BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó






           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                       AB 1250|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520    Fax: (916)      |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


                                   THIRD READING 


          Bill No:  AB 1250
          Author:   Bloom (D)
          Amended:  9/9/15 in Senate
          Vote:     21  

           SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE:  11-0, 7/14/15
           AYES:  Beall, Cannella, Allen, Bates, Gaines, Galgiani, Leyva,  
            McGuire, Mendoza, Roth, Wieckowski

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE:  7-0, 8/17/15
           AYES:  Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen

           SENATE TRANS. & HOUSING COMMITTEE:  9-0, 9/10/15 (Pursuant to  
            Senate Rule 29.10)
           AYES: Beall, Cannella, Allen, Bates, Gaines, Galgiani, Leyva,  
            Roth, Wieckowski
           NO VOTE RECORDED: McGuire, Mendoza

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  80-0, 4/20/15 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote

           SUBJECT:   Vehicles:  buses:  axle weight


          SOURCE:    California Transit Association
          
          DIGEST:   This bill establishes a declining maximum curb weight  
          per axle for buses.

          ANALYSIS:   


          Existing law:








                                                                    AB 1250 
                                                                    Page  2



          1)Limits the gross weight of buses to 20,500 pounds per axle.

          2)Prohibits California from enforcing a weight limit of less  
            than 24,000 pounds per axle for buses travelling on the  
            federal interstate highway system.

          3)Allows, until January 1, 2016, a public transit system to  
            procure a bus whose weight exceeds 20,500 pounds per axle if  
            1) the new bus weighs less per axle than the bus it is  
            replacing, or 2) the new buses are part of a new fleet class,  
            provided that the governing board of the public transit system  
            makes a finding that the new fleet class is necessary to  
            address a need in a new or existing market.

          4)Prohibits driving a vehicle over a bridge or other structure  
            that is part of a highway when that vehicle weighs more than  
            the bridge or structure can safely support.

          This bill:
           
          1)Establishes a declining maximum curb weight per axle,  
            beginning with procurement solicitations issued after January  
            1, 2016, for standard transit buses of 23,000 pounds,  
            declining to 22,000 pounds by January 1, 2019.  For  
            articulated or zero-emission buses, the maximum curb weight  
            per axle is 25,000 pounds, beginning with procurement  
            solicitations issued after January 1, 2016, declining to  
            22,000 pounds for procurement solicitations issued after  
            January 1, 2022.

          2)Defines curb weight as the weight of the bus including fuel  
            and all equipment used in normal operations but excluding the  
            weight of the driver and passengers.

          3)Exempts buses procured from solicitations issued prior to  
            January 1, 2016 or during option periods in multi-year  
            contracts not exceeding five years, or January 1, 2021,  
            whichever is earlier, from the 20,500 pound-per-axle weight  
            limitation and from the axle weight limitations established in  
            this legislation. 

          4)Prohibits buses exceeding the federal 24,000 pound-per-axle  
            weight limitation from operating on the interstate highway  







                                                                    AB 1250  
                                                                    Page  3


            system.

          5)Requires that if the gross weight of any axle exceeds 20,000  
            pounds, that axle shall have four wheels.

          6)Requires operators employing articulated buses to provide  
            notice to cities and counties in whose jurisdiction those  
            buses are operating of the approximate routes of those buses.

          Comments

          Purpose of bill.  According to the author, transit buses play an  
          integral role in California's transportation infrastructure.   
          While cities, planning agencies, transit agencies, and bus  
          manufacturers do not all agree on the solution for overweight  
          buses, it is essential that transit systems continue to operate,  
          and transit agencies must be allowed to continue to procure  
          transit vehicles if the need arises.  Stakeholders convened with  
          the goal of crafting a long-term solution that works for all  
          parties.  

          The problem.  Overweight vehicles damage roads and bridges,  
          resulting in costly repair bills.  The California Transit  
          Association (CTA) estimates that during peak commute times, as  
          many as half the transit buses exceed the 20,500 pound-per-axle  
          weight limit.  Several years ago some police departments began  
          citing buses for exceeding weight limits.  That practice was  
          halted pursuant to legislation, but the problem persists.  

          An agreement.  This bill represents the result of year-long  
          negotiations between transit operators, local and state  
          governments, and bus manufacturers.  The current version of the  
          bill is the final result of the negotiations.  As a result, the  
          League of California Cities has indicated its support for the  
          bill, the California State Association of Counties is neutral,  
          and Caltrans has provided technical support.

          The time has come.  There have been legislative attempts to deal  
          with overweight buses since 2012, and each has resulted in  
          stop-gap measures which deferred any solution.  In the meantime,  
          more heavy buses have joined the transit fleets, increasing the  
          damage that will inevitably occur as these vehicles use our  
          deteriorating roads and bridges for years to come.  As the state  
          grapples for solutions to funding road maintenance and repair,  







                                                                    AB 1250  
                                                                    Page  4


          it makes little sense to ignore this longstanding problem.

          Non-transportation policies contribute to the problem.   
          California's air pollution and greenhouse gas emission reduction  
          goals have resulted in alternatively fueled powertrains for  
          buses, such as electric and compressed natural gas.  Improving  
          efficiency in transit operations often means using larger buses  
          and optimizing routes so that buses run full.  Both of these  
          policies result in buses which are so heavy that they can damage  
          streets and prematurely wear bridges and overpasses.  As  
          policymakers consider new technologies and efficiency  
          improvements, they'd be wise to also consider the effects of  
          their decisions on the state's transportation infrastructure.   
          Fixing the state's deteriorating roads and bridges is expensive.

          A different standard.  The key metric for this bill is curb  
          weight, which for the purposes of this bill is the total weight  
          of a bus, including maximum fuel and all normal equipment, but  
          excluding the weight of the driver and passengers.  Supporters  
          contend that this is a knowable, consistent, and clear measure.   
          However, this is an unusual metric, as the much more common  
          metric is gross, or actual, weight.  This measures the actual  
          force of the tires, though the gross weight for buses will vary  
          throughout the day as passenger loads rise and fall.  For  
          comparison, a fully occupied bus is as much as one-third heavier  
          than an empty bus.
          
          FISCAL EFFECT:   Appropriation:    No          Fiscal  
          Com.:YesLocal:   Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:  

           Unquantifiable minor to significant impact on pavement  
            maintenance costs as a result of accelerated degradation by  
            allowing the operation of overweight transit buses. (State  
            Highway Account, local funds) 

           Due to the numerous factors that may result in pavement  
            degradation, it is impossible to calculate the isolated  
            impacts and costs associated with the operation of overweight  
            transit buses on state highways and local streets and roads. 


          SUPPORT:   (Verified9/9/10)







                                                                    AB 1250  
                                                                    Page  5




          California Transit Association (source)
          California Association for Coordinated Transportation
          California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
          City of Arcata
          City of Santa Monica
          Orange County Transportation Authority
          Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
          Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District
          Solano County Transit


          OPPOSITION:   (Verified9/9/10)


          None received

          ASSEMBLY FLOOR:  80-0, 4/20/15
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom,  
            Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Campos, Chang,  
            Chau, Chávez, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle,  
            Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina  
            Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gomez, Gonzalez,  
            Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden,  
            Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder,  
            Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina,  
            Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen,  
            Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez,  
            Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting,  
            Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins

          Prepared by:Randy Chinn / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121,  Randy Chinn  
          / T. & H. / (916) 651-4121
          9/10/15 23:17:25


                                   ****  END  ****


          










                                                                    AB 1250  
                                                                    Page  6