BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1075


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 20, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          1075 (Alejo) - As Amended May 13, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Environmental Safety and Toxic |Vote:|5 - 2        |
          |Committee:   |Materials                      |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:


          This bill establishes standards for what constitutes a repeat  
          serious hazardous waste facility violation and specifies the  
          enforcement action to be taken by the Department of Toxic  
          Substances Control (DTSC).  Specifically, this bill:  








                                                                    AB 1075


                                                                    Page  2







          1)Requires DTSC to consider three or more violations or  
            noncompliance for which a facility operator  has been found  
            liable or has been convicted within a five-year period as a  
            compelling cause to deny, suspend, or revoke operating  
            permits.  Exempts third violations or noncompliances if DTSC  
            finds extraordinary circumstances exist, including if the  
            revocation would endanger public health or safety or the  
            environment.


          2)Defines a serious violation as including any of the following:

               a)     Fire, explosion, or an uncontrolled chemical  
                 reaction;
               b)     Serious or acute injury or illness;
               c)     Violation of any order issued by DTSC to the  
                 applicant or holder of the permit; or
               d)     Federal or state felony conviction for violations of  
                 hazardous waste laws.





          3)Authorizes DTSC to temporarily suspend a hazardous waste  
            facility if DTSC determines that conditions may present an  
            imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health or  
            safety or the environment as specified.

          4)Imposes an additional civil penalty of not less than $5,000,  
            or more than $50,000, for each day of a serious hazardous  
            waste violation, if the person has been found liable for, or  
            been convicted of, 2 or more previous violations within any  
            consecutive 60 months.
          










                                                                    AB 1075


                                                                    Page  3





          FISCAL EFFECT:



          1)Minor, if any state costs associated with increased legal work  
            if regulated entities choose not to settle potential  
            violations captured under the bill and instead require DTSC to  
            file a claim in court (Hazardous Waste Control Account).  





          2)Potential unknown cost savings resulting from increased  
            compliance in order to avoid the additional penalties and  
            repeat violations (Hazardous Waste Control Account).


           




          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose.  According to the author, this bill establishes a  
            bright regulatory line for permit denial and revocation.  This  
            bill strengthens the authority of DTSC by specifying that  
            three or more serious violations during a five-year period  
            result in a clear obligation to revoke a hazardous waste  
            facility permit.  



          2)Background.  Existing federal law requires owners and  
            operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of  
            hazardous waste to obtain an operating permit pursuant to the  
            Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).








                                                                    AB 1075


                                                                    Page  4





            
            The California Hazardous Waste Control Act requires facilities  
            handling hazardous waste to obtain a permit from DTSC.  

            DTSC is responsible for the review and issuance of RCRA and  
            non-RCRA hazardous waste permits.  There are currently 118  
            DTSC-permitted hazardous waste facilities in California  
            including: 44 storage sites; 43 treatment facilities; three  
            disposal sites; and 28 post-closure sites.
            


            


          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Galehouse / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081