BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1110


                                                                    Page  1


          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB  
          1110 (Ting)


          As Amended  August 19, 2016


          Majority vote


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |      |(May 11, 2015) |SENATE: |26-12 |(August 23,      |
          |           |      |               |        |      |2016)            |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
                 (vote not relevant)


           ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |COMMITTEE VOTE: |     | (August 30,    |RECOMMENDATION:   |concur     |
          |                |11-3 |2016)           |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
           ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
           (U. & C.)




          Original Committee Reference:  Rev. & Tax.


          SUMMARY:  Modifies current requirements to report sources of  
          electricity by every retail supplier of electricity in  








                                                                    AB 1110


                                                                    Page  2


          California to also annually report to its customers the  
          greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions intensity of the supplier's  
          electricity sources.


          The Senate amendments delete the previous content of the bill  
          and replace it with the following:


          1)Require the California Energy Commission (CEC), on or before  
            January 1, 2018, to adopt guidelines for the reporting and  
            disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions intensity and requires  
            retail supplies to begin to report GHG data beginning January  
            1, 2020.
          2)Require the CEC to calculate GHG intensity for total  
            California electricity sales and to adopt guidelines for  
            reporting and disclosing GHG emissions associated with retail  
            electricity sales; 


          3)Allow publicly-owned utilities (POUs) to include, in its  
            annual disclosures, GHG-free generation from prior years as  
            authorized by the CEC.


          4)Make conforming changes to definitions in existing law  
            relating to disclosure requirements. 


          5)Provide a Community Choice Aggregator (CCA) formed after  
            January 1, 2016, up to three years to comply with the GHG  
            reporting requirements.


          6)Require retail suppliers, beginning June 1, 2020, to report  
            data on GHG emissions intensity associated with retail sales  
            occurring after December 31, 2018, except as provided.


          EXISTING LAW: 










                                                                    AB 1110


                                                                    Page  3


          1)Requires entities offering electric services in California  
            disclose accurate, reliable, and simple to understand  
            information on the sources of energy that are used to provide  
            electric service.  (Public Utilities Code Section 398.1)
          2)Defines the terms "specific purchases" and "unspecified  
            sources of power."  (Public Utilities Code Section 398.2)


          3)Specifies requirements for an annual disclosure of sources of  
            electricity associated with electricity sales by retail  
            suppliers of electricity.  (Public Utilities Code Section  
            398.4)


          4)Requires retail sellers of electricity to report sales and its  
            annual disclosure of sources of electricity to the CEC and  
            requires the CEC to specify guidelines and standard formats  
            for disclosures.  (Public Utilities Code Section 398.5)


          5)Requires retail sellers of electricity - investor-owned  
            utilities (IOUs), CCAs, and energy service providers (ESPs) -  
            and POUs to increase purchases of renewable energy such that  
            at least 50% of retail sales are procured from renewable  
            energy resources by December 31, 2030.  This is known as the  
            Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS).  (Public Utilities Code  
            Section 399.11 et seq.)


          6)Requires all renewable electricity products counting toward  
            RPS requirements to from one of three product categories (or  
            "buckets") and specifies maximum allowed quantities:  a)  
            renewable resources directly connected to a California  
            balancing authority or provided in real time without  
            substitution from another energy source; b) energy not  
            connected or delivered in real time yet still delivering  
            electricity; and c) unbundled renewable energy credits (RECs).  
             (Public Utilities Code Section 399.16.)


          7)Requires the reduction of statewide emissions of GHGs to 1990  
            levels by 2020.  This is known as the Global Warming Solutions  








                                                                    AB 1110


                                                                    Page  4


            Act of 2006.  (Health and Safety Code Section 38500 et seq.)


          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown.


          COMMENTS: 


          1)Background:  Suppliers of electricity must disclose power  
            sources.  Existing statute requires retail suppliers - IOUs,  
            POUs, CCAs, and ESPs - to disclose fuel source information to  
            potential end-use customers in a way that is accurate,  
            reliable, and simple to understand.  The disclosure is  
            governed by the CEC's Power Source Disclosure Program, by  
            which the CEC specifies a standard format the retail suppliers  
            are to use.  That format is known as the Power Content Label. 
            The Power Content Label presents retail supplier fuel source  
            information in two broad categories:  a) specific purchases  
            and b) unspecified sources of power.  The label breaks out the  
            first category, specific purchases, into several  
            subcategories:  eligible renewables (meaning eligible for RPS  
            credit), coal, large hydroelectric, natural gas, nuclear, and  
            other.  The label provides no additional detail to the second  
            category, unspecified sources of power, because such  
            electricity, by definition, is not traceable to a specific  
            generation source.  In addition, the label presents comparison  
            data on the power mix for all retail electricity deliveries in  
            California.


            The Power Content Label is not without controversy.  Some  
            parties contend the bill potentially confuses customers,  
            despite the statutory direction that the label is to be  
            accurate, reliable, and simple to understand.  For example,  
            some parties have complained that the reporting periods and  
            reporting specifications required of retail suppliers of  
            electricity differ from the reporting periods and reporting  
            specifications of other state programs.  Others contend the  
            label misleads customers on the supplier's progress in meeting  
            the RPS.  









                                                                    AB 1110


                                                                    Page  5



            Still others contend that the Power Content Label, first  
            created nearly two decades ago, needs updating to reflect the  
            state's current environmental policies and priorities.   
            Specifically, bill proponents argue the current Power Content  
            Label does not currently include information on GHG intensity  
            associated with the sellers' sources of electricity.  This  
            bill would add a GHG emissions intensity factor to the statute  
            requiring power source disclosure.


          2)Rollover Credits?  This bill establishes a new provision in  
            the disclosure rules that would allow a POU to "rollover" GHG  
            credits from prior years and use them in a current year.  This  
            bill requires the CEC to establish guidelines for these  
            adjustments that demonstrate generation of quantities of  
            electricity in previous years in excess of total retail and  
            wholesale sales.
            This specific provision allows the carryover of excess zero  
            GHG electricity "generation" in a manner that limits  
            applicability only if certain conditions are met,  
            specifically, the POU must generate electricity, with its own  
            utility-owned facilities, more zero GHG electricity than is  
            needed to satisfy its entire retail sales.  A POU that  
            procures electricity from a third-party could not meet the  
            conditions to quality to use rollover GHG credits from prior  
            years.  At this time, the only POU that appears to qualify for  
            this provision is San Francisco.


            The same provision references the ability to adjust the GHG  
            emissions intensity factor for one year based on "previous  
            years."  There is no definition of what is meant by "previous  
            years."  This is open to interpretation by the CEC, therefore  
            the committee may want to recommend that the CEC limit the  
            historic period available for carryover to no earlier than the  
            date of enactment of this bill.  Further, the committee may  
            want to recommend disclosure whenever GHG emission factors are  
            included from previous years.


            This provision also permits the carryover of zero GHG value if  








                                                                    AB 1110


                                                                    Page  6


            the excess power is sold into the market as an "unspecified  
            source."  If the zero GHG value of this power is being applied  
            to a future year, the CEC should consider adjusting the GHG  
            emissions intensity of "system power" to ensure that the zero  
            GHG quality of such sales is not included in the calculation  
            of the "system power" intensity factor. 


          3)Prior/Related Legislation:
            SB 1305 (Sher), Chapter 796, Statutes of 1997:  First required  
            retail suppliers to disclose their power sources.


            AB 162 (Ruskin), Chapter 313, Statutes of 2009:  Modifies and  
            streamlines power source disclosure reporting requirements for  
            POUs and other electricity providers.


            SB 456 (Padilla) of 2013-14:  Would have added two categories  
            of fuel source information to the Power Content Label:  energy  
            storage and out-of-state generation.  Died in the Assembly  
            Utilities and Commerce Committee.


          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Sue Kateley / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083  FN:  
          0004994