BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1164


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  April 27, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION


                                 Jim Frazier, Chair


          AB 1164  
          (Gatto) - As Amended April 21, 2015


          SUBJECT:  State highways:  performance measures


          SUMMARY:  Requires the California Department of Transportation  
          (Caltrans) to conduct an annual evaluation and rating of the  
          quality of the state highway system, using specified  
          measurements, and to report on its findings.  Specifically, this  
          bill:  





          1)Requires Caltrans to conduct an annual evaluation and rating  
            of the overall quality of the state highway system and the  
            resources needed to provide a system in good repair.



          2)Requires the evaluation to demonstrate how resource, staffing,  
            and programming decisions impact the overall condition of the  
            state highway system.  



          3)Requires the evaluation to address the number of distressed  








                                                                    AB 1164


                                                                    Page  2





            lane miles, bridge conditions, and life cycle costs and to  
            also include the following:



             a)   The rating of the state's urban interstate lane miles,  
               measured according to the International Roughness Index  
               (IRI), and the schedule and resources needed to bring at  
               least 90% of the lane miles rated in poor condition into  
               good condition;



             b)   The rating of the state's rural interstate lane miles,  
               also measured according to the IRI, and the schedule and  
               resources needed to bring at least 95% of the lane miles  
               rated in poor condition into good condition.



             c)   The percentage of lane miles on the state freeways and  
               highways that are distressed lane miles and the schedule  
               and resources needed to bring the percentage of distressed  
               lane miles to 5% or less.



             d)   The schedule and resources needed to bring the pavement  
               level of service to the well-maintained pavement level for  
               95% or more of the lanes miles on the state highway system.



             e)   The percentage of the state's bridges with a bridge  
               health index (BHI) rating of at least 94, the percentage of  
               bridges with a BHI of 80 or lower, and the schedule and  
               resources needed to perform bridge maintenance and capital  
               repairs to ensure that all of the state's bridges achieve a  
               BHI rating of at least 94.








                                                                    AB 1164


                                                                    Page  3








             f)   The number of the state's bridges that are structurally  
               deficient or functionally obsolete under federal standards  
               and the schedule and resources needed to ensure that no  
               more than 10% of the state's bridges are structurally  
               deficient or functionally obsolete.



          4)Requires Caltrans to consult with other specified entities in  
            conducting the evaluation.  



          5)Requires Caltrans, until March 31, 2020, to submit annual  
            reports to the Legislature regarding its evaluation and  
            rating.  



          EXISTING LAW:  


          1)Grants Caltrans broad authority related to control of state  
            highways.



          2)Directs Caltrans to improve and maintain the state highways.



          3)Requires Caltrans to prepare a 10-year state rehabilitation  
            plan for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of all state  
            highways and bridges owned by the state.  The plan is to  
            inform the State Highway Operation and Protection Program  
            (SHOPP) by identifying all rehabilitation needs as well as  








                                                                    AB 1164


                                                                    Page  4





            specific milestones and quantifiable accomplishments, such as  
            miles to be repaved and number of bridges to be retrofitted.   
            The plan is required to include strategies to control costs  
            and improve the efficiency of the program.  

          4)Directs Caltrans to develop the SHOPP, a program of major  
            capital projects necessary to preserve and protect the state  
            highway system.  Projects in the SHOPP are limited to those  
            that do not add new capacity to the system.  



          5)Requires Caltrans, in consultation with the CTC, to prepare an  
            asset management plan to guide development of the SHOPP and  
            requires CTC to adopt related targets and performance measures  
            that reflect state policy goals and objectives.  

          6)Vests CTC with authority to review and approve the final asset  
            management plan, as described.  

          7)As set forth in the federal Moving Ahead for Progress in the  
            21st Century Act (MAP-21), requires each state to develop a  
            risk-based asset management plan for the national highway  
            system to improve or preserve the condition of the assets and  
            the performance of the system.
          


          FISCAL EFFECT:  Unknown





          COMMENTS:  Caltrans is responsible for maintaining and operating  
          the approximately 50,000 lane-mile state highway system,  
          including nearly 13,000 bridges.  The department monitors the  
          condition and operational performance of the state highway  
          through periodic inspections, traffic studies, and system  








                                                                    AB 1164


                                                                    Page  5





          analysis.  From this, Caltrans prepares its ten-year SHOPP plan.  
           The plan is required by existing law to include the identified  
          needs for a ten-year period based on quantifiable  
          accomplishments and a cost estimate for at least the first five  
          years.  According to Caltrans, the goal-constrained needs  
          developed as a part of this analysis represents the estimated  
          cost to meet reasonable performance goals.  For example, for  
          pavements, the goal is to reduce the current level of distressed  
          lane miles of pavement on the state highway system down to 10%  
          in ten years.  Other elements of the SHOPP have similar  
          performance goals, such as:





          1)Roadway preservation:  Reduce to 10% the number of distressed  
            lane miles.



          2)Bridge preservation:  Reduce to 3% of bridges distressed.



          3)Major damage:  Restore damage within 180 days.
          Through the ten-year SHOPP plan, and other tools, Caltrans uses  
          a strategic approach to managing highway assets.  This approach  
          has been already endorsed at the federal and state level.  In  
          fact, recent legislation at both the federal and state levels  
          already require Caltrans to develop a system to evaluate its  
          assets much like the one required by this bill.  For example,  
          MAP-21 requires each state to develop a risk-based asset  
          management plan for the national highway system to improve or  
          preserve the condition of the assets and the performance of the  
          system.  The plans are to include strategies that lead to  
          progress toward achieving specific targets related to asset  
          condition and performance.  At a minimum, states must address  
          pavements and bridges but are encouraged to include all  








                                                                    AB 1164


                                                                    Page  6





          infrastructure assets within the highway right-of-way in their  
          asset management plan.  Additionally, the federally required  
          asset management plan is to include:  



          1)A summary listing of the pavement and bridge assets on the  
            national highway system in the state, including a description  
            of the condition of those assets;





          2)Asset management objectives and measures;





          3)Performance gap identification;





          4)Lifecycle cost and risk management analysis;





          5)A financial plan; and,





          6)Investment strategies.








                                                                    AB 1164


                                                                    Page  7






          Last session, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed SB  
          486 (DeSaulnier), Chapter 917, Statutes of 2014, that, among  
          other things, requires Caltrans to prepare an asset management  
          plan to guide development of the SHOPP.  Asset management is a  
          strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining, and  
          improving physical assets.  Caltrans focuses on engineering and  
          economic analysis, based upon quality information, to identify a  
          structured sequence of maintenance, preservation, repair,  
          rehabilitation, and replacement actions that will achieve and  
          sustain a desired and sustainable state of good repair over the  
          lifecycle of the assets at minimum practicable cost.



          Unlike MAP-21, SB 486 did not identify specific categories of  
          assets to include in the asset management plan.  Instead it  
          requires CTC to adopt targets and performance measures that  
          reflect state policy goals and objectives.  





          AB 1164 requires Caltrans to conduct an evaluation using  
          specified measures, including:


            


          1)International Roughness Index: This index is used to monitor  
            pavement smoothness.  IRI data measures the relative up and  
            down movement of the vehicle.  On a smooth road, such as a  
            newly paved rehabilitation project, the up and down movement  
            is low.  On rough pavements, IRI values are high.











                                                                    AB 1164


                                                                    Page  8





          2)Bride Health Index:  A single-number assessment of a bridge's  
            condition based on the bridge's economic worth, determined  
            from an element level inspection.  The index makes it possible  
            to ascertain the structural quality of a single bridge or a  
            network of bridges and to make objective comparisons with  
            other bridges or networks.



          The author believes the state highway system is in dire need of  
          improvement.  He notes that it is operating well beyond its  
          design life and beyond its capacity.  Additionally, he is  
          concerned that continued population growth imposes even greater  
          wear and tear on the already-aging system.  He introduced AB  
          1164 to provide a valuable tool for decision makers to help them  
          prioritize projects.  





          Committee concern:  The author's desire for a performance  
          management approach to managing the state's highway system is  
          just the sort of approach that could lead to a better use of the  
          state's limited transportation resources.  The problem with the  
          bill is, however, this approach is already being done at the  
          local, state, and federal levels. 





          Previous legislation:  SB 486 (DeSaulnier), Chapter 917,  
          Statutes of 2014, among other things, requires Caltrans, in  
          consultation with the CTC, to prepare an asset management plan  
          to guide development of the SHOPP and requires CTC to adopt  
          related targets and performance measures that reflect state  
          policy goals and objectives.









                                                                    AB 1164


                                                                    Page  9






          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:




          Support


          None on file




          Opposition


          None on file




          Analysis Prepared by:Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093