BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1266 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 1266 (Gonzalez) As Amended May 4, 2015 Majority vote ------------------------------------------------------------------- |Committee |Votes |Ayes |Noes | | | | | | | | | | | |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------| |Utilities |10-5 |Rendon, Bonilla, |Patterson, Achadjian, | | | |Burke, Eggman, |Dahle, Hadley, | | | |Cristina Garcia, |Obernolte | | | |Roger Hernández, | | | | |Quirk, Santiago, | | | | |Ting, Williams | | | | | | | |----------------+------+--------------------+----------------------| |Appropriations |12-5 |Gomez, Bonta, |Bigelow, Chang, | | | |Calderon, Daly, |Gallagher, Jones, | | | |Eggman, |Wagner | | | | | | | | | | | | | |Eduardo Garcia, | | | | |Gordon, Holden, | | | | |Quirk, Rendon, | | | | |Weber, Wood | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------- AB 1266 Page 2 SUMMARY: Prohibits an electrical or gas corporation from recovering from ratepayers' expenses for excess compensation paid to an officer of the utility following a triggering event, unless approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), as specified. Specifically, this bill: 1)Prohibits an electrical or gas corporation from recovering expenses for excess compensation from ratepayers following a triggering event, unless the utility complies with specific requirements and obtains the approval of the CPUC, as specified. 2)Defines "excess compensation" to mean any salary, bonus, benefits, stock options, or other consideration of any value paid to an officer of an electrical or gas corporation that is in excess of ten times the average compensation paid by the utility to the utility's journeyman linemen. 3)Specifies that a "triggering event" occurs if, after January 1, 2013, an electrical corporation or gas corporation violates a federal or state safety regulation with respect to the plant and facility of the utility and, as a proximate cause of that violation, ratepayers incur a financial responsibility in excess of $5 million. 4)Requires an electrical or gas corporation, prior to paying or seeking recovery of excess compensation following a triggering event, to file a Tier 3 advice letter with the CPUC that includes all of the following: a) The compensation history for the officer, b) The proposed compensation to be paid to the officer, AB 1266 Page 3 including the compensation recovered from ratepayers and that paid solely by shareholders of the utility, c) Any justification for the proposed compensation, and d) Any additional information required by the CPUC. 5)Requires the CPUC to open a proceeding, or expand the scope of an existing proceeding to evaluate the advice letter, and consider the costs to ratepayers of the triggering event, and hold at least one duly noticed public hearing for the proceeding. 6)Requires the CPUC to issue a written decision determining whether and, if so, how much of each officers' compensation shall be recoverable from ratepayers. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, there would be increased CPUC costs of approximately $150,000 over an 18-month period to conduct one proceeding. In addition, there would be ongoing annual CPUC costs of approximately $50,000. COMMENTS: 1)Author's Statement: "Neither shareholders nor ratepayers played any role in the management missteps that led to the multi-billion dollar disaster that the SONGS shutdown has become. To reward top executives for successfully passing the buck to everyday ratepayers and stockholders who are trying to build a secure retirement is inexplicable to me, and should face public scrutiny. " AB 1266 Page 4 2)Background: In 2012, Southern California Edison (SCE) announced that it was closing the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) in San Clemente following the discovery of a radioactive leak caused by a faulty steam generator. In 2014, SCE reached a settlement with the CPUC to allow it to collect $3.3 billion from ratepayers and $1.4 billion from shareholders to fund the cost of the closing SONGS. The settlement also gave ratepayers a share of the money recovered from litigation against Mitsubishi, the manufacturer of the faulty steam generator, as well as an equal share of any legal settlement with Mitsubishi. 3)Executive Compensation: According to the author, "executive compensation is never the subject of a standalone proceeding where the public can engage ? [In addition,] the [CPUC] has never conducted a proceeding to determine if the compensation for any individual is appropriate or justified, and never considers whether the utility's performance warrants any change in executive compensation. Not after the San Bruno disaster or the SONGS disaster, not even after SCE was fined $200 million for falsifying performance records and customer satisfaction surveys." This bill prohibits an electrical or gas corporation from recovering expenses for excess compensation from ratepayers following a triggering event, unless the utility submits to the CPUC a Tier 3 advice letter, as specified, and the CPUC opens or expands the scope of a hearing to consider the costs to ratepayers of the triggering event. The CPUC would have to hold at least one publically noticed hearing to consider the cost to ratepayers of the trigger event, and issue a decision on whether and, if so, how much of each officers' compensation shall be recoverable from ratepayers. Analysis Prepared by: AB 1266 Page 5 Edmond Cheung / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083 FN: 0000622