California Legislature—2015–16 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 1098


Introduced by Assembly Member Bloom

February 27, 2015


An act to amend Section 65089 of the Government Code, relating to transportation.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1098, as introduced, Bloom. Transportation: congestion management.

Existing law requires a congestion management plan to be developed, adopted, and updated biennially by a designated agency for every county that includes an urbanized area.

This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P1    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 65089 of the Government Code is
2amended to read:

3

65089.  

(a) A congestion management program shall be
4developed, adopted, and updated biennially, consistent with the
5schedule for adopting and updating the regional transportation
6improvement program, for every county that includes an urbanized
7area, and shall include every city and the county. The program
8shall be adopted at a noticed public hearing of the agency. The
9program shall be developed in consultation with, and with the
10cooperation of, the transportation planning agency, regional
P2    1transportation providers, local governments, the department, and
2the air pollution control district or the air quality management
3district, either by the county transportation commission, or by
4another public agency, as designated by resolutions adopted by
5the county board of supervisors and the city councils of a majority
6of the cities representing a majority of the population in the
7incorporated area of the county.

8(b) The program shall contain all of the following elements:

9(1) (A) Traffic level of service standards established for a
10system of highways and roadways designated by the agency. The
11highway and roadway system shall include at a minimum all state
12highways and principal arterials. No highway or roadway
13designated as a part of the system shall be removed from the
14system. All new state highways and principal arterials shall be
15designated as part of the system, except when it is within an infill
16opportunity zone. Level of service (LOS) shall be measured by
17Circular 212, by the most recent version of the Highway Capacity
18Manual, or by a uniform methodology adopted by the agency that
19is consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual. The
20determination as to whether an alternative method is consistent
21with the Highway Capacity Manual shall be made by the regional
22agency, except that the department instead shall make this
23determination if either (i) the regional agency is also the agency,
24as those terms are defined in Section 65088.1, or (ii) the department
25is responsible for preparing the regional transportation
26improvement plan for the county.

27(B) In no case shall the LOS standards established be below the
28level of service E or the current level, whichever is farthest from
29level of service A except when the area is in an infill opportunity
30zone. When thebegin delete level of serviceend deletebegin insert LOSend insert on a segment or at an
31intersection fails to attain the established level of service standard
32outside an infill opportunity zone, a deficiency plan shall be
33adopted pursuant to Section 65089.4.

34(2) A performance element that includes performance measures
35to evaluate current and future multimodal system performance for
36the movement of people and goods. At a minimum, these
37performance measures shall incorporate highway and roadway
38system performance, and measures established for the frequency
39and routing of public transit, and for the coordination of transit
40service provided by separate operators. These performance
P3    1measures shall support mobility, air quality, land use, and economic
2objectives, and shall be used in the development of the capital
3improvement program required pursuant to paragraph (5),
4deficiency plans required pursuant to Section 65089.4, and the
5land use analysis program required pursuant to paragraph (4).

6(3) A travel demand element that promotes alternative
7transportation methods, including, but not limited to, carpools,
8vanpools, transit, bicycles, and park-and-ride lots; improvements
9in the balance between jobs and housing; and other strategies,
10including, but not limited to, flexible work hours, telecommuting,
11and parking management programs. The agency shall consider
12parking cash-out programs during the development and update of
13the travel demand element.

14(4) A program to analyze the impacts of land use decisions made
15by local jurisdictions on regional transportation systems, including
16an estimate of the costs associated with mitigating those impacts.
17This program shall measure, to the extent possible, the impact to
18the transportation system using the performance measures
19described in paragraph (2). In no case shall the program include
20an estimate of the costs of mitigating the impacts of interregional
21travel. The program shall provide credit for local public and private
22contributions to improvements to regional transportation systems.
23However, in the case of toll road facilities, credit shall only be
24allowed for local public and private contributions which are
25unreimbursed from toll revenues or other state or federal sources.
26The agency shall calculate the amount of the credit to be provided.
27The program defined under this section may require
28implementation through the requirements and analysis of the
29California Environmental Quality Actbegin insert (Division 13 (commencing
30with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code)end insert
, in order to
31avoid duplication.

32(5) A seven-year capital improvement program, developed using
33the performance measures described in paragraph (2) to determine
34effective projects that maintain or improve the performance of the
35multimodal system for the movement of people and goods, to
36mitigate regional transportation impacts identified pursuant to
37paragraph (4). The program shall conform to transportation-related
38vehicle emission air quality mitigation measures, and include any
39project that will increase the capacity of the multimodal system.
40It is the intent of the Legislature that, when roadway projects are
P4    1identified in the program, consideration be given for maintaining
2bicycle access and safety at a level comparable to that which
3existed prior to the improvement or alteration. The capital
4improvement program may also include safety, maintenance, and
5rehabilitation projects that do not enhance the capacity of the
6system but are necessary to preserve the investment in existing
7facilities.

8(c) The agency, in consultation with the regional agency, cities,
9and the county, shall develop a uniform data base on traffic impacts
10for use in a countywide transportation computer model and shall
11approve transportation computer models of specific areas within
12the county that will be used by local jurisdictions to determine the
13quantitative impacts of development on the circulation system that
14are based on the countywide model and standardized modeling
15assumptions and conventions. The computer models shall be
16consistent with the modeling methodology adopted by the regional
17planning agency. The data bases used in the models shall be
18consistent with the data bases used by the regional planning agency.
19Where the regional agency has jurisdiction over two or more
20counties, the data bases used by the agency shall be consistent with
21the data bases used by the regional agency.

22(d) (1) The city or county in which a commercial development
23will implement a parking cash-out program that is included in a
24congestion management program pursuant to subdivision (b), or
25in a deficiency plan pursuant to Section 65089.4, shall grant to
26that development an appropriate reduction in the parking
27requirements otherwise in effect for new commercial development.

28(2) At the request of an existing commercial development that
29has implemented a parking cash-out program, the city or county
30shall grant an appropriate reduction in the parking requirements
31otherwise applicable based on the demonstrated reduced need for
32parking, and the space no longer needed for parking purposes may
33be used for other appropriate purposes.

34(e) Pursuant to the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation
35Efficiency Act of 1991 and regulations adopted pursuant to the
36act, the department shall submit a request to the Federal Highway
37Administration Division Administrator to accept the congestion
P5    1management program in lieu of development of a new congestion
2management system otherwise required by the act.



O

    99