BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1101 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 1101 (Bonilla) As Amended May 20, 2015 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+------+---------------------+---------------------| |Education |7-0 |O'Donnell, Chávez, | | | | |Kim, McCarty, | | | | |Santiago, Thurmond, | | | | |Weber | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Requires a school district that elects to undertake an investigation to determine whether a pupil meets residency requirements to adopt a policy regarding the investigation of a pupil before investigating any pupils. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires the policy to identify the circumstances upon which the school district may initiate an investigation, which shall, at a minimum, require the school district employee to be able to identify specific, articulable facts supporting the belief that the parent or legal guardian of the pupil has provided false or unreliable evidence of residency. AB 1101 Page 2 2)Requires the policy to describe the investigatory methods that may be used by the school district in the conduct of the investigation, including whether the district will be employing the services of a private investigator. 3)Requires the policy to prohibit the surreptitious photographing of pupils who are being investigated. 4)Specifies that the policy shall require that employees and contractors of the school district engaged in the investigation must identify themselves truthfully as such to individuals contacted or interviewed during the course of the investigation. 5)Requires the policy to provide a process whereby the determination of a school district as to whether a pupil meets the residency requirements for school attendance in the school district may be appealed, and specify the basis for that determination. Specifies that if an appeal is made, the burden shall be on the appealing party to show why the decision of the school district should be overruled. 6)Requires the policy required pursuant to this bill to be adopted at a public meeting of the governing board of the school district. FISCAL EFFECT: None COMMENTS: Under current law, compulsory education begins at age six until age 18. Any person subject to compulsory education found away from home without a valid excuse for not attending school can be arrested by school officials or peace or probation AB 1101 Page 3 officers. A pupil is required to attend school in the district in which the residency of either the parent or legal guardian is located. Documentation of residency includes property tax payment receipts; rental property contract, lease, or payment receipts; utility service contract, statement, or payment receipts; pay stubs; voter registration; correspondence from a government agency; or declaration of residency executed by the parent or legal guardian. If an employee of a school district reasonably believes that the parent or legal guardian of a pupil has provided false or unreliable evidence of residency, the school district is authorized to make reasonable efforts to determine whether the pupil meets residency requirements. What does this bill do? This bill requires a school district that elects to investigate a pupil's residency to adopt a policy regarding such investigations. This bill requires the policy to be adopted at a governing board meeting and to contain the following: 1)Identify the circumstances upon which the school district may initiate an investigation, which shall, at a minimum, require the school district employee to be able to identify specific, articulable facts supporting the belief that the parent or legal guardian of the pupil has provided false or unreliable evidence of residency. The policy must also describe the investigatory method to be used by the school district to conduct the investigation, including whether the district will be hiring private investigators. 2)Prohibit photographing of a pupil involved in the investigation. 3)Require that employees and contractors of the school district must identify themselves truthfully when contacting or interviewing individuals during the investigation. AB 1101 Page 4 4)Provide an appeals process. If a parent or legal guardian appeals the decision of a school district, the burden for showing why the decision should be overruled falls on the appealing party. Purpose of this bill. The author states, "Schools should have tools available to investigate residency issues, but we need to ensure safeguards are in place to protect those students being investigated especially elementary school-aged children." The author cites, as an example, a Contra Costa Times report of the investigatory tactics undertaken by investigators hired by the Orinda Union School District to investigate a seven-year-old girl the school district disenrolled last fall. According to the article, the investigator told the mother of the child named Vivian and neighbors at the family's old neighborhood that he was a car insurance investigator. The school district later reversed the decision to remove the child from the school district when it learned that the mother was a live-in nanny for a couple residing in the Orinda Union School District that was her primary residence. The little girl was in the other neighborhood spending time with her great-grandmother, who was ill. The article reports that hiring investigators to investigate residency issues is not uncommon, especially for smaller school districts that are unable to dedicate staff for this purpose. Investigators interviewed in the article acknowledge that they do hide their identity in hopes that people will "rat the kids out" unwittingly. Current law simply says that a school district may make "reasonable efforts" to determine a pupil's residency. The law does not specify how that is to be done. It is unclear how many districts hire private investigators to conduct residency checks. School districts are funded through the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) based on an average daily attendance basis. Increasing enrollment increases funding for AB 1101 Page 5 schools, except for those deemed basic aid districts. Basic aid districts do not receive or receive minimal LCFF because their local property taxes provide higher levels of funding than they would receive through LCFF. These districts would not benefit from increased enrollment. A basic aid status can fluctuate from year to year. In 2014 to 2015, there were 144 basic aid districts in the state. The author may wish to consider requiring a school district to make an attempt to reconcile any questions or problems (e.g., two documents containing two different addresses) prior to hiring an investigator. A parent or legal guardian may be able to clear up any discrepancy or the parent or legal guardian may tell the truth, which could avoid the employment of a private investigator. Arguments in support. The author states, "AB 1101 protects student safety and privacy by requiring school boards to adopt a policy when a private investigator is hired to conduct an investigation to determine whether a student resides within the school district boundaries. AB 1101 protects children, like Vivian, from questionable investigatory techniques such as lying to family members and neighbors and taking surreptitious photos of young students. This bill creates more transparency and disclosure in student residency investigations and provides for due process in challenging a student's home residency." Arguments in opposition. The California School Boards Association states that this bill "enables those looking to evade a school district's efforts to implement statutory residency criteria by requiring governing boards to adopt board policies containing details about the procedures and parameters of these investigations. The requirement that districts' identify specific, articulable facts' supporting their findings could force districts to compromise the confidentiality of those who provide information in connection to investigations. The latter would AB 1101 Page 6 have a detrimental effect on the willingness of school district employees and community members to provide true and accurate information to investigators." Analysis Prepared by: Sophia Kwong Kim / ED. / (916) 319-2087 FN: 0000485