BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



          SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
                          Senator Ed Hernandez, O.D., Chair

          BILL NO:                    AB 1117             
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |AUTHOR:        |Cristina Garcia                                |
          |---------------+-----------------------------------------------|
          |VERSION:       |June 1, 2015                                   |
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |HEARING DATE:  |July 1, 2015   |               |               |
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |CONSULTANT:    |Scott Bain                                     |
           --------------------------------------------------------------- 
          
           SUBJECT  :  Medi-Cal: vaccination rates.

           SUMMARY  : Requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to  
          establish and administer the California Childhood Immunization  
          Quality Improvement Fund (CCIQIF) program to improve childhood  
          immunization rates as a waiver or demonstration project.  
          Requires DHCS to allocate 33% of CCIQIF expenditures for use by  
          DHCS for administrative staff, training, and other resources to  
          support providers in employing strategies to improve  
          immunization rates in their practices, and 66.7% of CCIQIF  
          expenditures for $125 reward payments to Medi-Cal managed care  
          plans for each enrollee who receives all recommended  
          vaccinations by the time he or she reaches two years of age.  
          Sunsets this bill on the date that the DHCS director executes a  
          declaration stating that the demonstration project has  
          concluded.
          Existing law:
          1)Establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by  
            DHCS, under which qualified low-income individuals receive  
            health care services. Children up to age 19 are eligible for  
            Medi-Cal in families with incomes up to 266% of the federal  
            poverty level (at or below $52,641 annually for a family of 3  
            in 2015).

          2)Provides, under federal Medicaid law, coverage of "early and  
            periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services"  
            (EPSDT) for individuals under age 21, which includes coverage  
            for pediatric vaccines.

          3)Requires DHCS to pay capitation rates to Medi-Cal managed care  
            plans using actuarial methods. Permits DHCS to establish  
            health-plan- and county-specific rates, and permits DHCS to  
            pay plans based on performance incentives, including quality  







          AB 1117 (Cristina Garcia)                         Page 2 of ?
          
          
            indicators, access to care, and data submission.

          This bill:
          1)Requires DHCS to establish and administer the CCIQIF program  
            to improve childhood immunization rates.

          2)Requires DHCS to submit an application to the federal Centers  
            for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for a waiver or  
            demonstration project to implement the CCIQIF program no later  
            than 270 days after the operative date of this bill. Requires  
            DHCS to determine the form of waiver most appropriate to  
            achieve the purposes of this bill. Requires the demonstration  
            project to operate for a period of five years.

          3)Requires DHCS to develop a plan for the collection and  
            expenditure of CCIQIF moneys according to all of the following  
            guidelines:

               a)     Permits the CCIQIF program to be financed through  
                 voluntary contributions from Medi-Cal managed care plans,  
                 which are required to be used to draw down federal  
                 financial participation (FFP) consistent with federal  
                 law;

               b)     Requires DHCS to allocate 33.3% of CCIQIF  
                 expenditures for use by DHCS for administrative staff,  
                 training, and other resources to support providers in  
                 employing strategies to improve immunization rates in  
                 their practices, which may include patient reminders,  
                 promotion of colocation vaccination delivery with other  
                 services, and other strategies as specified. Requires the  
                 funds to also be used to pay for DHCS staffing and  
                 administrative costs directly attributable to  
                 implementing this bill, including costs related to  
                 developing and seeking federal approval for the CCIQIF  
                 and administering the fund ;

               c)     Requires DHCS to allocate 66.7% of CCIQIF  
                 expenditures for reward payments to Medi-Cal managed care  
                 plans. Requires the rate of the reward to be $125 for  
                 each enrollee who receives all recommended vaccinations  
                 by the time he or she reaches two years of age, as  
                 determined by the Childhood Immunization Status measure  
                 of the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set  
                 (HEDIS);








          AB 1117 (Cristina Garcia)                         Page 3 of ?
          
          

               d)     Requires at least 20% of the 66.7% of CCIQIF  
                 expenditures to be used for reward payments to be passed  
                 through to contracted providers based on the number of  
                 Medi-Cal enrollees who are under two years of age in each  
                 provider's respective panel.

               e)     Requires any unearned reward payment expenditures to  
                 roll over to the subsequent demonstration project year.  
                 Requires, if all reward payment expenditures are earned  
                 within a demonstration project year, no additional reward  
                 payments to be distributed until the next demonstration  
                 project year begins; and,

          4)Requires DHCS, in developing the waiver or demonstration  
            project application, to consult with interested stakeholders,  
            including the Medi-Cal Children's Health Advisory Panel and  
            the Managed Care Advisory Workgroup, and to work with  
            stakeholders to incorporate public comment into the waiver or  
            demonstration project application.

          5)Requires DHCS to contract with the University of California or  
            any other researchers to develop and submit to the Legislature  
            an evaluation of the effectiveness of the demonstration  
            project using data collected from the first three years of the  
            waiver period or demonstration project. Requires the  
            evaluation to be submitted within the fourth year of the  
            waiver period or demonstration project. Requires the  
            evaluation, at a minimum, to include an assessment of the most  
            effective administrative support strategies.

          6)Requires the evaluation to be financed with no more than five  
            percent of the total annual CCIQIF program expenditure dollars  
            from the 66.7% of CCIFQI expenditures. Requires CCIQIF  
            provider support expenditures to be reduced, commensurate with  
            available funds, to offset the cost of the evaluation contract  
            during the waiver or demonstration project year that the  
            evaluation is commissioned.

          7)Requires this bill to be implemented only if and to the extent  
            that FFP is available and any necessary federal approvals have  
            been obtained.

          8)Sunsets this bill on the date that the Director of DHCS  
            executes a declaration stating that the demonstration project  








          AB 1117 (Cristina Garcia)                         Page 4 of ?
          
          
            has concluded, and repeals this bill six months after the date  
            the declaration is executed.

          9)Makes legislative findings and declarations regarding  
            vaccine-preventable diseases, vaccine rates for California  
            children between the ages of 19 to 35 months as compared to  
            national rates, the number of two-year olds who are not fully  
            immunized, the social and economic costs of ensuring each  
            child receives the recommended schedule of vaccines. States  
            legislative intent in implementing this bill to ensure that  
            all possible steps are taken to ensure that two-year-old  
            children who are enrolled in Medi-Cal managed care receive all  
            recommended immunizations.

           FISCAL  
          EFFECT  : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee:

          1)DHCS would incur costs in the range of low hundreds of  
            thousands of dollars (program revenues/federal funds), to  
            develop and seek federal approval for a program. The annual  
            administrative costs would be of a similar magnitude.


          2)It is unclear precisely how much funding would be raised. A  
            successful incentive program could be about $30 million per  
            year (program revenues/federal funds), with $10 million  
            allocated to provider support.


           PRIOR  
          VOTES  :  
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Assembly Floor:                     |65 - 12                     |
          |------------------------------------+----------------------------|
          |Assembly Appropriations Committee:  |13 - 1                      |
          |------------------------------------+----------------------------|
          |Assembly Health Committee:          |18 - 0                      |
          |                                    |                            |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          COMMENTS  :
          1)Author's statement. According to the author, Medi-Cal health  
            plans and providers need greater investments and supports to  
            provide the quality health care services that they are  








          AB 1117 (Cristina Garcia)                         Page 5 of ?
          
          
            required to deliver to young children and that parents and  
            taxpayers deserve. This bill would bring additional resources  
            to the health care system to help improve California's  
            relatively low vaccination rates for 2-year-olds, without  
            impacting parents' ability to make decisions about their  
            children's health care.

          2)Background. Of the 12.4 million individuals expected to enroll  
            in Medi-Cal in 2015-16, approximately 76% will be enrolled in  
            Medi-Cal managed care plans. DHCS contracts with 23  
            full-service Medi-Cal managed care plans to provide health  
            care services to Medi-Cal enrollees. Roughly half of  
            California children are enrolled in Medi-Cal, including  
            644,927 Medi-Cal managed care plan members 2 years of age or  
            younger as of January 1, 2015. 

          CMS requires states, through their contracts with managed care  
            plans, to measure and report on performance to assess the  
            quality and appropriateness of care and services provided to  
            members. DHCS implemented a monitoring system to provide an  
            objective, comparative review of Medi-Cal managed care plans  
            quality-of-care outcomes and performance measures called the  
            External Accountability Set (EAS). DHCS designates performance  
            measures annually, and requires Medi-Cal managed care plans to  
            report on them. 

          The DHCS 2013 EAS for the Medi-Cal managed care plans consisted  
            of 15 performance measures with 32 distinct indicators  
            providing information on access to care for women,  
            adolescents, and children; use of imaging studies for low back  
            pain; screening for diseases such as cervical cancer; weight  
            assessment and counseling for nutrition and physical activity  
            for children and adolescents; care provided to members with  
            chronic diseases such as diabetes; hospital readmissions  
            rates; and utilization of outpatient and emergency department  
            care. DHCS based all selected performance measures for  
            Medi-Cal on HEDIS, with the exception of an internally  
            developed measure (All-Cause Readmissions). 
          
          3)Immunization Rates by Plans/Regions. The HEDIS data set is a  
            nationally recognized and standardized set of performance  
            measures used by consumers, employers, government agencies,  
            legislators, advocates, and potential purchasers to assess the  
            quality of care provided within a managed care plan's  
            Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial lines of business. One of  








          AB 1117 (Cristina Garcia)                         Page 6 of ?
          
          
            the HEDIS measures used to assess Medi-Cal managed care plans  
            is childhood immunization status for children under age two.  
            That measure calculates the percentage of children identified  
            as having the following vaccinations: four diphtheria,  
            tetanus, and pertussis (DTaP); three inactivated poliovirus  
            (IPV); one measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR); three  
            Haemophilus influenza type B (HiB); three hepatitis B; one  
            varicella -zoster virus (chicken pox or VZV); and four  
            pneumococcal conjugate vaccinations on or before the child's  
            second birthday. 


            The Medi-Cal managed care weighted average vaccination rate  
            was 78.2% in 2012 and 77.25% in 2013. In measuring plan  
            performance, Medi-Cal compares plans by region, so a plan that  
            is in multiple regions receives a rate for each region (for  
            example, Blue Cross is in 9 regions). In the 2013 rating,  
            seven plan rates were above the high performance level in 2013  
            (the high performance level is HEDIS 2012 national Medicaid  
            90th percentile) with vaccination rates above 82.84%. Four  
            rates scored below the minimum performance level in 2012 (the  
            minimum performance level is HEDIS 2012 national Medicaid 25th  
            percentile) or a vaccination rate below 64.72%. National HEDIS  
            figures for 2010-12 are as follows:


                                                                            
                                                              2010          
                 2011                2012


               National Medicaid Average                69.40%             
          69.90%            70.64%
               National Commercial Average            73.40%             
          75.10%            75.66%

          4)Pay-for-Performance in Medi-Cal. DHCS has the authority under  
            existing law to implement pay-for-performance in Medi-Cal  
            managed care, but does not currently pay quality bonuses or  
            otherwise have a pay-for-performance program for Medi-Cal  
            managed care plans, with the exception of quality withholds  
            for payments to Medi-Cal plans participating in the  
            CalMediConnect demonstration pilot program for individuals  
            dually eligible for Medicare and Medi-Cal. DHCS also does not  
            provide incentive payments to outpatient health care providers  








          AB 1117 (Cristina Garcia)                         Page 7 of ?
          
          
            in fee-for-service Medi-Cal for achieving quality benchmarks. 

          DHCS does use plan performance to determine assignment rate of  
            Medi-Cal beneficiaries who are required to enroll in a managed  
            care plan but who do not affirmatively choose a plan (referred  
            to as "auto assignment"). Auto assignment is based in part on  
            plan performance on HEDIS measures and utilization of safety  
            net providers in a plan's network (specifically, the  
            percentage of hospital discharges at a disproportionate share  
            hospital for members residing within the county, and the  
            percentage of members assigned to primary care providers who  
            are safety net providers). As part of the state's Section 1115  
            waiver renewal, DHCS is proposing to include  
            pay-for-performance with its contracting health plans.
          
          5)Related legislation. SB 277 (Pan and Allen), eliminates the  
            personal belief exemption from the requirement that children  
            receive specified vaccines for certain infectious diseases  
            prior to being admitted to any public or private elementary or  
            secondary school or day care center.  SB 277 passed the  
            Assembly Floor on June 25, 2015.


          6)Support. This bill is sponsored by Children NOW to provide  
            Medi-Cal health plans and health care providers with greater  
            investments and supports to provide the quality health care  
            services that they are required to deliver to young children  
            and that parents and taxpayers deserve. Children NOW argues  
            this bill would bring additional resources to the health care  
            system to help improve California's relatively low vaccination  
            rates for 2-year-olds, without impacting parents' ability to  
            make decisions about their children's health care. Children  
            NOW states vaccination rates for kids are not as high as they  
            need to be, posing a risk for all children, as demonstrated by  
            the 11,000+ cases of whooping cough in California in 2014 and  
            the more recent measles outbreak. Children NOW states the  
            social and direct economic costs of ensuring each child  
            receives the CDC Advisory Committee for Immunization  
            Practices' recommended schedule of vaccines far outweighs the  
            costs of not providing routine immunizations, as it is  
            estimated that for every $1 spent on immunizations, as much as  
            $29 can be saved in direct and indirect costs. Children NOW  
            concludes this bill is similar to successful programs in other  
            states to improve quality (in New York, Louisiana, and Maine),  
            and would improve preventive care delivery for California  








          AB 1117 (Cristina Garcia)                         Page 8 of ?
          
          
            children enrolled in Medi-Cal.


          7)Policy Questions: 


             a)   What HEDIS measures should be used for  
               pay-for-performance? HEDIS is a standardized set of  
               performance measures used to provide health care  
               purchasers, consumers, and others with a reliable  
               comparison among health plans. The author indicates  
               childhood immunizations should be the basis for reward  
               payments because (1) childhood immunization is an area that  
               has been consistently identified for improvement based on  
               analysis of quality/HEDIS data by DHCS; (2) the low  
               childhood immunization rates are an underlying risk and  
               liability to the public health of the state, as experienced  
               by recent measles and whooping cough outbreaks; and (3)  
               incentives to better deliver childhood immunizations create  
               a motivation for health plans and providers and result in  
               better value for state health care dollars expended.


             There is considerable variation in health plan performance on  
               a variety of HEDIS measures, and more variation on some  
               measures than there currently is for 2 year old vaccination  
               rates (the variation for child vaccination rates is 87.91%  
               to 54.6%). For example, weight assessment and counseling  
               for physical activity for children/adolescents varies from  
               94.11% to 30.41%, adolescent vaccinations vary from 89% to  
               51.46%, and medication management compliance for people  
               with asthma varies from 79.80% to 31.72%. If DHCS is going  
               to implement pay-for-performance in Medi-Cal managed care,  
               should immunization rates for children under age 2 be the  
               measure chosen? Should only one of the multiple HEDIS  
               performance measures be used in pay-for-performance?


             b)   Incentive payment amount. The incentive payment under  
               this bill is $125 for each enrollee who receives all  
               recommended vaccinations by the time he or she reaches age  
               two. The author's office indicates this reward amount was  
               arrived at based on experiences in other states proven to  
               change provider and plan behavior. The author indicated  
               they mocked up different amounts, and $125 was the amount  








          AB 1117 (Cristina Garcia)                         Page 9 of ?
          
          
               that rewarded plans with better vaccination rates. To  
               provide a reward that is likely to change behavior, plans  
               and providers have to be paid more than they are currently.  
               However, the $125 amount is more than the monthly rate  
               plans are paid to cover children in Medi-Cal (referred to  
               as the "child only" rate). Is $125 the appropriate  
               incentive payment amount?



             c)   Can nongovernmental entities make voluntary  
               contributions to draw down federal Medicaid matching funds?  
               This bill authorizes the CCIQIF program to be financed  
               through voluntary contributions from Medi-Cal managed care  
               plans, which are required to be used to draw down FFP  
               consistent with federal law. Non-public voluntary  
               contributions can be matched with federal Medicaid funds  
               only to the extent that such contributions are considered  
               "bona fide provider-related donations." Contributions from  
               Medi-Cal managed care plans would be considered  
               provider-related. However, a donation is not considered  
               bona fide when it involves a hold harmless provision or  
               practice under which donations are returned in full or in  
               part to the provider. Donations occurring under these  
               conditions will not be approved by CMS for federal matching  
               funds. It is not clear if provider donations made by plans  
               under this bill would be eligible for FFP or if the  
               programs implemented in other states have relied on a  
               similar financing mechanism.

           SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION  :
          Support:  Children Now (sponsor)
                    American Academy of Pediatrics, California
                    American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
                    Employees, AFL-CIO
                    California Academy of Family Physicians 
                    California Children's Hospital Association
                    California Coverage and Health Initiatives
                    California Medical Association
                    California Pan-Ethnic Health Network
                    Children's Defense Fund California
                    Children's Specialty Care Coalition
                    Family Voices of California
                    First 5 Alameda County
                    First 5 Association of California








          AB 1117 (Cristina Garcia)                         Page 10 of ?
          
          
                    First 5 Santa Cruz County
                    Los Angeles Trust for Children's Health
                    March of Dimes California Chapter
                    St. John's Well Child and Family Center
                    The Children's Partnership
                    United Ways of California
                    Vision y Compromiso

          Oppose:   None received

          
                                      -- END --