AB 1164,
as amended, Gatto. begin deleteState highways: evaluation and rating. end deletebegin insertWater conservation: drought tolerant landscaping.end insert
Existing law generally authorizes every city and county, including a charter city, in this state to make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations that are not in conflict with general laws.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would prohibit a city, including a charter city, county, and city and county, from enacting or enforcing any ordinance or regulation that prohibits the installation of synthetic grass or artificial turf on residential property. The bill would additionally state that this is an issue of statewide concern.
end insertbegin insertThe bill would continuously appropriate $300,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Water Resources Control Board in equal amounts of $100,000,000 for each of the 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 fiscal years, to provide matching funds to specified local agencies to provide incentives to residents to replace water inefficient landscaping with drought tolerant landscaping.
end insertbegin insertThe bill would state the intent of the Legislature to streamline the installation of infrastructure that collects graywater for the purposes of recycling water to be used for nonpotable uses.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
end insertExisting law gives the Department of Transportation full possession and control of the state highways. Existing law requires the department to prepare a state highway operation and protection program for the expenditure of transportation funds for major capital improvements that are necessary to preserve and protect the state highway system.
end deleteThis bill would require the department, in consultation with specified entities, to conduct an annual evaluation and rating of the overall quality of the state highway system and the resources needed to provide a system in good repair, and would require a report to specified committees of the Legislature in that regard annually until 2020. The bill would also require the department to post the report on its Internet Web site.
end deleteVote: begin deletemajority end deletebegin insert2⁄3end insert.
Appropriation: begin deleteno end deletebegin insertyesend insert.
Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature hereby finds and declares:
end insertbegin insert
2(a) With the lowest snowpack ever recorded, California finds
3itself in 2015 in the fourth year of a historic, prolonged, and
4potentially devastating drought.
5(b) Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. issued an Executive order
6on April 1, 2015, which, for the first time in California history,
7directs the State Water Resources Control Board to implement
8mandatory water reductions across the state to reduce water usage
9by 25 percent.
10(c) One component of the Governor’s Executive order compels
11the replacement of 50 million square feet of lawns throughout the
12state with drought tolerant landscaping.
13(d) Among a wide variety of drought tolerant landscaping are
14a variety of native plants and landscaping alternatives, including
15the installation of synthetic grass or artificial turf.
P3 1(e) According to the Department of Water Resources, landscape
2irrigation represents 43 percent of urban water use. The
3installation of synthetic grass or artificial turf, in lieu of
4conventional lawns and landscapes, can directly reduce outdoor
5water use to help meet the Governor’s mandated 25-percent
6statewide water use reduction.
7(f) The vast majority of Californians may today elect to install
8synthetic grass
or artificial turf in their single-family residential
9landscapes.
It is the intent of the Legislature to streamline the
11installation of infrastructure that collects graywater for the
12purposes of recycling water to be used for nonpotable uses.
begin insertSection 53087.7 is added to the end insertbegin insertGovernment Codeend insertbegin insert, to
14read:end insert
A city, including a charter city, county, or city and
16county, shall not enact any ordinance or regulation, or enforce
17any existing ordinance or regulation, that prohibits the installation
18of synthetic grass or artificial turf on residential property.
The Legislature finds and declares the prolonged
20drought, along with climate change, requires the state to address
21water conservation goals that will have long-term impacts in this
22state. The Legislature further finds and declares that drought
23tolerant landscaping, including the installation of synthetic grass
24or artificial turf, is a viable landscaping alternative that will further
25the goal of addressing long-term water conservation. Therefore,
26allowing property owners in this state to install synthetic grass or
27artificial turf on their residential properties is a matter of statewide
28concern, not a municipal
affair as that term is used in Section 5
29of Article XI of the California Constitution.
Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government
31Code, the sum of three hundred million dollars ($300,000,000) is
32hereby continuously appropriated from the General Fund to the
33State Water Resources Control Board to be expended in equal
34shares of one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) for each of
35the 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 fiscal years to provide
36matching funds to any city, county, city and county, public water
37agency, or private water agency to provide incentives to residents
38to replace water inefficient landscaping with drought tolerant
39landscaping.
This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
2immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
3the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
4immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
5In order to address the historic, prolonged, and potentially
6devastating drought, it is necessary that residents of this state be
7able to replace water inefficient landscaping with drought tolerant
8landscaping as quickly as possible; therefore, it is necessary that
9this act take effect immediately.
Section 14526.7 is added to the Government
11Code, to read:
(a) The department shall conduct an annual evaluation
13and rating of the overall quality of the state highway system and
14the resources needed to
provide a system in good repair. The
15
evaluation shall demonstrate how resource, staffing, and
16programming decisions impact the overall condition of the state
17highway system. The evaluation shall address the number of
18distressed lane miles, bridge conditions, and life cycle costs. The
19evaluation shall also include, but not be limited to, all of the
20following:
21(1) The rating of the state’s urban interstate lane miles, measured
22according to the International Roughness Index, and the schedule
23and resources needed to bring at least 90 percent of the lane miles
24
rated less than 170 (the federal rating of poor condition) into good
25condition.
26(2) The rating of the state’s rural interstate lane miles, measured
27according to the International Roughness Index, and the schedule
28and resources needed to bring at least 95 percent of the lane miles
29rated less than 170 (the federal rating of poor condition) into good
30condition.
31(3) The percentage of lane miles on the state freeways and
32highways that are distressed lane miles and the schedule and
33resources needed to bring the percentage of distressed lane miles
34to 5 percent or less.
35(4) The schedule and resources needed to bring the pavement
36level of service to the well-maintained pavement level for 95
37percent or more of the lane miles on the state freeways and
38highways.
39(5) The percentage of the state’s bridges that achieve a bridge
40health index (BHI) rating of at least 94, the percentage of bridges
P5 1with a BHI
rating of 80 or lower, and the schedule and resources
2needed to perform bridge maintenance and capital repairs to ensure
3that all of the state’s bridges achieve a BHI rating of at least 94.
4(6) The number of the state’s bridges that are structurally
5deficient or functionally obsolete under federal standards and the
6schedule and resources needed to ensure that no more than 10
7percent of the state’s bridges are structurally deficient or
8functionally obsolete.
9(b) In
conducting the evaluation specified in subdivision (a),
10the department shall consult with the following:
11(1) The commission.
12(2) Regional transportation agencies.
13(3) County transportation agencies.
14(c) The department shall provide the evaluation and rating
15specified in subdivision (a) in an annual report, on or before March
1631, to the Assembly Committee on Transportation and the Senate
17Committee on Transportation and Housing. The report shall also
18be posted on the department’s Internet Web site.
19(d) The requirement for submitting a report imposed under
20subdivision (c) is inoperative after March 31, 2020, pursuant to
21Section 10231.5.
O
96