BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH Senator Ed Hernandez, O.D., Chair BILL NO: AB 1231 --------------------------------------------------------------- |AUTHOR: |Wood | |---------------+-----------------------------------------------| |VERSION: |May 28, 2015 | --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- |HEARING DATE: |June 17, 2015 | | | --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- |CONSULTANT: |Scott Bain | --------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT : Medi-Cal: nonmedical transportation. SUMMARY :1. Adds nonmedical transportation as a Medi-Cal benefit for a beneficiary to obtain covered specialty care Medi-Cal services, if those services are more than 60 minutes or 30 miles from the beneficiary's place of residence. Existing law: 1)Establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. 2)Establishes a schedule of benefits under the Medi-Cal program, which includes medical transportation services, subject to utilization controls, and in-home medical care services when medically appropriate and subject to utilization controls, for beneficiaries who would otherwise require care for an extended period of time in an acute care hospital at a cost higher than in-home medical care services. Included within the definition of in-home medical care services are emergency and nonemergency medical transportation This bill: 1)Adds nonmedical transportation (NMT) as a Medi-Cal benefit for a beneficiary to obtain covered specialty care Medi-Cal services, if those services are more than 60 minutes or 30 miles from the beneficiary's place of residence. 2)Defines NMT to include, but not be limited to, roundtrip transportation for a beneficiary to obtain covered specialty care Medi-Cal services by passenger car, taxicab, or any other form of public or private conveyance, mileage reimbursement for conveyance by private vehicle, bus passes, taxi vouchers, AB 1231 (Wood) Page 2 of ? or train tickets. 3)Excludes from the definition of NMT the transportation of sick, injured, invalid, convalescent, infirm, or otherwise incapacitated beneficiaries by ambulances, litter vans, or wheelchair vans licensed, operated and equipped in accordance with state and local statutes, ordinances or regulations. 4)Requires NMT to be provided in a form and manner that is accessible, in terms of physical and geographic accessibility, for the beneficiary, and consistent with policies and procedures established for a beneficiary with a disability. 5)States legislative intent in enacting this bill to affirm the requirement under a specified provision of federal regulation in which DHCS is required to ensure necessary transportation for recipients to and from providers. 6)Prohibits this bill from being interpreted to add a new benefit to the Medi-Cal program. 7)Permits DHCS to seek approval of any necessary state plan amendments to implement this bill. 8)Requires this bill to be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available and any necessary federal approvals have been obtained. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, unknown cost pressure, potentially in the range of $1 million in Medi-Cal managed care, and low hundreds of thousands in direct costs in fee-for-service (FFS) Medi-Cal annually (General Fund/majority federal). Due to data limitations this estimate is fairly rough, it assumes a small percentage of rural Medi-Cal enrollees receives transportation services each year for a single specialty visit; is based on 20,000 additional transports in managed care, and 5,000 in FFS annually at a cost of $50 per transport. The cost of mandating NMT as a covered benefit in Medi-Cal depends on several factors, which are in turn subject to significant uncertainty and change. Some additional cost dynamics and cost offsets are described below: 1)To the extent better access to transportation increases utilization of specialty care services, additional unknown AB 1231 (Wood) Page 3 of ? costs in FFS and cost pressure on managed care rates for more specialty care visits. These increased costs for specialty care would be offset to some extent by cost savings from better management of chronic conditions, fewer complications, and reduced emergency room use. 2)Managed care plans, as well as the DHCS, are likely to experience some administrative costs to institute policies and procedures to ensure coverage complies with the defined standards. 3)The actual impact on managed care rates from the potential increased cost pressure identified here is unknown and may depend in part on how it compares to what plans currently provide. 4)Since the coverage of NMT is only available for visits that meet a certain time/distance standard, to the extent provider networks in both managed care plans and FFS Medi-Cal grow more robust, the demand for transportation services would decrease. The inverse is also true; if networks grew more sparse, demand for transportation would increase based on a higher likelihood that visits meet the defined standard. 5)Utilization of transportation services for specialty visits, and corresponding costs, could also vary dramatically based on whether beneficiaries and providers know it is a covered benefit, and how easy it is to access. PRIOR VOTES : ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Assembly Floor: |76 - 0 | |------------------------------------+----------------------------| |Assembly Appropriations Committee: |17 - 0 | |------------------------------------+----------------------------| |Assembly Health Committee: |18 - 0 | | | | AB 1231 (Wood) Page 4 of ? ----------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENTS : 1)Author's statement. According to the author, NMT, defined as transportation of members to medical services by passenger car, taxicabs, or other forms of public or private conveyances provided by persons not registered as Medi-Cal providers, is only a covered Medi-Cal benefit for children and Cal MediConnect beneficiaries. Unfortunately, for all other beneficiaries, NMT is an optional benefit that plans may provide. Although plans provide for this service, beneficiaries report difficulty accessing this service due to wide variances in policies and procedures. The Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC), which licenses and oversees most health plan and requires licensed health plans to comply with network adequacy requirements, includes geographic access to care requirements. DMHC has no geographic or timely access standards for specialty care. AB 1231 ensures that low-income beneficiaries in rural areas have access to transportation for their specialty care needs. The bill requires that NMT will be provided to specialty care beneficiaries if those services are more than 60 minutes or 30 miles from the beneficiary's place of residence. 2)Background on Medi-Cal coverage of transportation. Medi-Cal coverage of transportation services is governed by state and federal law. Federal regulations require a state's Medicaid State Plan to specify that the Medicaid agency will ensure necessary transportation for recipients to and from providers, and to describe the methods that the agency will use to meet this requirement. California's Medicaid State Plan indicates California provides both emergency and non-emergency medical transportation. DHCS distinguishes between non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) and NMT. NEMT is transport by ambulance, litter van, and wheelchair van medical transportation when transport by ordinary means of public or private conveyance is medically contraindicated, and transportation is required for the purpose of obtaining needed medical care. By contrast, NMT is transportation of members to medical services by passenger car, taxicabs, or other forms of public or private conveyances provided by persons not registered as Medi-Cal providers. NMT does not include the transportation of sick, injured, invalid, convalescent, infirm, or otherwise incapacitated members by ambulances, litter vans, or wheelchair vans licensed, operated and equipped in accordance with state and local statutes, ordinances or regulations. AB 1231 (Wood) Page 5 of ? DHCS indicates NMT is covered for children under age 21 through the Early and Periodic Diagnosis and Treatment Program (EPSDT), and for dually eligible beneficiaries enrolled in CalMediConnect plans (plans that combine Medicare and Medi-Cal benefits in one health plan, which operate in seven counties). CalMediConnect beneficiaries receive up to 30 one-way trips per year with no co-payment. For Medi-Cal beneficiaries enrolled in Medi-Cal managed care plans, 17 out of 21 plans DHCS surveyed reported having a contracted network for NEMT, and the four health plans that did not have a network were in the process of contracting with a vendor or were utilizing only qualified Medi-Cal providers. 3)Support. This bill is sponsored by the Western Center on Law and Poverty (WCLP), which writes that this measure would clarify that accessible nonmedical transportation is a covered Medi-Cal benefit, including roundtrip transportation for beneficiaries who must travel more than 60 minutes or 30 miles from his/her residence to access specialty care. The time and distance standard is based on the Department of Insurance's specialty care service standards and is double the standards DMHC has for primary care providers of 30 minutes or 15 miles. WCLP argues access to transportation services is critical for rural residents where distances to specialty care are significant, public transport is scarce, and low-income beneficiaries cannot afford the limited transportation options available. Although transportation to and from health care services is "assured" through California's Medicaid State Plan, variation in implementation of this benefit leaves many remaining questions regarding the basic availability and criteria for getting such benefits. WCLP states that, for many rural Medi-Cal beneficiaries seeing a specialist is not a one-time trip, but multiple trips where time off work must be requested, childcare needs to be arranged, rides from relatives and friends must be scrounged, and financial tradeoffs must be made. WCLP concludes that this issue is exacerbated by the mandatory transition into managed care for Medi-Cal consumers in 28 mostly rural counties who are reporting farther travel distances to access medically needed specialty services. AB 1231 (Wood) Page 6 of ? 4)Policy issues. a) Current utilization review requirements and this bill. Current Medi-Cal coverage of transportation in Medi-Cal statute is subject to utilization controls. Regulations implementing utilization controls place greater requirement on that benefit than the NMT required to be covered under this bill. For example, ambulance, litter van and wheelchair van medical transportation services are covered only when the beneficiary's medical and physical condition is such that transport by ordinary means of public or private conveyance is medically contraindicated, and transportation is required for the purpose of obtaining needed medical care. In addition, Medi-Cal reimbursement is required to be approved only for the lowest cost type of medical transportation that is adequate for the patient's medical needs, and all NEMT requires a physician's, dentist's or podiatrist's prescription and prior authorization (except for transfers from a hospital to a skilled nursing facility). Finally, transportation is required only to the nearest facility capable of meeting the patient's medical needs. The requirement that NMT be subject to utilization controls is not made explicit in this bill. The author may wish to consider making this benefit subject to utilization controls in the same way as the existing Medi-Cal transportation benefit. b) Implementation of benefit. The author may wish to consider how DHCS would implement the benefit required by this bill as regulations or a provider bulletin/all plan letter would likely be needed to spell out the details of the NMT benefit. SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION : Support: Western Center on Law and Poverty (sponsor) American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Asian Law Alliance California Academy of Family Physicians California Coverage and Health Initiatives, California Pan-Ethnic Health Network California Primary Care Association Children Now Children's Defense Fund of California Disability Rights California Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund AB 1231 (Wood) Page 7 of ? First 5 Mendocino Health Access California Justice in Aging Legal Aid Society of San Diego, Inc. Legal Services of Northern California National Alliance on Mental Illness California National Health Law Program Project Inform Oppose: None received. -- END --