BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1292| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 1292 Author: Dababneh (D) Introduced:2/27/15 Vote: 21 SENATE BANKING & F.I. COMMITTEE: 7-0, 6/17/15 AYES: Block, Vidak, Galgiani, Hall, Hueso, Lara, Morrell SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE: 7-0, 8/27/15 AYES: Lara, Bates, Beall, Hill, Leyva, Mendoza, Nielsen ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 77-0, 4/30/15 (Consent) - See last page for vote SUBJECT: Bank on California program SOURCE: Author DIGEST: This bill establishes the Bank on California Program within the Department of Business Oversight (DBO) and requires DBO to report annually to the chairpersons of the Senate Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions and Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance regarding the activities of the Bank On California Program. ANALYSIS: Existing law: AB 1292 Page 2 1)Authorizes DBO to administer provisions of the Financial Code regulating the activities of state-chartered banks and state-chartered credit unions (Divisions 1 and 5 of the Financial Code). 2)Provides for the California Financial Literacy Fund, administered by the State Controller, to enable partnerships with the financial services community and governmental and nongovernmental stakeholders to improve Californians' financial literacy (Financial Code Section 70000 et seq.). This bill: 1)Contains findings and declarations stating that "Bank On California" is a voluntary collaborative initiative that assists Californians in opening a bank or credit union account and saving for the future. 2)Establishes the Bank on California Program within DBO. 3)Requires, beginning in 2016, DBO to provide the respective chairpersons of the Senate Committee on Banking and Financial Institutions and the Assembly Committee on Banking and Finance with a brief annual summary on the activities of the program no later than August 30th of each year. Background "Bank On" programs are voluntary programs in which local agencies, typically municipalities and community partners, form coalitions with banks and credit unions to reduce barriers to banking among unbanked and underbanked individuals. The first Bank On program was created in San Francisco in 2005, in response to a survey that identified approximately 50,000 unbanked households in that jurisdiction, many of which housed people of color. When San Francisco officials reviewed the data, they determined that San Francisco had a compelling interest in helping the unbanked open accounts, as a first step toward financial empowerment and a stronger community. In December 2005, a committee including the San Francisco AB 1292 Page 3 Treasurer's Office, the New America Foundation, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, and the nonprofit organization EARN worked with local community organizations, banks, and credit unions to develop a new program to bank the unbanked. This coalition eventually became Bank on San Francisco. It began with four goals: 1) create more opportunities for lower-income clients to enter the financial mainstream; 2) create products without high fees or minimum balances; 3) help unbanked people learn about the benefits of keeping their money in checking and savings accounts; and 4) help San Franciscans learn more about how to use, manage, and save money. Bank on San Francisco ultimately partnered with 14 banks and credit unions. The group set an initial goal of banking 10,000 unbanked San Franciscans in two years. Results to date have been strong. Bank On San Francisco has helped bank an average of 10,000 people per year since launch (http://sfofe.org/programs/bank-on). According to the San Francisco Office of Financial Empowerment (OFE), Bank on San Francisco is the first comprehensive program in the United States dedicated to helping people without access to mainstream financial institutions. It has become a model for similar programs across the nation. In 2008, the Schwarzenegger Administration launched Bank On California, to build on Bank On San Francisco, and encourage other local governments to launch and maintain regional "Bank On" programs of their own. Initially, Bank On California was housed within the Governor's Office of Planning and Research. A few years later, Bank On California was shifted to the State and Consumer Services Agency. In 2012, the program was moved to the Department of Financial Institutions (DFI), then moved to DBO in 2013, when DBO was formed through the merger of DFI and the Department of Corporations. To date, within California, Bank On Programs have been established in American Canyon, the Central Coast (including Monterey, Santa Cruz, Salinas, and San Benito Counties), Fresno, Los Angeles, Oakland, Orange County, Napa Valley, Sacramento (including Sacramento, Amador, El Dorado, Placer, and Yolo Counties), San Francisco, San Jose, and Stanislaus (www.bankoncalifornia.ca.gov). Comments AB 1292 Page 4 If this bill is enacted, DBO would join the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the National League of Cities as a repository of information about state and regional Bank On programs. According to the San Francisco OFE, "Bank On San Francisco's success attracted national attention. To help other cities start their own programs, the National League of Cities created "Bank on Cities" and the U.S. Department of the Treasury has begun work on a national "Bank on USA" program. More than 100 cities have launched, or started planning, a Bank On program. To provide technical assistance to support these efforts, the San Francisco OFE partnered with the National League of Cities and the James Irvine Foundation to create joinbankon.org, a web portal offering tools and resources for other cities planning Bank On programs." A significant amount of information about the philosophy behind Bank On, how to find an existing Bank On program, and how to start a new Bank On program is available at www.joinbankon.org. Prior Legislation AB 385 (Dickinson, 2013) would have housed the Bank On California Program within DBO, required DBO to coordinate with regional Bank On programs, and required financial institutions that chose to participate in Bank On California to adhere to several rules. AB 385 was held on the Senate Appropriations Committee Suspense File. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.:YesLocal: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill will impose minor to potentially significant cost pressure on the Financial Institutions Fund, potentially in excess of $150,000 annually for DBO to provide general oversight and support of the Bank on California Program and prepare the report required by the bill. SUPPORT: (Verified8/27/15) California Credit Union League AB 1292 Page 5 California Independent Bankers San Francisco Office of Financial Empowerment United Ways of California OPPOSITION: (Verified8/27/15) None received ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: The California Independent Bankers (CIB), California Credit Union League (CCUL), and the San Francisco OFE support the bill. CCUL believes that too many Californians are disconnected from the financial mainstream. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation survey data indicates that 3.1 million adults are unbanked, and 6.6 million are unbanked in California. Recent market research indicates that Fresno and Los Angeles, respectively, have the highest and third highest percentages of unbanked residents in the country. CCUL supports AB 1292, because it "intends to increase and enhance banking services in underserved communities and stimulate greater financial inclusion by identifying areas that need expanded service." CIB writes, "With millions of Americans unbanked and underbanked (1 in 13 households in 2013), it is critical to take steps to help these individuals gain access to financial services, including checking and savings accounts." The San Francisco OFE believes that the most successful model for Bank On is one in which regional coalitions lead and state agencies provide needed support and coordination. ASSEMBLY FLOOR: 77-0, 4/30/15 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Travis Allen, Baker, Bigelow, Bloom, Bonilla, Bonta, Brough, Brown, Burke, Calderon, Chang, Chau, Chiu, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dababneh, Dahle, Daly, Dodd, Eggman, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gatto, Gipson, Gonzalez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hadley, Harper, Roger Hernández, Holden, Irwin, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Kim, Lackey, Levine, Linder, Lopez, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Melendez, Mullin, Nazarian, Obernolte, O'Donnell, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, Quirk, Rendon, Ridley-Thomas, Rodriguez, Salas, Santiago, Steinorth, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, AB 1292 Page 6 Wilk, Williams, Wood, Atkins NO VOTE RECORDED: Campos, Chávez, Gomez Prepared by:Eileen Newhall / B. & F.I. / (916) 651-4102 8/31/15 9:05:54 **** END ****