BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1163 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 1163 (Rodriguez) As Amended May 12, 2015 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+------+----------------------+--------------------| |Health |17-0 |Bonta, Maienschein, | | | | |Bonilla, Burke, | | | | |Chávez, Chiu, Gomez, | | | | |Gonzalez, Lackey, | | | | |Nazarian, Patterson, | | | | |Ridley-Thomas, | | | | |Rodriguez, Santiago, | | | | |Thurmond, Waldron, | | | | |Wood | | | | | | | |----------------+------+----------------------+--------------------| |Insurance |12-0 |Daly, Beth Gaines, | | | | |Travis Allen, | | | | |Calderon, Cooley, | | | | |Cooper, Dababneh, | | | | |Frazier, Gatto, | | | | |Gonzalez, Mayes, | | | | |Rodriguez | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------- AB 1163 Page 2 SUMMARY: Prohibits a health care service plan (plan) or health insurer (insurer) from making material changes to contracts with insurance agents or brokers without providing at least 60 days of notice. Specifically, this bill: 1)Prohibits a material change made by a plan or insurer to the terms and conditions of a contract with an agent or broker from becoming effective until the plan or insurer has provided at least 60 days of written or electronic notice indicating the change to the contract. 2)Defines a "material change" as a change made to a provision of the contract affecting commissions, bonuses, incentive payments, right of survivorship, indemnification by the plan or insurer, and errors and omissions coverage requirements. 3)Specifies that the notice requirement shall not apply if the change to the contract is mutually agreed upon by the plan or insurer and the agent or broker, or if the change is required by state or federal law. 4)Provides that violations of these provisions by a plan are exempt from disciplinary and criminal offense provisions in existing law. FISCAL EFFECT: None COMMENTS: According to the author, this bill responds to recent actions by a health insurance carrier that made substantial material changes to its contract with agents, providing only 48 hours' notice before those changes took effect. The author states that this bill will prevent this from occurring by requiring plans and insurers to provide their appointed agents with 60 days AB 1163 Page 3 advance notice of any material changes in their contracts. The author states that this bill would require a delay of implementation of any substantive change made to a contract by a plan or insurer until proper notice is given to the agent. Background. Contracts between agents and brokers and insurance carriers set forth the terms and conditions of their business relationship, and contain provisions regarding compensation, required levels of client service, reporting requirements, and other provisions. These contracts generally contain provisions outlining how changes to the contract may be made, and when they take effect. However, there is no standard contract required, and contract provisions vary among insurance carriers. Plans and insurers set aside a portion of the premium to pay licensed agents a commission that generally covers the selling of the plan or insurance policy, as well as ongoing servicing. Contracts between agents and plans and insurers contain a commission schedule outlining the amount of commissions an agent will be paid, the timing of payment of commissions, and other provisions. Plans and insurers sometimes use commissions to drive agents to sell certain products by increasing commissions for products they wish to aggressively market. Conversely, they may lower commissions to deter agents from selling certain products. Changes to commissions may impact agents, not only in the amount of ongoing compensation for a certain product, but also in terms of time and resources invested in selling and servicing a product. For example, agents may spend days or weeks working up a policy for a client based on the assumption of a certain commission. For larger clients, such as large employers, it may take a team of agents to work up a policy, and agents may make investments in additional staff to provide ongoing servicing of a policy after it is sold. According to the California Association of Health Underwriters (CAHU), if the commission rate for a certain product AB 1163 Page 4 is changed, agents may need time to lay out other options for the client to consider or select. Support. CAHU, Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers Association of California, and the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, the sponsors of this bill, state that not only does this bill respond to recent actions by a health insurance carrier that made material changes to a contract with only 48 hours' notice, it also levels the playing field and provides fair and reasonable notice to licensed agents when their contract is substantially changed. The sponsors state that most contracts contain provisions that address how and when notice of changes to the contract can be implemented, however, many contracts contain separate clauses that allow carriers to make substantial changes to the agreement without any notice at all. The sponsors state that agents understand that business needs can sometimes drive a need for a material change, and this bill ensures that a change desired by the carrier can take effect as soon as proper notice is given. Opposition. The Association of California Life and Health Insurance Companies (ACLHIC) and the California Association of Health Plans (CAHP) oppose this bill, stating that it would unnecessarily interfere with private party contracts and seeks to offer a legislative remedy to an issue better handled through the course of contractual negotiations and agreements. ACLHIC and CAHP state that this bill usurps current contract negotiation practices which already have self-imposed time frames and notification agreements, and where violations are treated as a breach of contract. Opponents argues that a vast majority of their member companies currently have a 30-day notification agreement built into their existing contract frameworks and deviation from that would result in significant expense and confusion. AB 1163 Page 5 Analysis Prepared by: Kelly Green / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097 FN: 0000375