identity in order to obtain notary services. In most instances, the changes to existing law made under this bill would only apply to inmates confined to a local county jail, and as a result the provisions of this bill would likely apply only to those notaries who provide services at these facilities. Because the bill's language limits its efficacy to inmates "in custody in a local detention facility," and because local county sheriff departments do not allow inmates to retain inmate ID cards once released from prison, this bill is unlikely to have any significant impact on the larger practice of California's notaries public. AB 1036 (Quirk) Page 9 of ? Support : California Association of Licensed Investigators; Legal Services for Prisoners with Children; National Notary Association; Office of the District Attorney, City and County of San Francisco; Office of the Public Defender, City and County of San Francisco; Office of the Sheriff, City and County of San Francisco Opposition : None Known HISTORY Source : Author Related Pending Legislation : None Known Prior Legislation : AB 625 (Quirk, Chapter 159, Statutes of 2013) See Background; Comment 2. AB 109 (Committee on Budget, Chapter 15, Statutes of 2011) See Comment 2. AB 442 (Arambula, 2009) would have amended Civil Code Section 1185 to add a matrícula consular, issued through a consulate office of the Mexican Government, as an allowable form of identification (ID) to prove the identity of an individual who executes a written instrument. AB 442 was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger because the Civil Code already provided for more secure forms of ID than the matrícula consular - including Mexican driver's licenses and passports - to identify Mexican nationals, and California notaries should not be required to accept a form of ID that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Department of Justice continue to consider untrustworthy. SB 461 (Correa, 2009) would have amended Civil Code Section 1185 to add a matrícula consular, issued through a consulate office of the Mexican Government, as an allowable form of identification to prove the identity of an individual who executes a written instrument. SB 461 died in the Senate Judiciary Committee. AB 2452 (Davis, Chapter 67, Statutes of 2008) added specified government employee ID cards as an allowable form of ID to prove the identity of an individual who executes a written instrument AB 1036 (Quirk) Page 10 of ? before a notary public. AB 2452 also deleted a provision allowing a witness to an individual's ID who is personally known to the notary to serve as evidence for an acknowledgment by a notary public. AB 886 (Runner, Chapter 399, Statutes of 2007) requires, among other things, notaries public to determine by satisfactory evidence only that a person acknowledging an instrument is the individual who is described in and who signed the instrument, and to certify the document under penalty of perjury. AB 886 also requires notaries to obtain the thumbprint of a party signing a document where the document to be notarized is a deed, quitclaim deed, deed of trust affecting real property, or a power of attorney. AB 2062 (Nakano, Chapter 539, Statutes of 2004) requires a notary public to use a jurat (an official declaration similar to an affidavit) form to certify the identity of persons signing documents. AB 1090 (Tucker, Chapter 1044, Statutes of 1993), among other things, revised the criteria for determining whether an individual has presented satisfactory evidence of identity for a notary public to take an acknowledgment of an instrument. AB 2420 (McClintock, Chapter 307, Statutes of 1987) included within the documents that established "satisfactory evidence" for notarization an inmate ID card issued by the Department of Corrections, if the inmate is in custody. Prior Vote : Assembly Floor (Ayes 79, Noes 0) Assembly Judiciary Committee (Ayes 10, Noes 0) **************