BILL NUMBER: AB 1276	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  MARCH 26, 2015

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Santiago

                        FEBRUARY 27, 2015

   An act to amend Section  261   1347  of
the Penal Code, relating to  sexual assault  
criminal procedure  .



	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 1276, as amended, Santiago.  Sexual assault. 
 Child witnesses: human trafficking.  
   Existing law authorizes a court in a criminal proceeding, upon
written notice by the prosecutor made at least 3 days prior to the
date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on which the testimony
of the minor is scheduled or during the course of the proceeding on
the court's own motion, to order that the testimony of a minor 13
years of age or younger at the time of the motion be taken by
contemporaneous examination and cross-examination in another place
and out of the presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants,
and attorneys, and communicated to the courtroom by means of
closed-circuit television, if the court makes specified findings. One
of the findings required by existing law requires is that the minor'
s testimony will involve a recitation of the facts of specified
crimes, including an alleged violent felony of which the minor is a
victim.  
   This bill would authorize a minor 17 years of age or younger to
testify by contemporaneous examination and cross-examination if the
testimony will involve the recitation of the facts of an alleged
offense of human trafficking.  
   Existing law establishes various sexual assault offenses,
including the offense of rape. Under existing law, rape is defined as
an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person who is not
the spouse of the perpetrator, under certain circumstances, including
where the act is accomplished against a person's will by means of
force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful
bodily injury on the person or another.  
   This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to the
these provisions. 
   Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no.
State-mandated local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

   SECTION 1.    Section 1347 of the   Penal
Code   is amended to read: 
   1347.  (a) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this
section to provide the court with discretion to employ alternative
court procedures to protect the rights of a child witness, the rights
of the defendant, and the integrity of the judicial process. In
exercising its discretion, the court necessarily will be required to
balance the rights of the defendant or defendants against the need to
protect a child witness and to preserve the integrity of the court's
truthfinding function. This discretion is intended to be used
selectively when the facts and circumstances in the individual case
present compelling evidence of the need to use these alternative
procedures.
   (b) Notwithstanding any other law, the court in any criminal
proceeding, upon written notice by the prosecutor made at least three
days prior to the date of the preliminary hearing or trial date on
which the testimony of the minor is scheduled, or during the course
of the proceeding on the court's own motion, may order that the
testimony of a minor  13   17  years of age
or younger at the time of the motion be taken by contemporaneous
examination and cross-examination in another place and out of the
presence of the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys,
and communicated to the courtroom by means of closed-circuit
television, if the court makes all of the following findings:
   (1) The minor's testimony will involve a recitation of the facts
of any of the following:
   (A) An alleged sexual offense committed on or with the minor.
   (B) An alleged violent felony, as defined in subdivision (c) of
Section 667.5, of which the minor is a victim.
   (C) An alleged felony offense specified in Section 273a or 273d of
which the minor is a victim. 
   (D) An alleged offense of human trafficking, as defined in Section
236.1. 
   (2) The impact on the minor of one or more of the factors
enumerated in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, is shown by clear
and convincing evidence to be so substantial as to make the minor
unavailable as a witness unless closed-circuit testimony is used.
   (A) Testimony by the minor in the presence of the defendant would
result in the child suffering serious emotional distress so that the
child would be unavailable as a witness.
   (B) The defendant used a deadly weapon in the commission of the
offense.
   (C) The defendant threatened serious bodily injury to the child or
the child's family, threatened incarceration or deportation of the
child or a member of the child's family, threatened removal of the
child from the child's family, or threatened the dissolution of the
child's family in order to prevent or dissuade the minor from
attending or giving testimony at any trial or court proceeding, or to
prevent the minor from reporting the alleged sexual offense, or from
assisting in criminal prosecution.
   (D) The defendant inflicted great bodily injury upon the child in
the commission of the offense.
   (E) The defendant or his or her counsel behaved during the hearing
or trial in a way that caused the minor to be unable to continue his
or her testimony.
   In making the determination required by this section, the court
shall consider the age of the minor, the relationship between the
minor and the defendant or defendants, any handicap or disability of
the minor, and the nature of the acts charged. The minor's refusal to
testify shall not alone constitute sufficient evidence that the
special procedure described in this section is necessary to obtain
the minor's testimony.
   (3) The equipment available for use of closed-circuit television
would accurately communicate the image and demeanor of the minor to
the judge, jury, defendant or defendants, and attorneys.
   (c) If the court orders the use of closed-circuit television,
two-way closed-circuit television shall be used, except that if the
impact on the minor of one or more of the factors enumerated in
subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive, of paragraph (2) of subdivision
(b), is shown by clear and convincing evidence to be so substantial
as to make the minor unavailable as a witness even if two-way
closed-circuit television is used, one-way closed-circuit television
may be used. The prosecution shall give the defendant or defendants
at least 30 days' written notice of the prosecution's intent to seek
the use of one-way closed-circuit television, unless good cause is
shown to the court why this 30-day notice requirement should not
apply.
   (d) (1) The hearing on a motion brought pursuant to this section
shall be conducted out of the presence of the jury.
   (2) Notwithstanding Section 804 of the Evidence Code or any other
law, the court, in determining the merits of the motion, shall not
compel the minor to testify at the hearing, nor shall the court deny
the motion on the ground that the minor has not testified.
   (3) In determining whether the impact on an individual child of
one or more of the five factors enumerated in paragraph (2) of
subdivision (b) is so substantial that the minor is unavailable as a
witness unless two-way or one-way closed-circuit television is used,
the court may question the minor in chambers, or at some other
comfortable place other than the courtroom, on the record for a
reasonable period of time with the support person, the prosecutor,
and defense counsel present. The defendant or defendants shall not be
present. The court shall conduct the questioning of the minor and
shall not permit the prosecutor or defense counsel to examine the
minor. The prosecutor and defense counsel shall be permitted to
submit proposed questions to the court prior to the session in
chambers. Defense counsel shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity
to consult with the defendant or defendants prior to the conclusion
of the session in chambers.
   (e) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in
another place outside of the courtroom, the court shall do all of the
following:
   (1) Make a brief statement on the record, outside of the presence
of the jury, of the reasons in support of its order. While the
statement need not include traditional findings of fact, the reasons
shall be set forth with sufficient specificity to permit meaningful
review and to demonstrate that discretion was exercised in a careful,
reasonable, and equitable manner.
   (2) Instruct the members of the jury that they are to draw no
inferences from the use of closed-circuit television as a means of
facilitating the testimony of the minor.
   (3) Instruct respective counsel, outside of the presence of the
jury, that they are to make no comment during the course of the trial
on the use of closed-circuit television procedures.
   (4) Instruct the support witness, outside of the presence of the
jury, that he or she is not to coach, cue, or in any way influence or
attempt to influence the testimony of the minor.
   (5) Order that a complete record of the examination of the minor,
including the images and voices of all persons who in any way
participate in the examination, be made and preserved as a video
recording in addition to being stenographically recorded. The video
recording shall be transmitted to the clerk of the court in which the
action is pending and shall be made available for viewing to the
prosecuting attorney, the defendant or defendants, and his or her
attorney during ordinary business hours. The video recording shall be
destroyed after five years have elapsed from the date of entry of
judgment. If an appeal is filed, the video recording shall not be
destroyed until a final judgment on appeal has been ordered. A video
recording that is taken pursuant to this section is subject to a
protective order of the court for the purpose of protecting the
privacy of the witness. This subdivision does not affect the
provisions of subdivision (b) of Section 868.7.
   (f) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in
another place outside the courtroom, only the minor, a support person
designated pursuant to Section 868.5, a nonuniformed bailiff, any
technicians necessary to operate the closed-circuit equipment, and,
after consultation with the prosecution and the defense, a
representative appointed by the court, shall be physically present
for the testimony. A video recording device shall record the image of
the minor and his or her testimony, and a separate video recording
device shall record the image of the support person.
   (g) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in
another place outside the courtroom, the minor shall be brought into
the judge's chambers prior to the taking of his or her testimony to
meet for a reasonable period of time with the judge, the prosecutor,
and defense counsel. A support person for the minor shall also be
present. This meeting shall be for the purpose of explaining the
court process to the child and to allow the attorneys an opportunity
to establish rapport with the child to facilitate later questioning
by closed-circuit television. No participant shall discuss the
defendant or defendants or any of the facts of the case with the
minor during this meeting.
   (h) When the court orders the testimony of a minor to be taken in
another place outside the courtroom, nothing in this section
prohibits the court from ordering the minor to be brought into the
courtroom for a limited purpose, including the identification of the
defendant or defendants as the court deems necessary.
   (i) The examination shall be under oath, and the defendant or
defendants shall be able to see and hear the minor witness, and if
two-way closed-circuit television is used, the defendant's image
shall be transmitted live to the witness.
   (j) Nothing in this section affects the disqualification of
witnesses pursuant to Section 701 of the Evidence Code.
   (k) The cost of examination by contemporaneous closed-circuit
television ordered pursuant to this section shall be borne by the
court out of its existing budget.
   (l) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a
defendant from being represented by counsel during any closed-circuit
testimony. 
  SECTION 1.    Section 261 of the Penal Code is
amended to read:
   261.  (a) Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a
person who is not the spouse of the perpetrator, under any of the
following circumstances:
   (1) Where a person is incapable, because of a mental disorder or
developmental or physical disability, of giving legal consent, and
this is known or reasonably should be known to the person committing
the act. Notwithstanding the existence of a conservatorship pursuant
to the provisions of the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Part 1
(commencing with Section 5000) of Division 5 of the Welfare and
Institutions Code), the prosecuting attorney shall prove, as an
element of the crime, that a mental disorder or developmental or
physical disability rendered the alleged victim incapable of giving
consent.
   (2) Where it is accomplished against a person's will by means of
force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful
bodily injury on the person or another.
   (3) Where a person is prevented from resisting by any intoxicating
or anesthetic substance, or any controlled substance, and this
condition was known, or reasonably should have been known by the
accused.
   (4) Where a person is at the time unconscious of the nature of the
act, and this is known to the accused. As used in this paragraph,
"unconscious of the nature of the act" means incapable of resisting
because the victim meets any one of the following conditions:
   (A) Was unconscious or asleep.
   (B) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant that the act
occurred.
   (C) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the
essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's fraud
in fact.
   (D) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the
essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's
fraudulent representation that the sexual penetration served a
professional purpose when it served no professional purpose.
   (5) Where a person submits under the belief that the person
committing the act is someone known to the victim other than the
accused, and this belief is induced by any artifice, pretense, or
concealment practiced by the accused, with intent to induce the
belief.
   (6) Where the act is accomplished against the victim's will by
threatening to retaliate in the future against the victim or any
other person, and there is a reasonable possibility that the
perpetrator will execute the threat. As used in this paragraph,
"threatening to retaliate" means a threat to kidnap, falsely
imprison, or inflict extreme pain, serious bodily injury, or death.
   (7) Where the act is accomplished against the victim's will by
threatening to use the authority of a public official to incarcerate,
arrest, or deport the victim or another, and the victim has a
reasonable belief that the perpetrator is a public official. As used
in this paragraph, "public official" means a person employed by a
governmental agency who has the authority, as part of that position,
to incarcerate, arrest, or deport another. The perpetrator does not
actually have to be a public official.
   (b) As used in this section, "duress" means a direct or implied
threat of force, violence, danger, or retribution sufficient to
coerce a reasonable person of ordinary susceptibilities to perform an
act that otherwise would not have been performed, or acquiesce in an
act to which one otherwise would not have submitted. The total
circumstances, including the age of the victim, and his or her
relationship to the defendant, are factors to consider in appraising
the existence of duress.
   (c) As used in this section, "menace" means any threat,
declaration, or act which shows an intention to inflict an injury
upon another.