BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1077| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 1077 Author: Holden (D) Amended: 6/22/15 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE GOVERNANCE & FIN. COMMITTEE: 6-0, 6/17/15 AYES: Hertzberg, Nguyen, Beall, Hernandez, Moorlach, Pavley NO VOTE RECORDED: Lara ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-0, 5/22/15 - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Mutual water companies: open meetings SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill amends the Mutual Water Company Open Meetings Act to allow mutual water companies to use teleconferencing as a means to allow eligible persons to access board meetings. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Specifies that any corporation organized for or engaged in the business of selling, distributing, supplying, or delivering water for irrigation purposes or for domestic use must be known as a mutual water company. 2)Defines a "public water system" to mean a system for the AB 1077 Page 2 provision of water for human consumption through pipes or other constructed conveyances that has 15 or more service connections or regularly serves at least 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year. 3)Establishes, pursuant to the Mutual Water Companies Open Meetings Act, increased transparency requirements for mutual water companies that operate a public water system, including the following provisions: a) Defines "eligible person" to mean any of the following: i) A shareholder or member of the mutual water company; ii) A commercial or residential renter to which the company provides drinking water; iii) An elected official of a city or county who represents people who receive drinking water directly from the company; iv) Any other person deemed eligible by the company's articles or bylaws. b) Allows an eligible person, upon 24 hours advance written notice, to attend meetings in person; c) Requires an eligible person-without giving 24 hours' notice to the board-to be able to attend a meeting that is held via teleconference, and requires the notice for the meeting to specify where an eligible person may hear the teleconference meeting; d) Requires eligible persons to be notified at least four days prior to a meeting; e) Requires the board to permit any eligible person to speak at any meeting, within reasonable time limits; f) Provides, with limited exceptions, that a mutual water company Board may not discuss or take action on any item at a meeting unless the item was placed on the agenda included in the meeting notice that was posted and distributed AB 1077 Page 3 pursuant to the Act; g) Allows the board to meet in executive session, during a regular meeting or exclusively in executive session, for certain purposes. 4)Requires, pursuant to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act), that all meetings of a legislative body, as defined, of a local agency be open and public and all persons permitted to attend, unless a closed session is authorized. 5)Defines, for purposes of the Brown Act, local agency to mean a county, city, whether general law or chartered, city and county, town, school district, municipal corporation, district, political subdivision, or any board, commission or agency thereof, or other local public agency. This bill: 1)Revises portions of the Mutual Water Company Open Meetings Act to improve the access of eligible people to mutual water company board meetings in the following ways: a) Specifically requires a mutual water company's board to allow an eligible person to attend a meeting in person if the person has given at least 24 hours' notice of their intent to personally attend the meeting. b) Allows the board to use teleconferencing to provide any eligible person access to a meeting who has been denied access because either: i) The eligible person did not give at least 24 hours' notice of their intent to attend in person, or ii) The number of eligible persons who have given notice to attend in person exceeds the capacity of the meeting room that was listed in the meeting notice. c) Defines teleconferencing to include any electronic means that allows an eligible person to hear and interact with the board, such as a cell phone with a speakerphone or audio or video conferencing over the internet. AB 1077 Page 4 d) Requires that, if the board uses teleconferencing, it must provide the meeting materials to the eligible person either electronically or physically before the meeting begins. e) Provides that a board cannot prohibit a person from attending the meeting either in person or by teleconference. f) Makes several changes to the provisions allowing for executive sessions, including: i) Prohibits a board from meeting solely in an executive session and makes conforming changes to other provisions; ii) Specifies that a board may prohibit an eligible person from attending an executive session where matters relating to the potential acquisition, of real property or water rights will be discussed (in addition to the circumstances allowed under current law); iii) Specifies that when a board meets in executive session to consider litigation, the litigation must be pending or potential; iv) Requires the board to meet in executive session if requested by a member subject to discipline, and allows the member to attend such a session. Background Local agencies are subject to stringent requirements to hold open, public meetings when making decisions. The Ralph M. Brown Act, first enacted by the Legislature in 1953, is the set of state laws which guarantees the public's right to attend and participate in local legislative bodies' meetings. The Brown Act establishes procedures to ensure public access to information maintained by local agencies and that the decisions made by public agencies are done in an open and transparent fashion to retain public control over those agencies. As private corporations, mutual water companies are not subject to the Brown Act. Instead, state law gives mutual water AB 1077 Page 5 companies broad authority to specify in their articles and bylaws how their meetings are conducted, and who may attend. But because, some mutual water companies operate public water systems that provide water to consumers who are not shareholders, the Legislature passed AB 230 (Rendon, Chapter 633, Statutes of 2013) to increase transparency requirements. AB 230 established the Mutual Water Company Open Meeting Act, which imposes requirements on the meetings of the board of directors of mutual water companies that operate a public water system. AB 230 expanded the ability of Californians who are served by mutual water companies to attend board meetings. However, due to their small size and often-remote location, many mutual water companies struggle to accommodate all interested parties. Thus, despite these recent changes to state law, some residents served by mutual water companies-but who are not shareholders or members-are concerned that they are not being provided adequate access to the meetings of mutual water companies' boards. Comments 1)Purpose of the bill. This bill safeguards the ability of Californians served by mutual water companies to provide input on decisions that affect their water service. This bill modestly expands on the requirements established by the Mutual Water Company Open Meetings Act by enabling mutual water companies to use teleconferencing, to ensure that eligible people are able to attend meetings of the board. By making the use of teleconferencing permissive rather than prescriptive, this bill strikes a balance between ensuring that people served by mutual water companies have access to meetings without imposing burdensome requirements on small mutual water companies that don't have large meeting rooms or large budgets to procure additional space. In addition, the teleconferencing provision is flexible enough to allow for measures as simple as a speakerphone, to provide access to meetings that people would otherwise be excluded from those meetings. These changes further the intent of the Mutual Water Company Open Meetings Act, to promote better engagement between shareholders, customers, and board members. AB 1077 Page 6 2)Increased Burden on Private Companies. Opponents of the bill argue that this bill imposes a number of burdensome requirements on mutual water companies that other private companies do not have to meet. For example, the teleconferencing provisions of this bill potentially allow people who are not eligible to remotely attend private board meetings. In addition, it could require great expense to provide technology that provides for interaction with customers, which goes beyond the interaction that even public agencies are required to provide. Finally, this bill sets up mutual water companies, to violate the requirement to provide meeting materials to eligible persons that attend the meeting via teleconference by only giving the companies 24 hours to send out the materials. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:NoLocal: No SUPPORT: (Verified6/24/15) Sierra Club California OPPOSITION: (Verified6/24/15) Rubio Canon Mutual Water Company ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 75-0, 5/22/15 AYES: Achadjian, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins NO VOTE RECORDED: Alejo, O'Donnell, Olsen, Waldron, Weber AB 1077 Page 7 Prepared by:Anton Favorini-Csorba / GOV. & F. / (916) 651-4119 6/25/15 9:08:40 **** END ****