BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1147 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 1147 (Maienschein) As Amended July 7, 2015 2/3 vote. Urgency -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: | 78-0 | (May 14, |SENATE: |39-0 | (July 13, 2015) | | | |2015) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: HEALTH SUMMARY: Creates a licensing category for pediatric day health and respite care facilities (PDHRCFs), including all the requirements and standards that such facilities must adhere to, and revises the definition of a pediatric day health and respite care facility, which is currently limited to children 21 years of age or younger, to also permit an individual who is 22 years of age or older to receive care if the facility receives approval for a Transitional Health Care Needs Optional Service Unit, which is established by this bill. Contains an urgency clause to ensure that the provisions of this bill go into immediate effect upon enactment. The Senate amendments clarify the Department of Public Health's (DPH) ability to ensure that PDHRCFs meets minimal standards prior licensure, and to deny the approval of the optional service unit if does not meet DPH standards. AB 1147 Page 2 FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs. COMMENTS: According to the author, medically fragile children, as they begin to approach the age of 22, have been faced with untenable choices of how to cobble together the types of services that could provide the same type of care and support received at PDHRCFs. Unfortunately, these services simply do not exist; and families are again facing similar unacceptable choices as they faced before PDHRCFs were established. The author states this bill will guarantee the continuity of care this population desperately needs by allowing medically fragile children and young adults to continue to receive the quality services from PDHRCFs as they grow older than the age of 22. AB 3413 (Polanco), Chapter, 1227, Statutes of 1990, added a new category of health facility: Pediatric Day Health and Respite Care Facility. Prior to that date, families with medically-fragile children had very few choices to find day health and respite care that would allow the child to remain at home, keep the family intact, and keep parents working. When this category of facility was first established, most of the medically-fragile children were not expected to survive to become adults; this model did not envision a system of care that would provide a seamless transition for these children as they age out of the PDHRCF programs. When enacted, AB 3413 required the Department of Health Services, now DPH, to adopt regulations by July 1, 1993, and allowed PDHRCFs to operate under a provisional license until the regulations were adopted by complying with the regulations for Congregate Living Health Facilities (CLHFs). At that time regulations for CLHFs were to be final by January 1, 1991, and CLHFs were operating under Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) regulations with some exceptions to those regulations allowed through program flexibility waivers. AB 1147 Page 3 Neither the CLHF, nor the PDHRCF regulations were ever adopted and both types of facilities have had to be licensed and operate under SNF requirements and regulations, with some exemptions as granted by DPH. PDHRCFs are very different than SNFs. SNFs are long term care facilities whose adult residents are receiving 24-hour inpatient care. PDHRCFs are daycare centers that offer occasional over-night respite care to clients' and their families. PDHRCFs have found it challenging over the years to meet the requirements of SNF licensure. For example, an SNF will have a pharmacist on staff who orders medications for the residents. A PDHRCF may administer medication to a client, but does not have a pharmacist, and is simply checking the medications each day as they are brought to the facility by the parent or guardian. Yet under current licensure requirements, both facilities must have a pharmaceutical service committee with a pharmacist member. Together We Grow, a PDHRCF in San Diego is the sponsor of this bill and states, unlike the care provided by PDHRCFs, long-term care for medically-fragile young adults is fragmented and does not provide the same essential choices to medically-fragile adults and their families. The sponsors note that current state licensing law permits children to receive care up until the child turns 22 years of age, and then they and their families are faced with the possibility of institutionalization (leaving their families), attending an adult day health care center that does not have the level of expertise, programming, or activities necessary to engage and provide safe care for this population, foregoing any family respite support, or forcing family members to quit their jobs to provide care to their loved ones. Together We Grow concludes that this bill will permit medically fragile young adults to remain at the PDHRCF in a separate transitional care unit, and that the costs of these services are less than the state would pay for institutional care. The California Children's Hospital Association (CCHA) supports this bill pointing out that as a result of the advances made in medicine over the past 25 years; more medically fragile children are living into adulthood and aging out of PDHRCF service. CCHA notes that this can be disastrous for patients and families, AB 1147 Page 4 both financially and emotionally, as they enter a fragmented adult system that does not have the same level of services. CCHA concludes that this bill will protect their access to the facilities they have essentially grown up in, while ensuring they are being cared for in a transitional unit appropriate to their age. There is no known opposition to this bill. Analysis Prepared by: Lara Flynn / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN: 0001203