BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING Senator Jim Beall, Chair 2015 - 2016 Regular Bill No: AB 1236 Hearing Date: 7/7/2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Author: |Chiu | |----------+------------------------------------------------------| |Version: |4/20/2015 | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Urgency: |No |Fiscal: |Yes | ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Consultant|Erin Riches | |: | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Local ordinances: electric vehicle charging stations DIGEST: This bill requires each city and county to adopt an ordinance establishing a streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1)Authorizes the legislative body of any city or county to adopt ordinances to regulate a variety of purposes, such as the location, height, bulk, number of stories, and size of buildings and structures. 2)Requires every city and county to adopt an ordinance, by September 30, 2015, to streamline and expedite the permitting process for small, residential, rooftop solar energy systems. This bill: 1) Requires a city or county to administratively approve an application to install electric vehicle charging stations through the issuance of a building or similar permit. 2) Limits review of the application to the building official's review of whether it meets all health and safety requirements of local, state, and federal law. Limits local AB 1236 (Chiu) Page 2 of ? requirements to those standards and regulations necessary to ensure that the electric vehicle charging station will not have a specific, adverse impact on public health or safety. 3) Authorizes a city or county to require the applicant to apply for a use permit if the building official makes a finding, based on substantial evidence, that the proposed installation would have a specific, adverse, impact. Prohibits a city or county from denying an application for a use permit unless it finds that the installation would have a specific, adverse impact which cannot feasibly be mitigated. Allows the applicant to appeal this decision to the local planning commission. 4) Requires any conditions imposed on an application to install an electric vehicle charging station to be designed to mitigate the impact at the lowest possible cost. 5) Requires an electric vehicle charging station to meet applicable health and safety standards and requirements imposed by state and local permitting authorities, as well as all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, accredited testing laboratories, and the Public Utilities Commission. 6) Requires every city or county, in consultation with the local fire department or fire district and the utility director if applicable, to adopt an ordinance by September 30, 2016, to create a streamlined permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations. 7) Requires the city or county to adopt a checklist of requirements the electric vehicle charging station must meet in order to be eligible for expedited review. 8) Requires a city or county to approve an application that is complete, defined as meeting all requirements of the checklist. Requires a city or county to issue the permit or authorization for any complete application. Requires a city or county, upon receiving an incomplete application, to issue a written notice detailing the application's deficiencies and any additional information required in order to be eligible for expedited permit issuance. AB 1236 (Chiu) Page 3 of ? 9) Requires the city or county to publish the checklist and required permitting documentation on its website, if it has one, and to allow for electronic submittal of applications and documentation. Requires the city or county to authorize electronic signatures on all forms, applications, and other documentation. Exempts a city or county from this requirement if it is unable to accept electronic signatures. 10) Requires the city or county ordinance to substantially conform to the recommendations for expedited permitting, including the checklists and standard plans included in the most current version of the "Plug-In Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Permitting Checklist" of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research. Authorizes a city or county to modify these checklists and standards pursuant to unique climactic, geological, seismological, or topographical conditions. 11) Prohibits a city or county from conditioning approval for any electric vehicle charging station permit on the approval of a common-interest development association. COMMENTS: Purpose. In 2012, Governor Brown issued an executive order setting a goal of 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles on California roads by 2025. The author states that lack of certainty and uniformity in the local permitting of electric vehicle charging stations, however, poses an impediment to deploying electric vehicle charging stations. The current patchwork of regulations and requirements, which vary from city to city and from county to county, hinders the ability of prospective electric vehicle buyers to understand the administrative burden and cost of installing electric vehicle charging stations before purchasing an electric vehicle. The author states that this bill will help lower the cost of installation, expedite permitting, and further expand the infrastructure needed to meet statewide goals. A new precedent? AB 2188 (Muratsuchi, Chapter 521, Statutes of 2014) requires every city and county, in consultation with fire and utility officials, to adopt an ordinance by September 30, 2015, to streamline and expedite the permitting process for AB 1236 (Chiu) Page 4 of ? small, residential, rooftop solar energy systems. AB 2188 was intended to respond to a Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) recommendation to streamline the permitting process for solar energy systems to help bring down "soft costs" such as the local agency permitting and inspection process. The author states that this bill is modeled after AB 2188. The California State Association of Counties (CSAC), writing in opposition to this bill, states that both AB 2188 and this bill "establish special treatment for some industries over others." CSAC also raises concerns that other factors must be considered in the installation of electric vehicle charging stations; for example, questions have arisen regarding accessibility requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Local control. The League of California Cities (League), writing in opposition to this bill, raises three concerns: this bill imposes costly requirements without providing funding; this bill establishes an expensive electronic submittal process for permitting; and this bill builds upon a bad precedent for tiered levels of public service. The League asks for amendments to provide funding, remove the requirement for a city to adopt an ordinance to implement the new permitting process, and to make implementation contingent upon local demand. The California Municipal Utilities Association (CMUA), also writing in opposition, states that this bill "seeks to impose a 'one-size-fits-all' approach ? without any consideration of the staffing needs for each city, or whether such permits are better suited for residential customers versus non-residential customers." Picking a winner? This bill addresses permitting for electric vehicle charging stations, but does not address infrastructure for other types of clean vehicle technology. Checklist requirement. This bill requires the city or county ordinance to substantially conform to the recommendations for expedited permitting, including the checklists and standard plans included in the most current version of OPR's "Plug-In Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Permitting Checklist." Opponents of this bill have raised concerns that the checklist is not only quite detailed, but was not vetted through a public process. To address these concerns, the author will accept amendments to change "substantially" to "reasonably." What's top priority? CMUA points out that this bill makes it AB 1236 (Chiu) Page 5 of ? unclear whether electric vehicle charging station permits should take priority over permits issued pursuant to AB 2188. To address this concern, the author will accept amendments authorizing a city or county to set the priorities of competing expedited permits. Implementation schedule. This bill requires every city or county to adopt a streamlined electric vehicle charging station permitting ordinance by September 30, 2016. Opponents of this bill have raised concerns that it will be very difficult for small cities and counties in particular to comply so quickly. To address this concern, the author will accept amendments to instead require cities and counties with a population of 200,000 or more to comply by September 30, 2016, and cities and counties of less than 200,000 population to comply by September 30, 2017. Double referred. This bill was approved by the Governance and Finance Committee on June 17, 2015, on a 6-1 vote. Related Legislation: AB 2188 (Muratsuchi, Chapter 521, Statutes of 2014) - requires every city and county to adopt an ordinance by September 30, 2015, to streamline and expedite the permitting process for small, residential, rooftop solar energy systems. AB 2565 (Muratsuchi, Chapter 529, Statutes of 2014) - requires an owner of a commercial or residential property to approve the installation of an electric vehicle charging station if it meets specified requirements and complies with the owner's process for approving a modification to the property. SB 1275 (De León, Chapter 530, Statutes of 2014) - establishes the Charge Ahead California Initiative at the state Air Resources Board to provide incentives that increase the availability of zero-emission and near-zero-emission vehicles, particularly in disadvantaged and low- and moderate-income communities. AB 1092 (Levine, Chapter 410, Statutes of 2013) - requires the state Building Standards Commission to adopt mandatory standards for the installation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure for parking spaces in newly constructed multifamily dwellings and non-residential development in the next triennial edition of the California Building Standards Code. AB 1236 (Chiu) Page 6 of ? SB 209 (Corbett, Chapter 121, Statutes of 2011) - provides that a prohibition or restriction on the installation or use of an electrical vehicle charging station in any of the governing documents of a common-interest development is void and unenforceable. Assembly Votes: Floor: 76-0 Appr: 15-0 Trans: 16-0 LGov: 8-0 FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes POSITIONS: (Communicated to the committee before noon on Wednesday, July 1, 2015.) SUPPORT: California Apartment Association Coalition for Clean Air ChargePoint League of Conservation Voters Natural Resources Defense Council NRG Energy, Inc. Sierra Club California Silicon Valley Leadership Group TechNet OPPOSITION: California Municipal Utilities Association California State Association of Counties City of Burbank City of San Marcos League of California Cities Marin County Council of Mayors and Councilmembers Northern California Power Agency Urban Counties Caucus AB 1236 (Chiu) Page 7 of ? -- END --