BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1124 Page 1 (Without Reference to File) CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 1124 (Perea) As Amended September 4, 2015 Majority vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: | 79-0 | (June 3, |SENATE: | |(September 11, | | | |2015) | | |2015) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- (vote not available) Original Committee Reference: INS. SUMMARY: Requires the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers Compensation (administrative director) to adopt a prescription drug formulary for workers compensation benefits by July 1, 2017. The Senate amendments: AB 1124 Page 2 1)Declare legislative intent that the formulary adopted by the administrative director include the following: a) Guidance for access to pain medications. b) Guidance for the off-label use of prescription drugs. c) Use of generic medications. d) Brand name medications when those medications are cost-effective. e) Exemptions for medication provided in a hospital or emergency room. f) Guidance on the efficient use of the formulary. 2)Require that the formulary be phased in for existing patients. 3)Require the administrative director to consult with stakeholders prior to adopting a formulary. 4)Require the administrative director to update the formulary on a quarterly basis. 5)Exempt changes to the formulary from the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act. 6)Require the administrative director to establish a pharmacy and therapeutics committee (committee) and consult with the committee on formulary updates. AB 1124 Page 3 7)Specify the composition of the committee and establishes conflict of interest and confidentiality requirements for committee members. EXISTING LAW: 1)Requires employers to provide medical treatment to an injured worker that is reasonably required to cure or relieve an injury that occurs on the job. 2)Requires the Administrative Director to adopt a medical treatment utilization schedule (MTUS) that addresses the frequency, duration, intensity, and appropriateness of all treatment procedures and modalities commonly performed in workers compensation cases. 3)Provides that the MTUS is presumptively correct on the extent and scope of treatment for workers' compensation patients. This presumption is rebuttable by proving with a preponderance of the evidence that a treatment is reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured worker. 4)Requires pharmacies to dispense generic drug equivalents for workers' compensation patients unless the prescriber expressly prohibits it. 5)Requires the employer to establish a utilization review process that is to be used when the employer seeks to modify, delay, or deny a request for treatment. AB 1124 Page 4 6)Requires that disputed utilization review determinations be resolved by independent medical review. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, Department of Industrial Relations estimates that, under the August 17th version of the bill, it would incur annual costs in the range of $1 million to $1.1 million (special funds) to implement its provisions. As amended, the bill would likely have a similar fiscal impact. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. According to the author, this bill gives the Administrative Director clear authority to establish a formulary. An effective formulary will control rising prescription drug costs in California's workers' compensation system, limit the over-prescribing of highly-addictive opioids, and ensure injured workers get the necessary treatment needed to get back to work. 2)Formularies. Drug formularies have proven to be very effective at managing the cost of prescription drugs. Health plans have been using formularies in California for decades and they are commonly accepted as a useful cost control mechanism. They control costs by limiting the utilization of high priced drugs and reducing the price of drugs. Formularies are usually developed by companies known as pharmaceutical benefits managers (PBMs) who design formularies and manage prescription drug benefits for a contracting health plan. At the most basic level a formulary is a list of drugs that a health plan or insurer agrees to cover. However, formularies are not simply arbitrary limits on drug use. Formularies must be broad enough to provide drug treatment options when they are available, and formulary decisions are guided substantially by the scientific evidence regarding individual drugs. However, in most cases there are multiple drugs available to treat a given condition and formularies are constructed to drive treatment choices to the most cost-effective option. AB 1124 Page 5 Formularies use a number of strategies to control costs driven by utilization including: a) Quantity Restrictions - formularies commonly prohibit dispensing a greater quantity of the drug than is typically necessary. Antibiotics and opioids are examples of drug categories where there have been historical patterns of overprescribing and abuse that can be addressed by quantity restrictions. b) Refill Restrictions - formularies commonly will not allow a prescription to be refilled until the period of time that the initial prescription was expected to last has elapsed. c) Use of Generics - formularies commonly will not include a name brand drug if there is a generic version of that drug available. Generic drugs are chemically identical to a name brand drug but typically are available at dramatically lower prices. d) Category Restrictions - formularies can also exclude some categories of drugs entirely, generally because there are drugs in other categories that are more effective. e) Prior Authorization - formularies also commonly impose prior authorization requirements on certain drugs because of the high cost of the drug or because some drugs have common non-therapeutic uses. Drugs requiring prior authorization are covered by the formulary, but only after the prescriber has established a medical need for the drug. Prior authorization is commonly used for expensive biotech drugs prescribed for serious conditions and for drugs that have common cosmetic or recreational uses. AB 1124 Page 6 f) Step-therapy - formularies commonly require that a prescriber begin therapy with the lowest cost drug in a category and demonstrate the drug failed to remediate the problem before prescribing higher cost drugs in the category. In many categories there are less expensive (generally older) but comparable drugs available and step-therapy requirements push treatment to these drugs but allow for a more expensive (generally newer) drug if the cheaper drug doesn't work for the individual patient. g) Co-Payments - formularies outside of workers compensation almost always include a patient "co-payment" for each prescription. In the mainstream world of health plans, a tiered structure of co-payments is commonly used where the lowest co-payment is for generic drugs, a higher co-payment is for the preferred branded drug, and non-preferred branded drugs are subject to a still higher co-payment. Typically these co-payment structures are steeply slanted to create financial incentives for patients to choose a generic or lower cost branded drugs over higher cost alternatives. This structure is also commonly referred to as an "open" formulary. Formularies are constructed to drive treatment to the most cost-effective options for treating the group of patients as a whole. However, formularies do generally include provisions for prescribing outside the formulary after the prescriber has established that the formulary restrictions are not appropriate for an individual patient. In addition to using these strategies designed to control the utilization of drugs, PBMs also use formulary construction to reduce the price of drugs. By aggregating the purchasing power of multiple health plans, a PBM can negotiate discounts from competing drug manufacturers. By making a particular drug in a category the preferred drug on the formulary, the PBM can increase the sales volume of that particular drug and many manufacturers are prepared to offer favorable pricing to secure the added volume of sales. The combination of AB 1124 Page 7 utilization controls and the exercise of market power to reduce pricing has been effective and made formularies a pillar of managed care. 3)Why A Formulary? Drug costs have been growing significantly in the workers compensation system in recent years (especially the cost of opioids which is discussed in greater detail below) and formularies have a proven track record of reducing drug costs in other states. As noted above, formularies work both by both restricting utilization of higher cost drugs and reducing the cost of drugs and present a logical alternative to restrain the increasing cost of drugs in the workers compensation system. This would be particularly true for workers' compensation as there is no financial incentive for prescribers or patients in the system to control drug utilization or to have cost factor into prescribing decisions. The absence of copayments in the workers' compensation system also means that the tiered copayment structure (what is also referred to as an open formulary) will be ineffective in the workers' compensation system. However, a closed formulary does not rely on the financial incentive of a copayment to influence drug utilization and would be required for any formulary to be effective in workers' compensation. 4)CWCI Study. The California Workers Compensation Institute (a highly regarded industry research organization) published a study in November of 2014 that evaluated the potential impact of adopting a workers compensation formulary in California. The study found that applying the workers compensation formularies adopted in Texas and Washington could reduce California workers' compensation payments for non-formulary drugs between $124 and $420 million per year. Both Texas and Washington adopted formularies in response to sustained, double-digit growth in their workers' compensation prescription drug costs. a) The Texas formulary was phased in beginning in September 2011, with initial implementation for new injuries and subsequent expansion to legacy claims. It had an immediate AB 1124 Page 8 impact. In the first year, non-formulary drug payments fell by 82% (from 17% to 4% of total drug expenditures) and the number of prescriptions fell 74%. b) Washington implemented its formulary in 2004, and it also had a significant effect on the utilization and cost of workers' compensation prescription drugs. A 2011 Workers' Compensation Research Institute (WCRI) study found average prescription payments per claim in Washington were significantly lower than the median cost in 17 other states. According to the WCRI, Washington has lower drug prices for several reasons, including: a pharmacy fee schedule; mandatory generic substitution; and a formulary, which mandated substitution of generic alternatives when no generic equivalents are available. The WCRI study also looked at prescription drug payments from California's workers compensation system and found that the California exceeded the average prescription payment per claim of the 17 other study states by 80%. 5)Opioids. CWCI has also produced a significant volume of research documenting the rapid escalation in the use (and associated cost) of opioids in workers' compensation. Opioids include powerful painkillers such as morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone, codeine, and hydrocodone. Opioid use has been rising nationwide and there is a well-documented problem with abuse of and addiction to these prescription painkillers, and workers' compensation patients are not excluded from this phenomenon. According to a recent CWCI report, The findings show that in the first half of 2013, Schedule II opioids, which include powerful narcotics such as oxycontin, fentanyl and morphine, have grown to 7.3 percent of California workers' compensation prescriptions - nearly 6 times the proportion noted in 2002. Over the same period, payments for these drugs have increased from 4.7 percent to 19.6 percent of California workers' compensation prescription dollars. The data also suggest that the use of Schedule II AB 1124 Page 9 drugs in workers' compensation may have stabilized near this record level, as over the most recent 3-1/2 years these drugs have accounted for between 6.5 and 7.3 percent of all prescriptions dispensed to injured workers, while over the most recent 4-1/2 years Schedule II drug payments have represented about 1 out of every 5 dollars paid for workers' compensation prescriptions in California. The findings also show that since 2002, less powerful Schedule III opioids - primarily Vicodin or other forms of hydrocodone compounded with a non-steroidal drugs such as acetaminophen - have accounted for a much more consistent share of workers' compensation prescription drugs, generally representing around 20 percent of all prescriptions dispensed to injured workers and 10 to 11 percent of the overall drug spend. A workers' compensation formulary would likely have a powerful impact on the spiraling use of opioids. The utilization control mechanisms such as quantity and refill restrictions, prior authorization requirements, and step therapy requirements are all likely to be very effective at weeding out cases with excessive opioid use and potential abuse. Pain medication is always going to be present at a meaningful level in occupational medicine given the nature of occupational injuries, but there is compelling evidence that there are far more workers on long term, high-dose opioid therapy than would is consistent with sound medical practice. In this area a formulary is likely to both reduce costs and improve the quality of care received by workers suffering from chronic pain. Analysis Prepared by: Paul Riches / INS. / (916) 319-2086 FN: 0002270 AB 1124 Page 10