BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1299 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 27, 2015 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Jimmy Gomez, Chair AB 1299 (Ridley-Thomas) - As Amended April 21, 2015 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Policy |Human Services |Vote:|7 - 0 | |Committee: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | |Health | |19 - 0 | | | | | | | | | | | |-------------+-------------------------------+-----+-------------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: NoReimbursable: No SUMMARY: This bill would shift responsibility for the provision of medically necessary mental health services for foster youth placed out-of-county, from the county of original jurisdiction to the foster youth's county of residence, in order to increase AB 1299 Page 2 access to mental health services for youth. FISCAL EFFECT: Annual increased costs in the medical Early Periodic Screening Treatment and Diagnosis Program (EPSDT) in the low millions (approx 50% GF), possibly more to the extent this bill increases access to mental health services for youth who face treatment and service barriers when placed out-of-county. COMMENTS: 1)Purpose. This bill moves responsibility for the provision of mental health services for foster youth from the county-of-origin to the host county. The author indicates current law arrangements result in treatment delays and denials when a child is placed out-of-county and the host county must recover mental health funding from the county from which the child was removed. 2)Background. There are indications that out-of-county foster youth may have higher needs and less access to mental health care. A 2011 report issued by the California Child Welfare Council found that out-of-county foster youth were more likely to have been diagnosed with a serious mental health disorder, yet were 10% to 15% less likely to have received any mental health services compared to their in-county peers. And among those that did receive services, in-county foster youth fared better, receiving more care and more intensive treatment. As of July 2014, nearly 20% of foster children (13,000) were considered out-of-county. The Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (EPSDT), is a federally-mandated benefit under Medi-Cal. States must provide medically necessary services to AB 1299 Page 3 specified children. If a physician screening determines a child needs additional treatment, Medi-Cal must provide the services according the federal mandate. EPSDT is the source of funding for a majority of mental health treatment for children in foster care. Mental health services provided to foster youth include outpatient services, medication support, behavioral therapy, and 24-hour care. 3)Prior Legislation. a) AB 1808 (Galgiani) of 2009 was substantially similar to this bill. AB 1808 was held on this Committee's Suspense File. b) SB 785 (Steinberg), Chapter 469, Statutes of 2007, required the California Department of Mental Health to create standardized contracts, forms, and procedures to facilitate the receipt of medically necessary specialty mental health services to foster youth in out-of-county placements. Analysis Prepared by:Jennifer Swenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081 AB 1299 Page 4