BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1198|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  AB 1198
          Author:   Dababneh (D) 
          Amended:  8/18/15 in Senate
          Vote:     21 

           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE:  9-0, 7/15/15
           AYES:  Liu, Runner, Block, Hancock, Leyva, Mendoza, Monning,  
            Pan, Vidak

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  76-0, 5/26/15 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote

           SUBJECT:   School facilities:  California School Finance  
                     Authority:  California Credit Enhancement Program


          SOURCE:    California Charter Schools Association

          DIGEST:  This bill establishes the California Credit Enhancement  
          Program (CCEP) within the California School Finance Authority  
          (CSFA) to provide lower cost alternatives for public school  
          facilities financing through public-private partnerships.


          ANALYSIS:  


          Existing law:


           1) Establishes the CSFA Act, and makes findings and  
             declarations regarding the interest of the state and its  
             people for the state to reconstruct, remodel or replace  








                                                                    AB 1198  
                                                                    Page  2


             existing school buildings that do not meet structural safety  
             requirements; acquire new school sites and buildings for  
             school districts, charter schools and community college  
             districts; and assist school districts and community college  
             districts by providing access to financing for working  
             capital and capital improvements. (Education Code § 17170 and  
             § 17171)


           2) Establishes the CSFA, comprised of the Treasurer or his/her  
             designee, who serves as the Chairperson; the director of the  
             Department of Finance or his/her designee; and the  
             Superintendent of Public Instruction or his/her designee.   
             (EC § 17172 and § 17174)


           3) Specifies the powers and authorities of the CSFA, including  
             the authority to issue revenue bonds to provide funds for the  
             financing or refinancing of a single, a series or several  
             projects, or financing of working capital for a single party  
             or several participating parties.  Expresses the intent of  
             the Legislature to provide financing only for projects  
             demonstrated by the participating party to be financially  
             feasible, and specifies that revenue bonds are not and shall  
             not be deemed to constitute a debt or liability of the state,  
             obligate the state to pay the principal or interest, or  
             obligate the state to levy or pledge any form of taxation or  
             make any appropriation for their payment.  (EC § 17180, §  
             17183 and § 17185)


          This bill:


           1) Makes various findings and declarations regarding charter  
             school facilities and the programs administered by the CSFA,  
             as specified.


           2) Establishes the CCEP within the CSFA to establish a fund to  
             be used to insure facility bonds issued by the CSFA in order  
             to achieve lower cost alternatives for public school  
             facilities financing. 








                                                                    AB 1198  
                                                                    Page  3



           3) Authorizes the CSFA to leverage its funding for the CCEP so  
             the amount of credit insurance provided pursuant to the  
             program exceeds the amount of funds on deposit in the  
             California Credit Enhancement Account, as proposed to be  
             established by this bill within the existing CSFA Funds. 


           4) Requires the CSFA to deposit funds and fees identified for  
             the CCEP in this account. Authorizes CSFA to designate and  
             hold separately one or more subaccounts. Specifies that  
             nothing shall be construed to require the CSFA to deposit, or  
             the Legislature to appropriate, funds for the purposes of the  
             CCEP.


           5) Requires CSFA to adopt regulations to implement the CCEP and  
             specifies that they may consult with subject matter experts  
             in the development of the regulations, including eligibility  
             criteria for participating public schools, e.g., financial  
             performance, organizational and governance criteria,  
             parameters and procedures for the provision of credit  
             enhancement to eligible financing transactions, and the  
             application process and fee schedule.  


           6) Provides that a public school that is fiscally sound and  
             that has a good credit rating may participate in the CCEP.


           7) Requires the regulations to include a definition of  
             "default" for purposes of the CCEP, and procedures so that,  
             in the event of a default, funds from the California Credit  
             Enhancement Account are paid out only after all other sources  
             of payment and credit enhancement to an eligible financing  
             transaction are exhausted. 


           8) Requires the regulations to create options, in the event of  
             a default, to ensure that the first priority of the facility  
             is for the continued use of school purposes.  These options  
             may include, but not be limited to, the re-let or sale of the  
             facility to another public school or a mechanism whereby the  
             state has a right of first refusal to purchase the facility  







                                                                    AB 1198  
                                                                    Page  4


             instead of it being sold in a foreclosure sale.


           9) Specifies that bond insurance, credit enhancement, or other  
             guarantees issued under this program shall not be deemed to  
             constitute a debt or liability of the state and shall not be  
             deemed to be a pledge of the faith and credit of the state  
             other than the authority. Bond insurance, credit enhancement,  
             or other guarantees of the authority shall be payable solely  
             from funds available in the California Credit Enhancement  
             Account. 


           10)Requires that each bond insurance policy, credit enhancement  
             instrument, or other guarantee of the CSFA issued under the  
             CCEP shall include a statement on its face that neither the  
             State of California nor the CSFA is obligated to pay the  
             principal or interest of the bonds covered by the CCEP.


           11)Provides that the issue of bond insurance, credit  
             enhancement, or other guarantees shall not directly,  
             indirectly, or contingently obligate the state or any  
             political subdivision thereof, to levy or pledge any form of  
             taxation, or make any appropriation for their payment.


          Comments


          Need for the bill.  The author's office indicates that "the  
          biggest challenge currently faced by charter schools is finding  
          a suitable facility and funding for that facility.  Charter  
          public schools typically do not receive local funding through  
          bonds, as traditional public schools do, and must pay for their  
          facility out of their general operating expenses, taking money  
          out of the classroom to pay for that classroom.  As a result,  
          many charter schools turn to private financing and bond  
          transactions in order to pay for a long-term facilities  
          solution."  According to the bill's sponsor, the California  
          Charter Schools Association, the purpose of this bill is to  
          establish an account within the CSFA that can be used as credit  
          insurance or credit enhancement.  The credit insurance is used  
          to back the bonds CSFA issues on behalf of charter schools.  If  







                                                                    AB 1198  
                                                                    Page  5


          a charter school defaults on bond payments, the account set up  
          by this bill will be used to pay the debt.  The sponsor  
          indicates that having a source to guarantee bonds will hopefully  
          lead to lower interest rates for the construction or renovation  
          of charter school facilities. 


          Charter school facilities.  Unlike traditional public school  
          districts, charter schools are unable to fund facilities with  
          general obligation bonds approved by local voters.  A majority  
          of charter schools lease their facilities and pay the associated  
          costs from their operating budgets, with roughly half of them  
          receiving grants from the Charter School Facility Grant Program  
          (SB 740, O'Connell, Chapter 892, Statutes of 2001).  This  
          program provides funding for charter schools in non-district  
          facilities that have a specified percentage of students  
          qualifying for free or reduced-price meals at their school or in  
          the surrounding school attendance area.  Eligible schools  
          receive funding for lease payments, building improvements, and  
          maintenance.  


          A majority of the remaining charter schools that do not lease  
          private facilities occupy space provided by school districts.   
          Proposition 39, approved by voters in November 2000, requires a  
          school district to provide a charter school having a projected  
          daily attendance of at least 80 or more students from that  
          district with "reasonably equivalent" facilities to accommodate  
          the charter school's needs.  A school district can provide a  
          charter school with existing facilities or use discretionary  
          funds or other revenues, such as local school bond funds, to  
          meet this requirement.  A small percentage of charter schools  
          have constructed their own facilities.  Given the continuing  
          growth in charter school enrollment combined with limited  
          options for charters to finance their facilities, this bill  
          could provide an additional means to help address their facility  
          needs.   


          California School Finance Authority.  The CSFA was established  
          as a conduit to secure financing for working capital and  
          facilities projects for school districts, charter schools and  
          community college districts.  The CSFA operates under the  
          Treasurer's Office.  According to the Treasurer's Office,  







                                                                    AB 1198  
                                                                    Page  6


          because school districts and community colleges are able to  
          issue general obligation bonds on their own, the CSFA has  
          provided financing mostly to charter schools.  Over the last  
          four years, CSFA has issued $279.6 million bonds for 120 charter  
          school facilities.  Charter schools are the obligor and make  
          bond payments through an intercept process whereby the State  
          Controller intercepts or redirects state funds allocated to  
          charter schools to make bond payments.  According to the CSFA,  
          bonds are typically sold to large institutional investors, with  
          interest rates ranging between 4.19% to 7.58% over the last four  
          years.  


          Other states.  The program proposed by this bill is modeled  
          after similar programs in Texas and Colorado. The Texas Credit  
          Enhancement Program received a $10 million federal grant to  
          establish a credit enhancement program for charter schools to  
          finance the acquisition, construction, repair, or renovation of  
          charter school facilities.  As part of this program, debt  
          service reserve funds are held in the State treasury solely to  
          provide security for repayment of the bonds. The funds are not  
          provided directly to the approved charter schools for  
          construction.  Colorado has the "Moral Obligation Program."   
          According to the Colorado Department of Treasury Web site, this  
          program enhances the credit of a qualified charter school.  A  
          qualified charter school is one that has obtained an investment  
          grade credit rating on a "stand-alone" basis. The enhancement  
          enables these qualified schools to obtain even more favorable  
          financing terms on their capital construction bonds.  The  
          program is funded from a separate source of monies from which  
          the Treasury would make bond payments in the case of a default  
          by a charter school. 




          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    Yes         Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   No


          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:


           CSFA indicates a need for one position and $160,000 to support  







                                                                    AB 1198  
                                                                    Page  7


            start-up activities, including developing regulations and  
            administering the CCEP until enough revenue is generated from  
            fees to support the program.  (General Fund)


           Unknown, likely significant cost pressure at least in the  
            millions to support the program.  Without an identified  
            funding source, this bill puts pressure on the state to  
            provide funding.  (General Fund) 


           To the extent adequate funding is provided at the state level,  
            there could be potential savings to participating charter  
            schools as they may obtain better financing terms due to  
            insured school facility bonds through the CCEP.


          SUPPORT:   (Verified8/12/16)


          California Charter Schools Association (source)


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified8/12/16)


          None received


          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  76-0, 5/26/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bonilla,  
            Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang, Chau,  
            Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd,  
            Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia,  
            Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray,  
            Grove, Hadley, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones,  
            Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low,  
            Maienschein, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin,  
            Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea,  
            Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago,  
            Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber,  
            Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bloom, Chávez, Harper, Mathis








                                                                    AB 1198  
                                                                    Page  8


          Prepared by:Lenin DelCastillo / ED. / (916) 651-4105
          8/18/16 15:42:34


                                   ****  END  ****