AB 1098, as amended, Bloom. Transportation: congestion management.
Existing
end delete
begin insert(1)end insertbegin insert end insertbegin insertExistingend insert law requires a congestion managementbegin delete planend deletebegin insert programend insert
to be developed, adopted, and updated biennially by a designated agency for every county that includes an urbanized area.begin insert The congestion management program is required to contain specified elements and to be submitted to regional agencies, as defined, for determination of whether the program is consistent with regional transportation plans. The designated agency is then directed to monitor the implementation of all elements of the congestion management program. The required elements include, among other things, traffic level of service standards for a system of designated highways and roadways, a performance element that includes performance measures, and a 7-year capital improvement program. A city or county is required to prepare a deficiency plan when highway or roadway level of service standards are not maintained on segments or intersections of the designated system and is required to submit its
adopted deficiency plan to the designated agency.end insert
This bill wouldbegin delete make nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.end deletebegin insert delete the traffic level of service standards as an element of a congestion management program and would delete related requirements, including the requirement that a city or county prepare a deficiency plan when highway or roadway level of service standards are not maintained. The bill would revise and recast the requirements for other elements of a congestion management program by, among other things, requiring performance measures to include vehicle miles traveled, air emissions, and bicycle, transit, and pedestrian mode share and requiring the designated agency, for roadway capacity expansion projects, to include in the 7-year capital improvement program an
analysis of the potential for induced vehicle travel.end insert
The bill would require the regional agency to evaluate how the congestion management program contributes to achieving a specified greenhouse gas reduction target for the region established by the State Air Resources Board.
end insertbegin insertTo the extent that the above-described requirements impose additional duties on designated agencies and regional agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
end insertbegin insert(2) Existing law makes various legislative findings relative to congestion management programs.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would delete those legislative findings and would make new legislative findings relative to congestion management programs.
end insertbegin insert(3) This bill would make other technical and conforming changes to these provisions and would delete an obsolete provision.
end insertbegin insert(4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
end insertVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
State-mandated local program: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
begin insertSection 65088 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is
2repealed.end insert
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
4(a) Although California’s economy is critically dependent upon
5transportation, its current transportation system relies primarily
6upon a street and highway system designed to accommodate far
7fewer vehicles than are currently using the system.
8(b) California’s transportation system is characterized by
9fragmented planning, both among jurisdictions involved and among
10the means of available transport.
11(c) The lack of an integrated system and the increase in the
12number of vehicles are causing traffic congestion that each day
13results in 400,000 hours lost in traffic, 200 tons of pollutants
14released into the air we breathe, and three million one hundred
15thousand dollars ($3,100,000) added costs to the motoring public.
16(d) To keep California moving, all methods and means of
17transport between major destinations must be coordinated to
18connect our vital economic and population centers.
19(e) In order to develop the California economy to its full
20potential, it is intended that federal, state, and local agencies join
21with transit districts, business, private and environmental interests
22to develop and implement comprehensive strategies needed to
23develop appropriate responses to transportation needs.
24(f) In addition to solving California’s traffic congestion crisis,
25rebuilding California’s cities and suburbs, particularly with
26affordable housing and more walkable neighborhoods, is an
27important part of accommodating future increases in the state’s
28population because homeownership is only now available to most
29Californians who are on the fringes of metropolitan areas and far
30from employment centers.
31(g) The Legislature intends to do everything within its power
32to remove regulatory barriers around the development of infill
33housing, transit-oriented development, and mixed use commercial
34development in order to reduce regional traffic congestion and
35provide more housing choices for all Californians.
36(h) The removal of regulatory barriers to promote infill housing,
37transit-oriented development, or mixed use commercial
38development does not preclude a city or county from holding a
P4 1public hearing nor finding that an individual infill project would
2be adversely impacted by the surrounding environment or
3transportation patterns.
begin insertSection 65088 is added to the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert, to
5read:end insert
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
7(a) With the adoption of Senate Bill 375 (Chapter 728 of the
8Statutes of 2008), the Sustainable Communities and Climate
9Protection Act of 2008, the Legislature signaled its commitment
10to encouraging land use and transportation planning decisions
11and investments that reduce vehicle miles traveled and contribute
12to the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions required pursuant
13to Assembly Bill 32 (Chapter 488 of the Statutes of 2006), the
14California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Similarly, the
15California Complete Streets Act of 2008 (Chapter 657 of the
16Statutes of 2008) requires local governments to plan for a
17balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs
18of all users of streets, roads,
and highways for safe and convenient
19travel.
20(b) In order to fulfill the commitment to reduce greenhouse gas
21emissions and vehicle miles traveled, make the most efficient use
22of urban land and transportation infrastructure, and improve
23public health, increasing the number of trips taken by public
24transit, bicycling, and walking must be a significant part of short-
25and long-term planning goals at the local, regional, and state
26levels.
27(c) It is the intent of the Legislature to refocus the countywide
28congestion management planning process around developing an
29effective multimodal transportation system that enhances access
30to destinations while reducing vehicle miles traveled and
31greenhouse gas emissions and to better integrate congestion
32management planning with efforts to implement Assembly Bill 32,
33Senate Bill 375, and the Complete Streets
Act.
begin insertSection 65088.1 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is amended
35to read:end insert
As used in this chapter the following terms have the
37following meanings:
38(a) Unless the context requires otherwise, “agency” means the
39agency responsible for the preparation and adoption of the
40congestion management program.
P5 1(b) “Bus rapid transit corridor” means a bus service that includes
2at least four of the following attributes:
3(1) Coordination with land use planning.
end delete4(2) Exclusive right-of-way.
end delete5(3) Improved passenger boarding facilities.
end delete6(4) Limited stops.
end delete7(5) Passenger boarding at the same height as the bus.
end delete8(6) Prepaid fares.
end delete9(7) Real-time passenger information.
end delete10(8) Traffic priority at intersections.
end delete11(9) Signal priority.
end delete12(10) Unique vehicles.
end delete13(c)
end delete
14begin insert(end insertbegin insertb)end insert “Commission” means the California Transportation
15Commission.
16(d)
end delete17begin insert(end insertbegin insertc)end insert “Department” means the Department of Transportation.
18(e) “Infill opportunity zone” means a
specific area designated
19by a city or county, pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 65088.4,
20that is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality
21transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan. A major
22transit stop is as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources
23Code, except that, for purposes of this section, it also includes
24major transit stops that are included in the applicable regional
25transportation plan. For purposes of this section, a high-quality
26transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with
27service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute
28hours.
29(f) “Interregional travel” means any trips that originate outside
30the boundary of the agency. A “trip” means a one-direction vehicle
31movement. The origin of any trip is the starting point of that trip.
32A roundtrip consists of two individual trips.
33(g) “Level of service standard” is a threshold that defines a
34deficiency on the congestion management program highway and
35roadway system which requires the preparation of a deficiency
36plan. It is the intent of the Legislature that the agency shall use all
37elements of the program to implement strategies and actions that
38avoid the creation of deficiencies and to improve multimodal
39mobility.
40(h)
end delete
P6 1begin insert(end insertbegin insertd)end insert “Local jurisdiction” means a city, a county, or a city and
2county.
3(i) “Multimodal” means the utilization of all available modes
4of travel that enhance the movement of people and goods,
5including, but not limited to, highway, transit, nonmotorized, and
6demand management strategies including, but not limited to,
7telecommuting. The availability and practicality of specific
8multimodal systems, projects, and strategies may vary by county
9and region in accordance with the size and
complexity of different
10urbanized areas.
11(j)
end delete
12begin insert(end insertbegin inserte)end insert (1) “Parking cash-out program” means an employer-funded
13program under which an employer offers to provide a cash
14allowance to an employee equivalent to the parking subsidy that
15the employer would otherwise pay to provide the employee with
16a parking space. “Parking subsidy” means the difference between
17the out-of-pocket amount paid by an employer on a regular basis
18in order to secure the availability of an employee parking space
19not owned by the employer and the price, if any, charged to an
20employee for use of that space.
21(2) A parking cash-out program may include a requirement that
22employee participants certify that they will comply with guidelines
23established by the employer designed to avoid neighborhood
24parking problems, with a provision that employees not complying
25with the guidelines will no longer be eligible for the parking
26cash-out program.
27(k) “Performance measure” is an analytical planning tool that
28is used to quantitatively evaluate transportation improvements and
29to assist in determining effective implementation actions,
30considering all modes and strategies. Use of a performance measure
31as part of the program does not trigger the requirement for the
32preparation of deficiency plans.
33(l )
end delete
34begin insert(f)end insert “Urbanized area” has the same meaning as is defined in the
351990 federal census for urbanized areas of more than 50,000
36population.
37(m)
end delete
38begin insert(g)end insert Unless the context requires otherwise, “regional agency”
39means the agency responsible for preparation of the regional
40transportation improvement program.
begin insertSection 65088.4 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is repealed.end insert
(a) It is the intent of the Legislature to balance the
3need for level of service standards for traffic with the need to build
4infill housing and mixed use commercial developments within
5walking distance of mass transit facilities, downtowns, and town
6centers and to provide greater flexibility to local governments to
7balance these sometimes competing needs.
8(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, level of service
9standards described in Section 65089 shall not apply to the streets
10and highways within an infill opportunity zone.
11(c) The city or county may designate an infill opportunity zone
12by adopting a
resolution after determining that the infill opportunity
13zone is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific
14plan, and is a transit priority area within a sustainable communities
15strategy or alternative planning strategy adopted by the applicable
16metropolitan planning organization.
Section 65089 of the Government Code is amended
19to read:
(a) A congestion management program shall be
21developed, adopted, and updated biennially, consistent with the
22schedule for adopting and updating the regional transportation
23improvement program, for every county that includes an urbanized
24area, and shall include every city and the county. The program
25shall be adopted at a noticed public hearing of the agency. The
26program shall be developed in consultation with, and with the
27cooperation of, the transportation planning agency, regional
28transportation providers, local governments, the department, and
29the air pollution control district or the air quality management
30district, either by the county transportation commission, or by
31another public agency, as designated by resolutions adopted by
32the county board of supervisors and the city councils of
a majority
33of the cities representing a majority of the population in the
34incorporated area of the county.
35(b) The program shall contain all of the following elements:
36(1) (A) Traffic level of service standards established for a
37system of highways and roadways designated by the agency. The
38highway and roadway system shall include at a minimum all state
39highways and principal arterials. No highway or roadway
40designated as a part of the system shall be removed from the
P8 1system. All new state highways and principal arterials shall be
2designated as part of the system, except when it is within an infill
3opportunity zone. Level of service (LOS) shall be measured by
4Circular 212, by the
most recent version of the Highway Capacity
5Manual, or by a uniform methodology adopted by the agency that
6is consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual. The
7determination as to whether an alternative method is consistent
8with the Highway Capacity Manual shall be made by the regional
9agency, except that the department instead shall make this
10determination if either (i) the regional agency is also the agency,
11as those terms are defined in Section 65088.1, or (ii) the department
12is responsible for preparing the regional transportation
13improvement plan for the county.
14(B) In no case shall the LOS standards established be below the
15level of service E or the current level, whichever is farthest from
16level of service A except when the area is in an infill opportunity
17zone. When the LOS on a segment or at an intersection fails to
18attain the
established level of service standard outside an infill
19opportunity zone, a deficiency plan shall be adopted pursuant to
20Section 65089.4.
21(2)
end delete
22begin insert(end insertbegin insert1)end insert A performance element that includes performance measuresbegin insert,
23as determined by the regional agency,end insert to evaluate current and
24future multimodal systembegin delete performance for the movement of people begin insert
performance.end insert
At a minimum, these performance
25and goods.end delete
26measures shallbegin delete incorporate highway and roadway system begin insert include vehicle miles traveled, air
27performance, and measures established for the frequency and
28routing of public transit, and for the coordination of transit service
29provided by separate operators.end delete
30emissions, and bicycle, transit, and pedestrian mode share.end insert These
31performance measures shall supportbegin delete mobility,end deletebegin insert connectivity,end insert air
32quality, land use, and economic objectives, and shall be used in
33the development of the capital improvement program required
34pursuant to paragraphbegin delete (5), deficiency plans required pursuant to begin insert
(4)end insert and the land use analysis program required
35Section 65089.4,end delete
36pursuant to paragraphbegin delete (4).end deletebegin insert (3).end insert
37(3)
end delete
38begin insert(end insertbegin insert2)end insert A travel demand element that promotesbegin delete alternativeend deletebegin insert a broad
39range ofend insert
transportationbegin delete methods,end deletebegin insert
options,end insert including, but not limited
40to, carpools, vanpools, transit, bicycles,begin insert walking,end insert and park-and-ride
P9 1lots; improvements in the balance between jobs and housing; and
2other strategies, including, but not limited to, flexible work hours,
3telecommuting, and parking management programs. The agency
4shall consider parking cash-out programs during the development
5and update of the travel demand element.
6(4)
end delete
7begin insert(end insertbegin insert3)end insert A program to
analyze thebegin delete impacts ofend deletebegin insert
interaction betweenend insert
8 land use decisions made by local jurisdictionsbegin delete onend deletebegin insert and theend insert regional
9transportationbegin delete systems, including an estimate of the costs associated begin insert system.end insert This program
10with mitigating those impacts.end deletebegin delete shall measure,end delete
11begin insert shall,end insert to the extent possible,begin delete the impact to the transportation systemend delete
12begin insert
analyze local land use and transportation decisionsend insert
using the
13performance measures described in paragraphbegin delete (2). In no case shall begin insert (1).end insert The program shall provide
14the program include an estimate of the costs of mitigating the
15impacts of interregional travel.end delete
16credit for local public and private contributions to improvements
17to regional transportation systems. However, in the case of toll
18road facilities, credit shall only be allowed for local public and
19private contributions which are unreimbursed from toll revenues
20or other state or federal sources. The agency shall calculate the
21amount of the credit to be provided. begin deleteThe program defined under
22this section may require implementation through the requirements
23and analysis of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division
2413 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources
25Code), in order to avoid duplication.end delete
26(5)
end delete
27begin insert(end insertbegin insert4)end insert A seven-year capital improvement program, developed using
28the performance measures described in paragraphbegin delete (2) to determine begin insert (1), that includesend insert projects that maintain or improve the
29effectiveend delete
30performance of the multimodal system for the movement of people
31andbegin delete goods, to mitigate regional transportation impacts identified begin insert
goods.end insert
The program shall conform to
32pursuant to paragraph (4).end delete
33transportation-related vehicle emission air quality mitigation
34measures, and include any project that will increase the capacity
35of the multimodal system. It is the intent of the Legislature that,
36when roadway projects are identified in the program, consideration
37be given for maintaining bicycle access and safety at a level
38comparable tobegin insert or better thanend insert that which existed prior to the
39improvement or alteration.begin insert For roadway capacity expansion
40projects, the agency shall include an analysis of the potential for
P10 1induced vehicle travel.end insert The capital improvement program may
2also include safety, maintenance, and rehabilitation projects that
3do not enhance the capacity of the system but are necessary to
4preserve the investment in existingbegin insert
and newend insert facilities.
5(c) The agency, in consultation with the regional agency, cities,
6and the county, shall develop a uniform data base on traffic impacts
7for use in a countywide transportation computer model and shall
8approve transportation computer models of specific areas within
9the county that will be used by local jurisdictions to determine the
10quantitative impacts of development on the circulation system that
11are based on the countywide model and standardized modeling
12assumptions and conventions. The computer models shall be
13consistent with the modeling methodology adopted by the regional
14planning agency. The data bases used in the models shall be
15consistent with the data bases used by the regional planning agency.
16Where the regional agency has jurisdiction over two or more
17counties, the data bases used by the agency shall be consistent with
18the data bases used by the regional agency.
19(d) (1) The city or county in which a commercial development
20will implement a parking cash-out program that is included in a
21congestion management program pursuant to subdivisionbegin delete (b), or begin insert (b)end insert shall grant
22in a deficiency plan pursuant to Section 65089.4,end delete
23to that development an appropriate reduction in the parking
24requirements otherwise in effect for new commercial development.
25(2) At the request of an existing commercial development that
26has implemented a parking cash-out program, the city or county
27shall grant an appropriate reduction in the parking requirements
28otherwise applicable based on the demonstrated reduced need for
29parking, and the space no longer needed for
parking purposes may
30be used for other appropriate purposes.
31(e) Pursuant to the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation
32Efficiency Act of 1991 and regulations adopted pursuant to the
33act, the department shall submit a request to the Federal Highway
34Administration Division Administrator to accept the congestion
35management program in lieu of development of a new congestion
36management system otherwise required by the act.
begin insertSection 65089.2 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is amended
38to read:end insert
(a) Congestion management programs shall be
40submitted to the regional agency. The regional agency shall
P11 1evaluate the consistency between the program and the regional
2transportation plans required pursuant to Sectionbegin delete 65080.end deletebegin insert 65080, end insert
3begin insertincluding any adopted sustainable communities strategy. The
4regional agency shall additionally evaluate how the program
5contributes to achieving the greenhouse gas reduction target for
6the region established by the State Air Resources Board pursuant
7to Section 65080.end insert In the case of a multicounty regional
8
transportation planning agency, that agency shall evaluate the
9consistency and compatibility of the programs within the region.
10(b) The regional agency, upon finding that the program is
11consistent, shall incorporate the program into the regional
12transportation improvement program as provided for in Section
1365082. If the regional agency finds the program is inconsistent, it
14may exclude any project in the congestion management program
15from inclusion in the regional transportation improvement program.
16(c) (1) The regional agency shall not program any surface
17transportation program funds and congestion mitigation and air
18quality funds pursuant to Sections 182.6 and 182.7 of the Streets
19and Highways Code in a county unless a congestion management
20program has been adopted by December 31, 1992, as required
21pursuant to Section 65089. No surface transportation program
22
funds or congestion mitigation and air quality funds shall be
23programmed for a project in a local jurisdiction that has been found
24to be in nonconformance with a congestion management program
25pursuant to Section 65089.5 unless the agency finds that the project
26is of regional significance.
27(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon the
28designation of an urbanized area, pursuant to the 1990 federal
29census or a subsequent federal census, within a county which
30previously did not include an urbanized area, a congestion
31management program as required pursuant to Section 65089 shall
32be adopted within a period of 18 months after designation by the
33Governor.
34(d) (1) It is the intent of the Legislature that the regional agency,
35when its boundaries include areas in more than one county, should
36resolve inconsistencies and mediate disputes that arise between
37
agencies related to congestion management programs adopted for
38those areas.
39(2) It is the further intent of the Legislature that disputes that
40may arise between regional agencies, or agencies that are not within
P12 1the boundaries of a multicounty regional transportation planning
2agency, should be mediated and resolved by the Secretary of
3Transportation, or an employee of the Transportation Agency
4designated by the secretary, in consultation with the air pollution
5control district or air quality management district within whose
6boundaries the regional agency or agencies are located.
7(e) At the request of the agency, a local jurisdiction that owns,
8or is responsible for operation of, a trip-generating facility in
9another county shall participate in the congestion management
10program of the county where the facility is located. If a dispute
11arises involving a local jurisdiction, the
agency may request the
12regional agency to mediate the dispute through procedures pursuant
13to subdivision (d). Failure to resolve the dispute does not invalidate
14the congestion management program.
begin insertSection 65089.3 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is amended
16to read:end insert
The agency shall monitor the implementation of all
18elements of the congestion management program. The department
19is responsible for data collection and analysis on state highways,
20unless the agency designates that responsibility to another entity.
21The agency may also assign data collection and analysis
22responsibilities to other owners and operators of facilities or
23services if the responsibilities are specified in its adopted program.
24The agency shall consult with the department and other affected
25owners and operators in developing data collection and analysis
26procedures and schedules prior to program adoption. At least
27biennially, the agency shall determine if the county and cities are
28conforming to the congestion managementbegin delete program, including, begin insert
program.end insert
29but not limited to, all of the following:end delete
30(a) Consistency with levels
of service standards, except as
31provided in Section 65089.4.
32(b) Adoption and implementation of a program to analyze the
33impacts of land use decisions, including the estimate of the costs
34associated with mitigating these impacts.
35(c) Adoption and implementation of a deficiency plan pursuant
36to Section 65089.4 when highway and roadway level of service
37standards are not maintained on portions of the designated system.
begin insertSection 65089.4 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is repealed.end insert
(a) A local jurisdiction shall prepare a deficiency
40plan when highway or roadway level of service standards are not
P13 1maintained on segments or intersections of the designated system.
2The deficiency plan shall be adopted by the city or county at a
3noticed public hearing.
4(b) The agency shall calculate the impacts subject to exclusion
5pursuant to subdivision (f) of this section, after consultation with
6the regional agency, the department, and the local air quality
7management district or air pollution control district. If the
8calculated traffic level of service following exclusion of these
9impacts is consistent with the level of service standard, the agency
10shall make a finding at a publicly noticed meeting that no
11deficiency plan is required and so notify the affected local
12jurisdiction.
13(c) The agency shall be responsible for preparing and adopting
14procedures for local deficiency plan development and
15implementation responsibilities, consistent with the requirements
16of this section. The deficiency plan shall include all of the
17following:
18(1) An analysis of the cause of the deficiency. This analysis
19shall include the following:
20(A) Identification of the cause of the deficiency.
21(B) Identification of the impacts of those local jurisdictions
22within the jurisdiction of the agency that contribute to the
23deficiency. These impacts shall be identified only if the calculated
24traffic level of service following exclusion of impacts pursuant to
25subdivision (f) indicates that the level of service standard has not
26been maintained, and shall be limited to impacts not subject to
27exclusion.
28(2) A list of improvements necessary for the deficient segment
29or intersection to maintain the minimum level of service otherwise
30required and the estimated costs of the improvements.
31(3) A list of improvements, programs, or actions, and estimates
32of costs, that will (A) measurably improve multimodal
33performance, using measures defined in paragraphs (1) and (2) of
34subdivision (b) of Section 65089, and (B) contribute to significant
35improvements in air quality, such as improved public transit service
36and facilities, improved nonmotorized transportation facilities,
37high occupancy vehicle facilities, parking cash-out programs, and
38transportation control measures. The air quality management
39district or the air pollution control district shall establish and
40periodically revise a list of approved improvements, programs,
P14 1and actions that meet the scope of this paragraph. If an
2improvement, program, or action on the approved list has not been
3fully implemented, it shall be deemed to contribute to significant
4improvements in air quality. If an improvement, program, or action
5is not on the approved list, it shall not be implemented unless
6approved by the local air quality management district or air
7pollution control district.
8(4) An action plan, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 5
9(commencing with Section 66000), that shall be implemented,
10consisting of improvements identified in paragraph (2), or
11improvements, programs, or actions identified in paragraph (3),
12that are found by the agency to be in the interest of the public
13health, safety, and welfare. The action plan shall include a specific
14implementation schedule. The action plan shall include
15implementation strategies for those jurisdictions that have
16contributed to the cause of the deficiency in accordance with the
17agency’s deficiency plan procedures. The action plan need not
18mitigate the impacts of any exclusions identified in subdivision
19(f). Action plan strategies shall identify the most effective
20implementation strategies for improving current and future system
21performance.
22(d) A local jurisdiction shall forward its adopted deficiency plan
23to the agency within 12 months of the identification of a deficiency.
24The agency shall hold a noticed public hearing within 60 days of
25receiving the deficiency plan. Following that hearing, the agency
26shall either accept or reject the deficiency plan in its entirety, but
27the agency may not modify the deficiency plan. If the agency
28rejects the plan, it shall notify the local jurisdiction of the reasons
29for that rejection, and the local jurisdiction shall submit a revised
30plan within 90 days addressing the agency’s concerns. Failure of
31a local jurisdiction to comply with the schedule and requirements
32of this section shall be considered to be nonconformance for the
33purposes of Section 65089.5.
34(e) The agency shall incorporate into its deficiency plan
35procedures, a methodology for determining if deficiency impacts
36are caused by more than one local jurisdiction within the
37boundaries of the agency.
38(1) If, according to the agency’s methodology, it is determined
39that more than one local jurisdiction is responsible for causing a
40deficient segment or intersection, all responsible local jurisdictions
P15 1shall participate in the development of a deficiency plan to be
2adopted by all participating local jurisdictions.
3(2) The local jurisdiction in which the deficiency occurs shall
4have lead responsibility for developing the deficiency plan and for
5coordinating with other impacting local jurisdictions. If a local
6jurisdiction responsible for participating in a multi-jurisdictional
7deficiency plan does not adopt the deficiency plan in accordance
8with the schedule and requirements of paragraph (a) of this section,
9that jurisdiction shall be considered in nonconformance with the
10program for purposes of Section 65089.5.
11(3) The agency shall establish a conflict resolution process for
12addressing conflicts or disputes between local jurisdictions in
13meeting the multi-jurisdictional deficiency plan responsibilities
14of this section.
15(f) The analysis of the cause of the deficiency prepared pursuant
16to paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) shall exclude the following:
17(1) Interregional travel.
18(2) Construction, rehabilitation, or maintenance of facilities that
19impact the system.
20(3) Freeway ramp metering.
21(4) Traffic signal coordination by the state or multi-jurisdictional
22agencies.
23(5) Traffic generated by the provision of low-income and very
24low income housing.
25(6) (A) Traffic generated by high-density residential
26development located within one-fourth mile of a fixed rail
27passenger station, and
28(B) Traffic generated by any mixed use development located
29within one-fourth mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more
30than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use
31development is used for high density residential housing, as
32determined by the agency.
33(g) For the purposes of this section, the following terms have
34the following meanings:
35(1) “High density” means residential density development which
36contains a minimum of 24 dwelling units per acre and a minimum
37density per acre which is equal to or greater than 120 percent of
38the maximum residential density allowed under the local general
39plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75
P16 1dwelling units per acre shall automatically be considered high
2density.
3(2) “Mixed use development” means development which
4integrates compatible commercial or retail uses, or both, with
5residential uses, and which, due to the proximity of job locations,
6shopping opportunities, and residences, will discourage new trip
7generation.
begin insertSection 65089.5 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is amended
9to read:end insert
(a) If, pursuant to the monitoring provided for in
11Section 65089.3, the agency determines, following a noticed public
12hearing, that a city or county is not conforming with the
13requirements of the congestion management program, the agency
14shall notify the city or county in writing of the specific areas of
15nonconformance. If, within 90 days of the receipt of the written
16notice of nonconformance, the city or county has not come into
17conformance with the congestion management program, the
18governing body of the agency shall make a finding of
19nonconformance and shall submit the finding to the commission
20and to the Controller.
21(b) (1) Upon receiving notice from the agency of
22nonconformance, the Controller
shall withhold apportionments of
23funds required to be apportioned to that nonconforming city or
24county by Section 2105 of the Streets and Highways Code.
25(2) If, within the 12-month period following the receipt of a
26notice of nonconformance, the Controller is notified by the agency
27that the city or county is in conformance, the Controller shall
28allocate the apportionments withheld pursuant to this section to
29the city or county.
30(3) If the Controller is not notified by the agency that the city
31or county is in conformance pursuant to paragraph (2), the
32Controller shall allocate the apportionments withheld pursuant to
33this section to the agency.
34(c) The agency shall use funds apportioned under this section
35for projects of regional significance which are included in the
36capital improvement program required by paragraphbegin delete (5)end deletebegin insert
(4)end insert
of
37subdivision (b) of Sectionbegin delete 65089, or in a deficiency plan which begin insert 65089.end insert The agency shall not use
38has been adopted by the agency.end delete
39these funds for administration or planning purposes.
begin insertSection 65089.7 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is amended
2to read:end insert
A proposed development specified in a development
4agreement entered into prior to July 10, 1989, shall not be subject
5to any action taken to comply with this chapter, except actions
6required to be taken with respect to the trip reduction and travel
7demand element of a congestion management program pursuant
8to paragraphbegin delete (3)end deletebegin insert (2)end insert of subdivision (b) of Section 65089.
begin insertSection 65089.9 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is repealed.end insert
The study steering committee established pursuant
11to Section 6 of Chapter 444 of the Statutes of 1992 may designate
12at least two congestion management agencies to participate in a
13demonstration study comparing multimodal performance standards
14to highway level of service standards. The department shall make
15available, from existing resources, fifty thousand dollars ($50,000)
16from the Transportation Planning and Development Account in
17the State Transportation Fund to fund each of the demonstration
18projects. The designated agencies shall submit a report to the
19Legislature not later than June 30, 1997, regarding the findings of
20each demonstration project.
begin insertSection 65089.10 of the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert is amended
22to read:end insert
Any congestion management agency that is located
24in the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and receives
25funds pursuant to Section 44241 of the Health and Safety Code
26for the purpose of implementing paragraphbegin delete (3)end deletebegin insert (2)end insert of subdivision
27(b) of Section 65089 shall ensure that those funds are expended
28as part of an overall program for improving air quality and for the
29purposes of this chapter.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
31this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
32local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
33pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
344 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
O
98