AB 1164, as amended, Gatto. Water conservation: drought tolerant landscaping.
Existing law generally authorizes every city and county, including a charter city, in this state to make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations that are not in conflict with general laws.
This bill would prohibit a city, including a charter city, county, and city and county, from enacting or enforcing any ordinance or regulation that prohibits the installation of synthetic grass or artificial turf on residentialbegin delete propertyend deletebegin insert property, as specifiedend insert. The bill would additionally state that this is an issue of statewide concern.
The bill would continuously appropriate $300,000,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Water Resources in equal amounts of $100,000,000 for each of the 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 fiscal years, to provide matching funds to specified local agencies to provide incentives to residents to replace water inefficient landscaping with drought tolerant landscaping.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Vote: 2⁄3. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature hereby finds and declares:
2(a) With the lowest snowpack ever recorded, California finds
3itself in 2015 in the fourth year of a historic, prolonged, and
4potentially devastating drought.
5(b) Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. issued an Executive order
6on April 1, 2015, which, for the first time in California history,
7directs the State Water Resources Control Board to implement
8mandatory water reductions across the state to reduce water usage
9by 25 percent.
10(c) One component of the Governor’s Executive order compels
11the
replacement of 50 million square feet of lawns throughout the
12state with drought tolerant landscaping.
13(d) Among a wide variety of drought tolerant landscaping are
14a variety of native plants and landscaping alternatives, including
15the installation of synthetic grass or artificial turf.
16(e) According to the Department of Water Resources, landscape
17irrigation represents 43 percent of urban water use. The installation
18of synthetic grass or artificial turf, in lieu of conventional lawns
19and landscapes, can directly reduce outdoor water use to help meet
20the Governor’s mandated 25-percent statewide water use reduction.
21(f) The vast majority of Californians may today elect to install
22synthetic grass or artificial turf in their
single-family residential
23landscapes.
Section 53087.7 is added to the Government Code, to
25read:
begin insert(a)end insertbegin insert end insertA city, including a charter city, county, or city
2and county, shall not enact any ordinance or regulation, or enforce
3any existing ordinance or regulation, that prohibits the installation
4of synthetic grass or artificial turf on residential property.
5(b) A city, including a charter city, county, or city and county,
6may impose reasonable restrictions on the type of synthetic grass
7or artificial turf that may be installed on residential property
8provided that those restrictions do not do either of the following:
9(1) Substantially increase the cost of installing synthetic grass
10or artificial turf.
11(2) Effectively prohibit the installation of synthetic grass or
12artificial turf.
The Legislature finds and declares the prolonged
14drought, along with climate change, requires the state to address
15water conservation goals that will have long-term impacts in this
16state. The Legislature further finds and declares that drought
17tolerant landscaping, including the installation of synthetic grass
18or artificial turf, is a viable landscaping alternative that will further
19the goal of addressing long-term water conservation. Therefore,
20allowing property owners in this state to install synthetic grass or
21artificial turf on their residential properties is a matter of statewide
22concern, not a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of
23Article XI of the California Constitution.
Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government
25Code, the sum of three hundred million dollars ($300,000,000) is
26hereby continuously appropriated from the General Fund to the
27Department of Water Resources to be expended in equal shares
28of one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) for each of the
292015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 fiscal years to provide matching
30funds to any city, county, city and county, public water agency,
31or private water agency to provide incentives to residents to replace
32water inefficient landscaping with drought tolerant landscaping.
This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
34immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within
35the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into
36immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are:
37In order to address the historic, prolonged, and potentially
38devastating drought, it is necessary that residents of this state be
39able to replace water inefficient landscaping with drought tolerant
P4 1landscaping as quickly as possible; therefore, it is necessary that
2this act take effect immediately.
O
94