BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                    AB 1215


                                                                    Page  1





          Date of Hearing:  May 13, 2015


                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS


                                 Jimmy Gomez, Chair


          AB  
          1215 (Ting) - As Amended March 26, 2015


           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Policy       |Accountability and             |Vote:|9 - 0        |
          |Committee:   |Administrative Review          |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |Privacy and Consumer           |     |11 - 0       |
          |             |Protection                     |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------|
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
          |             |                               |     |             |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          Urgency:  No  State Mandated Local Program:  NoReimbursable:  No


          SUMMARY:




          This bill creates the California Open Data Act and the position  








                                                                    AB 1215


                                                                    Page  2





          of the Chief Data Officer (CDO) to be appointed by the Governor.  
          The CDO is required to work with state agencies and experts to  
          create a California Open Data Standard (CODS) and a centralized  
          Internet Web portal for the public to access public data from  
          state agencies. Specifically, this bill:  


          1)Defines "public data" as all data collected by a state agency  
            that is subject to disclosure under the California Public  
            Records Act (PRA). 


          2)Creates a CDO, appointed by the Governor and serving under the  
            Secretary of the Government Operations Agency, and requires  
            the CDO to:


             a)   Inventory all available public data in the state;


             b)   Establish the CODS;


             c)   Publish, by March 1, 2016, a technical standards manual  
               for state agencies; and


             d)   Establish, by July 1, 2016, a Data Working Group  
               comprised of a data coordinator from each major state  
               agency and two open data experts.  


          3)Specifies the CODS requirements regarding format, updates,  
            availability of data, and search technologies, and specifies  
            the legal policies regarding the data.


          4)Requires each state agency to a) submit to the CDO, by July 1,  
            2016, a strategic plan and a strategic enterprise application  








                                                                    AB 1215


                                                                    Page  3





            plan; b) release data to the public via the centralized  
            Internet web portal; and c) report to the CDO if the agency is  
            unable to make data available, stating the reasons it is  
            unable to do so. 


          5)Permits local governments to adopt the CODS.


          FISCAL EFFECT: 


          1)Unknown costs, likely in the hundreds of thousands of dollars,  
            to the Government Operations Agency to create a CDO, and to  
            provide staff sufficient to carry out the required duties of a  
            statewide data inventory, establishing a CODS, developing and  
            publishing a technical manual, establishing a working group  
            within the timeframe allowed in the bill.


          2)Unknown, but significant costs, likely in the millions of  
            dollars statewide, to state agencies to collaborate with the  
            statewide data portal and to review and inventory public data.  
            For example, the California Department of Insurance estimates  
            it would cost them $199,000 in FY 2015-16, $377,000 in  
            2016-17, and $180,000 ongoing to interact with the Internet  
            Web portal and to inventory the Department's data and redact  
            non-public information.


          3)State agency costs may be partially offset in future years to  
            the extent there is a decrease in PRA requests.


          COMMENTS:


          1)Purpose. This bill is intended to increase government  
            transparency by expanding public access to state agency  








                                                                    AB 1215


                                                                    Page  4





            records and databases, to the extent such records and data are  
            already required to be open to the public under the Public  
            Records Act (PRA).  The bill requires state agencies to make  
            public data available in electronic formats that are easy to  
            access, download, analyze and interpret. According to the  
            author, "Access to public records is a cumbersome process for  
            people and organizations that use them. Many times requests  
            are granted with paper or PDF versions of data that is not  
            easily used or analyzed. The intent of public records is not  
            to create a more difficult process by having unusable data,  
            but to increase access for public consumption."  


          2)Background. California has a centralized data portal at  
            Data.CA.gov. The portal contains state government data in raw,  
            machine-readable formats that can be reformatted and reused in  
            different ways.  According to the Data.CA.gov website, more  
            than 100 million data records are available through the portal  
            including: vital statistics such as population, birth, death,  
            and marriage data; more than 50 million data records on  
            education; California port import/export data; state highway  
            traffic data; data on vehicle accidents, fatalities, and  
            injuries; tourism data; water resource data; and geospatial  
            data. And in 2010, Data.CA.gov launched a search function for  
            several of the datasets, charts, and graphs. The Data.CA.gov  
            datasets are available in variety of open formats including  
            CSV, XLS, KML, TXT, and XML.  



          The California Health and Human Services Agency and the State  
            Controller's Office have been leaders among state agencies in  
            the effort to move toward open data standards for public data.  
            This bill seeks to require all state agencies to provide  
            centralized access to all public data in an open data format.
          3)Related Legislation.


             a)   SB 573 (Pan), pending in the Senate Appropriations  








                                                                    AB 1215


                                                                    Page  5





               Committee, creates a CDO in state government and  
               establishes a statewide open data portal to provide public  
               access to date sets from agencies within the state.


             b)   AB 169 (Maienschein), pending referral in the Senate,  
               would require a local agency, except a school district,  
               that voluntarily posts a public record that is described as  
               "open" on its Internet website to post the public record in  
               an open format, as defined.


             c)   SB 272 (Hertzberg), pending referral in the Assembly,  
               would require a local agency to create a catalog of  
               "enterprise systems" utilized by the agency, make the  
               catalog available to the public upon request in the  
               agency's offices, and to post the catalog on the agency's  
               website.


          1)Prior Legislation. SB 1002 (Yee) of 2012 would have required  
            the State Chief Information Officer to conduct a study to  
            determine the feasibility of providing electronic records in a  
            open format. SB 1002 was vetoed by the Governor.


          


          Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081
















                                                                    AB 1215


                                                                    Page  6