BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1174


                                                                    Page  1





          GOVERNOR'S VETO


          AB  
          1174 (Bonilla)


          As Enrolled  September 8, 2016


          2/3 vote


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |      |(January 27,   |SENATE: |36-0  |(August 18,      |
          |           |      |2016)          |        |      |2016)            |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
                 (vote not relevant)


           ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |COMMITTEE VOTE: |16-0 |(August 24,     |RECOMMENDATION:   |concur     |
          |                |     |2016)           |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
          |                |     |                |                  |           |
           ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          (B. & P.)


           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |79-0  |(August 30,    |        |      |                 |








                                                                    AB 1174


                                                                    Page  2





          |           |      |2016)          |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
          |           |      |               |        |      |                 |
           -------------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Original Committee Reference:  B. & P.


          SUMMARY:  Requires the Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR) to  
          adopt regulations regarding its policies and procedures for  
          handling specified enforcement actions, as specified, requires  
          the BAR to track and retain data on every method of resolution,  
          and requires the BAR to submit a report that details the BAR's  
          resolution efforts to the Legislature by January 1, 2018, and  
          annually thereafter, as specified.  


          The Senate amendments delete the original contents of this bill  
          and insert the current contents. 


          FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.


          COMMENTS:


          Purpose.  This bill is sponsored by the author.  According to  
          the author, the "BAR is tasked with overseeing the state's ARDs  
          [automotive repair dealers] and protecting California consumers,  
          but it is unclear what policies and procedures they have in  
          place for handling consumer complaints and their subsequent  
          investigations and resolutions.  [This bill] will enhance the  
          transparency of [ARDs] and BAR, improve consumer protection by  
          requiring BAR to adopt regulations, and develop a clear process  








                                                                    AB 1174


                                                                    Page  3





          for handling complaints, investigations and all methods of  
          resolution.  In addition, this bill will help ensure a higher  
          standard of business practices in the auto repair industry by  
          requiring BAR to track and retain data on every resolution to a  
          consumer complaint, attempted and completed by BAR."


          Background.  In February 2016, the National Broadcasting Company  
          (NBC) Bay Area Investigative Unit ran a report which  
          investigated a situation in which a San Jose Midas automobile  
          repair shop covered up damage to a SUV (sport utility vehicle)  
          that fell from a mechanical lift.  While the vehicle was  
          elevated by a mechanical lift, the vehicle fell on its side and  
          was significantly damaged.  After the shop returned the vehicle,  
          the family noticed several issues and reported the issues to the  
          shop.  


          According to the NBC report, the shop initially denied that  
          there were any issues.  Eventually, whistleblower employees  
          contacted the family and explained that the district manager  
          ordered them to repair the vehicle without informing the family  
          of what happened.  The NBC report states that the district  
          manager "confirmed 'the lift malfunctioned' and in a memo to the  
          [family] admitted, there was a 'cover-up,' but [the district  
          manager] denied any involvement and blamed it all on [the]  
          employees."


          According to the NBC report, the family filed a complaint with  
          the BAR.  However, at the time, discussions with both Midas and  
          the BAR led to no resolution for the family and the family  
          considered suing.  


          Bureau of Automotive Repair.  The BAR is the state agency tasked  
          with enforcing the Automotive Repair Act.  Both the Automotive  
          Repair Act and the BAR were established by SB 51 (Beilenson),  
          Chapter 1578, Statutes of 1971.  The purpose of the Act is to  








                                                                    AB 1174


                                                                    Page  4





          provide an additional layer of consumer protection from unsafe  
          and unethical automotive repair practices and improve consumer  
          confidence.


          The Act protects consumers by establishing various notice and  
          technician competency requirements that ARDs must follow.  Those  
          who wish to perform automotive repairs for a fee must register  
          with the BAR and comply with the requirements, which include  
          providing various notices and prohibit incompetent, negligent,  
          and fraudulent practices.  The Act makes it a crime, usually a  
          misdemeanor, for failing to register or otherwise fail to comply  
          with the requirements if performing repairs as defined by the  
          Act.  


          The Act authorizes the BAR to mediate complaints, investigate  
          violations, and take disciplinary action against ARDs and  
          technicians that fail to comply with the Act or the BAR's  
          regulations.  The BAR can be viewed as a first line of defense  
          against unfair, deceptive, and harmful practices.  The BAR's  
          broad investigatory authority includes the ability to perform  
          interviews, inspect premises, and utilize sting operations. 


          However, the BAR is an administrative and regulatory agency, not  
          a law enforcement agency.  The BAR's statutory authority is  
          limited to administrative fines and various actions related to  
          an ARD's registration.  Further, as a state agency, it is  
          required to comply with the due process rights of its  
          registrants, and all registrants are entitled to notice and a  
          hearing when being deprived of a registration. 


          Still, operating without a registration when required by the Act  
          is a crime.  If the BAR finds an egregious case, it is  
          authorized to refer the case to a district attorney or city  
          attorney for prosecution.  In addition, consumers may sue for  
          damages. 








                                                                    AB 1174


                                                                    Page  5







          GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE:


          I am returning Assembly Bill 1174 without my signature.


          This bill requires the Bureau of Automotive Repair (Bureau) to  
          adopt regulations regarding its policies and procedures for  
          handling complaints and investigations.


          This bill is unnecessary and duplicative of existing practice at  
          the Bureau.




          Analysis Prepared by:                                             
                          Vincent Chee / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301  FN:   
          0005060