AB 1118, as amended, Bonta. Police officer standards and training: procedural justice.
Existing law establishes the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, to adopt rules establishing minimum standards relating to physical, mental, and moral fitness that govern the recruitment of specified peace officers. Existing law requires the commission to establish a certification program for those officers.
begin insertExisting law establishes the Board of State and Community Corrections to collect and maintain available information and data about state and community correctional policies, practices, capacities, and needs, as specified.
end insertThis bill wouldbegin delete require every city police officer or deputy sheriff at a supervisory level or below who is assigned field or investigative duties to complete a procedural justice training course certified by the commission within 18 months after the commission determines that the training curriculum is sufficient. The bill would require the training to address specified objectives and core principles, and would require the commission to periodically update the training course and establish retraining schedule to incorporate
updated course content.end deletebegin insert establish the Procedural Justice Task Force, which would be administered by the board. The task force would provide for grant funding, to be awarded to local law enforcement departments for the purpose of implementing and enhancing procedural justice training, as well as a matching grant program to award funds invested by philanthropic organizations. This bill would require the task force to manage these programs, monitor their implementation, and serve in an advisory capacity to sites leading implementation. The bill would set forth additional powers and authority relating to the operation of the task force.end insert
The task force would be composed of 12 members, including the Attorney General, or his or her designee, the chair of the board, representatives of law enforcement, nonprofit civil rights organizations, and academia, as prescribed. The bill would specify the minimum requirements for a procedural justice training program of a local law enforcement agency applying for a grant. It would require the commission to develop a model procedural justice training curriculum, within an unspecified period.
end insertVote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) Procedural justice and police legitimacy training builds the
4public’s confidence in police departments, acceptance of police
5authority, and the belief that officers are fair, based on the
6application of the following four key principles:
7(1) Treating people with dignity and respect.
end insertbegin insert
8(2) Making decisions fairly, based on facts, not illegitimate
9factors such as race.
10(3) Giving people a voice - a chance to tell their side of the
11story.
12(4) Acting in a way that encourages community members to
13believe that they will be treated with goodwill in the future.
14(b) Law enforcement departments that employ such
15principles - supported by a wealth of research - experience higher
16levels of public cooperation with police efforts to address crime,
17increased compliance with the law, stronger public support for
P3 1police, and greater deference to police in interactions with
2community members.
3(c) Procedural justice and police legitimacy university experts
4have developed a proven curriculum that draws on research in
5legitimacy, procedural justice, leadership and adult learning
6theory, and has been successfully implemented in cities throughout
7the nation, including in Chicago, Oakland, Stockton, and Salinas.
8(d) The City of Oakland has advanced the field of procedural
9justice and police legitimacy by having community partners lead
10modules on the intersection of race and policing, including the
11historical and generational effects of policing, and community
12perspectives on policing.
13(e) The community training partnership was well received by
14police officers in Oakland, who actively engage with the community
15trainers, and fostered a set of community leaders that act as critical
16champions who, for example, serve as bridges to the community
17while continuing to press for institutional change.
18(f) The cities of Oakland,
Salinas, and Stockton are all
19considering ongoing procedural justice and police legitimacy
20training, including a combination of scenario-based training and
21advanced procedural justice training tailored to particular
22situations or roles in a department.
23(g) Several police departments that have implemented
24procedural justice and police legitimacy training are planning on
25incorporating content on implicit racial bias into future training.
26(h) In Oakland and Stockton, the departments’ embrace of
27procedural justice principles has provided a set of unifying values
28and guiding principles that a group of diverse partners regularly
29invoke as they implement evidence-based
violence reduction
30strategies.
Section 13515.56 is added to the Penal Code, to read:
(a) The Legislature finds and declaresbegin insert all ofend insert the
34following:
35(1) Police training that addresses culture, diversity, mental
36illness, youth development, and emphasizes mediation skills,
37improves how police relate to the communities that they serve and
38help minimize the use of force. The Legislature acknowledges that
39procedural justice training has emerged as a best practice for police
40departments to build trust with community members and reduce
P4 1confrontation. Research suggests that when citizens see the police
2as more objective, they are more likely to comply with police
3directives.
4(2) Procedural justice emphasizes treating community residents
5with respect, and has gained traction as an evidence-based and
6cost-effective way to reduce crime. As a result, several law
7enforcement agencies throughout the country have implemented
8procedural justice training into their academies along with field
9training. Procedural justice is based on the following core
10principles:
11(A) Fairness and consistency of rule application.
12(B) Impartiality and unbiased decisionmaker neutrality.
13(C) Citizen voice in decisionmaking.
14(D) Transparency and openness in process.
15(3) Police training programs should include content for
16mitigating
the impact of bias, identifying and properly responding
17to people with mental illness, and instill the principles and practices
18of procedural justice.
19(b) Every city police officer or deputy sheriff at a supervisory
20level or below who is assigned field or investigative duties shall
21complete a procedural justice training course certified by the
22commission, within 18 months after the commission determines
23that the training curriculum is sufficient to satisfy the requirements
24of this section. This training shall be offered to all city police
25officers and deputy sheriffs as part of continuing professional
26training. The training shall address, at a minimum, the objectives
27and core principles described in paragraphs (2) and (3) of
28subdivision (a).
29(c) The commission shall periodically update the procedural
30justice training course required under this section, and shall
31establish a retraining schedule to incorporate the updated course
32content.
33(b) (1) The Procedural Justice Task Force is hereby created
34and shall be administered by the Board of State and Community
35Corrections. The purpose of the task force is to do both of the
36following:
37(A) To provide for grant funding, to be awarded to local law
38enforcement departments for the purpose of implementing and
39enhancing procedural justice training.
P5 1(B) To provide for a matching grant program, whereby
2philanthropic organizations may invest directly in procedural
3justice training.
4(2) The task force shall manage the grant programs, monitor
5implementation, and serve in an advisory capacity to sites leading
6implementation.
7(3) The task force shall bring together police departments that
8are implementing procedural justice training, as well as support
9the implementation and monitor the effectiveness of a community
10of practice plan to assist police departments that have adopted
11procedural justice training.
12(c) The task force shall have the powers and authority necessary
13to carry out the duties imposed upon it by this section, including,
14but not limited to, all of the following:
15(1) To employ any administrative, technical, or other
personnel
16necessary for the performance of its powers and duties.
17(2) To hold hearings, make and sign any agreements, and to do
18or perform any acts that may be necessary, desirable, or proper
19to carry out the purposes of this section.
20(3) To cooperate with, and secure the cooperation of, any
21department, division, board, bureau, commission, or other agency
22of the state to facilitate the task force properly to carry out its
23powers and duties.
24(4) To appoint advisers or advisory committees from time to
25time when the task force determines that the experience or expertise
26of the advisers or advisory committees is needed for projects of
27the task force. Section 11009 of the Government Code shall apply
28to these advisers or advisory committees.
29(5) To accept any
federal funds granted, by act of Congress or
30by executive order, for all or any of the purposes of this section.
31(6) To accept any gift, donation, grant, or bequest for all or any
32of the purposes of this section.
33(d) The task force shall be composed of 12 members. The
34members shall elect one member to chair the task force. The
35members of the task force shall include individuals representing
36a cross-section of disciplines and entities, as follows:
37(1) The Attorney General, or his or her designee.
end insertbegin insert
38(2) The President of the Peace Officers Research Association
39of California, or his or her designee.
P6 1(3) The President of the California Police Chiefs Association,
2or his or her designee.
3(4) The President of the California State Sheriffs’ Association,
4or his or her designee.
5(5) The Executive Director of the Commission on Peace Officers
6Standards and Training, or his or her designee.
7(6) The Chair of the Board of State and Community Corrections,
8or his or her designee.
9(7) Two representatives from each of the following categories,
10one of whom shall be appointed by the President Pro Tempore of
11the Senate and one of whom shall be appointed by the Speaker of
12the Assembly:
13(A) A university researcher or professor who specializes in
14procedural justice, community-police relations,
implicit bias, or
15a similar law enforcement subject.
16(B) A representative of a nonprofit civil rights organization that
17specializes in civil or human rights and criminal justice.
18(C) A community organizer who specializes in civil or human
19rights and criminal justice.
20(e) The task force shall award grants to local law enforcement
21agency applicants with a procedural justice training program that
22meets, at a minimum, the following requirements:
23(1) Establishes authentic partnerships with community-based
24organizations, incorporates community partners in leading a
25portion of the training and development of local law enforcement
26policies and practices.
27(2) Apportions funding for community
partners to facilitate
28training modules.
29(3) Addresses implicit bias.
end insertbegin insert
30(4) Includes a contextualized module that addresses the
31historical and generational effects of policing with particular
32emphasis on communities of color.
33(5) Is implemented in multiple phases, including in the academy,
34field training, and as ongoing standalone training, particularly
35for mid-level officers and captains.
36(6) Includes performance reviews to test police officers’
37competency in procedural justice, including evaluations from
38supervising officers, peer evaluations, and community surveys.
P7 1(7) Includes the development of tools to continuously assess
2course quality and determine whether the training is changing
3
officers’ attitudes and practices.
4(8) Is tailored or customized to reflect community priorities and
5departmental needs.
6(f) In consultation with the task force, the commission shall
7develop a model procedural justice training curriculum, no later
8than____. The task force and commission shall work together to
9determine the appropriate length and content of the course.
O
97