BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      AB 1042


                                                                      Page  1





          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING


          AB  
          1042 (Cooper)


          As Amended  May 18, 2015


          Majority vote


           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Committee       |Votes |Ayes                |Noes                  |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------|
          |Business &      |14-0  |Bonilla, Jones,     |                      |
          |Professions     |      |Baker, Bloom,       |                      |
          |                |      |Burke, Chang, Dodd, |                      |
          |                |      |Eggman, Gatto,      |                      |
          |                |      |Holden, Mullin,     |                      |
          |                |      |Ting, Wilk, Wood    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
          |                |      |                    |                      |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          SUMMARY:  Expands the definition of a proprietary private security  
          officer (PPSO) to include a person who may wear distinct clothing  
          identifying himself or herself as "security," or who may interact  
          with the public, as specified.  Specifically, this bill: 



          1)Defines a proprietary security guard as someone who meets either  
            of the following criteria: 









                                                                      AB 1042


                                                                      Page  2







             a)   He or she is required to wear a distinctive uniform or  
               marked shirt or jacket clearly identifying the individual as  
               a security officer; or,  



             b)   He or she is likely to interact with the public while  
               providing security services, which may include, but not be  
               limited to, acting to prevent unapproved or unlawful entry,  
               directing persons causing a disturbance to leave the  
               facility, ensuring that persons removing property from the  
               facility are acting within appropriate policy requirements,  
               observing and reporting incidents or suspicious activity to  
               management and to public safety authorities as appropriate,  
               and responding to or reporting incidents of fire, medical  
               emergency, hazardous materials, and other incidents or  
               conditions following procedures established by the employer.



          FISCAL EFFECT:  None.  This bill is keyed non-fiscal by the  
          Legislative Counsel. 

          COMMENTS:

          Purpose.  This bill is sponsored by the California Association of  
          Licensed Security Agencies, Guards and Associates.  According to  
          the author, "AB 1042 updates the definition of a Proprietary  
          Private Security Officer to ensure individuals providing security  
          services are subject to a background check and receive appropriate  
          training." 

          Background.  There are two different categories of security guards  
          regulated by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services  
          (BSIS), within the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA):  1) those  
          who work in-house for a specific employer, PPSOs, and 2) those who  
          are employed by a contract security firm to provide security  








                                                                      AB 1042


                                                                      Page  3





          services for a third party, security guards.  

          A security guard protects persons or property and prevents theft  
          on premised owned or controlled by the customer of the private  
          patrol operator, the contract security firm, or by the guard's  
          employer or in the company of persons being protected.  Security  
          guards must be at least 18 years old, undergo a criminal history  
          background check through the California Department of Justice  
          (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and complete  
          a 40-hour course of required training.  The training and exam may  
          be administered by any private patrol operator or by a certified  
          training facility.  

          A PPSO, on the other hand, is someone who is unarmed, employed  
          only by a single employer, and whose primary duty is to provide  
          security services for his or her employer, a proprietary private  
          security employer (PPSE).  A PPSO must also meet the following  
          criteria:  1) he or she must wear a distinctive uniform clearly  
          identifying the individual as a security officer, and 2) he or she  
          must be likely to interact with the public while performing his or  
          her duties.  Similar to security guards, applicants for PPSO  
          registration must be at least 18 years old and undergo a criminal  
          history background check through the DOJ and the FBI.  Once  
          registered, PPSOs are required to carry a valid and current PPSO  
          registration card, or a hard copy printout of the BSIS's approval.  
           PPSOs are also required to complete 16 hours of training in  
          security officer skills within six months from the date upon which  
          registration is issued, or within six months of his or her  
          employment with a PPSE.  A PPSE is required to annually provide  
          each employee with specifically dedicated review or practice of  
          security officer skills, as specified, and to maintain records  
          verifying completion of the review or practice training, and  
          records of employment for PPSOs.  PPSEs are prohibited from  
          subletting PPSOs to another person, business, or entity. 

          Persons exempt from registration requirements as a PPSO or a PPSE  
          include an officer or employee of the United States, or of this  
          state or a political subdivision of the state; a charitable  
          philanthropic nonprofit society or association incorporated under  








                                                                      AB 1042


                                                                      Page  4





          the laws of the state; patrol special police officers; and a peace  
          officer or retired peace officer, as specified.

          According to the 2014 BSIS Sunset Review Report, in fiscal year  
          2013-14, there were roughly 594 PPSEs, and 6,201 PPSOs.  

          Need for the Bill.  According to the author, the current  
          definition of PPSO is too narrow and should include persons not  
          wearing a uniform, but who act primarily in a security capacity,  
          such as a bouncer at a bar or restaurant.  For example, a San  
          Diego affiliate of National Broadcast Company (NBC) News reported  
          on February 10, 2015, that there was an "underground industry" of  
          unlicensed, untrained security guards and bouncers in San Diego  
          County, and that many of the security officers were not licensed  
          properly.  According to a DCA spokesman quoted in the story, "?  
          for proprietary security guards, the ones that work for  
          restaurants and bars and those sorts of things, unlicensed  
          activity can be a vexing problem because not every bar that  
          springs up is aware of the licensing requirement? It's not so much  
          underground as they are unaware."  

          The DCA spokesman also noted that a security officer only needs to  
          be licensed if the employee is wearing clothing that identified  
          him or her as security; if the person is not wearing a uniform,  
          but performing the same duties, no license is required.  As a  
          result, those individuals would not be required to register with  
          the BSIS, have a background check, or meet any training  
          requirements. 


          Analysis Prepared by:                                               
          Eunie Linden / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301  FN: 0000501















                                                                      AB 1042


                                                                      Page  5