AB 1051,
as amended, Maienschein. Denti-Calbegin delete program.end deletebegin insert program: reimbursement rates.end insert
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law provides for a schedule of benefits provided under the Medi-Cal program, which includes certain dental services that are referred to as Denti-Cal.
This bill wouldbegin delete appropriate $200,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Health Care Services for the Denti-Cal program. The bill wouldend delete require thebegin delete departmentend deletebegin insert
State Department of Health Care Servicesend insert tobegin delete allocate these funds to, among other things, increase funding for preventative care and case management services, as appropriate, to achieve
significant long-term cost savings, increased provider participation, and increased beneficiary utilization under the Denti-Cal program.end deletebegin insert increase Denti-Cal provider reimbursement rates for the 15 most common prevention, treatment, and oral evaluation services to the regional average commercial rates, effective January 1, 2017.end insert
Vote: begin delete2⁄3 end deletebegin insertmajorityend insert.
Appropriation: begin deleteyes end deletebegin insertnoend insert.
Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) California’s Medicaid dental program, Denti-Cal, is charged
4with providing an adequate level of dental coverage to 13 million
5low-income Californians, including five million children.
6(b) Dental care, particularly preventative care, can have
7significant long-term impacts. Tooth decay and disease are
8associated with pregnancy risks, diabetes, and respiratory and heart
9disease. Additionally, a lack of access to dental care among
10children can result in missed school days, and ultimately poorer
11academic performance.
12(c) Denti-Cal, as currently implemented and funded, is a failure.
13Just 37.8 percent of California’s five million Denti-Cal-eligible
14children saw a dentist in the 2014 calendar year.
15(d) The Milton Marks “Little Hoover” Commission on California
16State Government Organization and Efficiency and the California
17State Auditor both note these low utilization rates, which stem
18from a lack of providers and an uneven distribution of those
19providers that do participate in the Denti-Cal program. Five
20counties have no providers, and 14 counties only have providers
21that are not accepting new patients.
P3 1(e) The lack of providers is partly a result of low reimbursement
2rates, which are typically one-third to one-half of the national
3average
for common procedures.
(a) begin deleteThe sum of two hundred million dollars begin insertIt is the end insertintent of the Legislature
5($200,000,000) is hereby appropriated from the General Fund to
6the State Department of Health Care Services for the Denti-Cal
7program. The end deletebegin delete isend delete to attract and
8retain morebegin insert Denti-Calend insert providers, with an emphasis on underserved
9areas, and to increase utilization of
the program.
10(b) begin deleteThe end deletebegin insertEffective January 1, 2017, the end insertState Department of
11Health Care Services shallbegin delete allocate the funds appropriated in
12subdivision (a), as appropriate, to accomplish both of the following:end delete
13begin delete(1)end deletebegin delete end deletebegin deleteIncreaseend deletebegin insert increase Denti-Cal providerend insert
reimbursement rates
14for the 15 most common prevention, treatment, and oral evaluation
15services to thebegin delete Medicaid national average.end deletebegin insert
regional average
16commercial rates.end insert
17(2) Increase funding for preventative care and case management
18services, as appropriate, to achieve significant long-term cost
19savings, increased provider participation, and increased beneficiary
20utilization under the program.
21(c) Any funds remaining after the allocation specified in
22subdivision (b) shall be allocated to other uses that further the
23intent of the Legislature, as described in subdivision (a), including,
24but not limited to, increasing additional reimbursement rates to
25the national average.
O
94