BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 1299 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 1299 (Ridley-Thomas) As Amended August 18, 2016 Majority vote -------------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |80-0 |(June 1, 2015) |SENATE: |39-0 |(August 23, | | | | | | |2016) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: HUM. S. SUMMARY: Provides for the presumptive transfer of responsibility from the county of original jurisdiction to the foster child's county of residence for providing or arranging mental health services for foster youth, as specified. The Senate amendments: 1)Move provisions of the bill to a different section of the Welfare and Institutions Code. 2)Delete provisions requiring, as specified, presumptive transfer to occur immediately when a foster child is placed in a county other than the county of original jurisdiction and AB 1299 Page 2 when the request for transfer of responsibility is made by specified entities or individuals, and instead require transfer to take place promptly when either of the following conditions exist: a) A foster child is placed in a county other than the county of original jurisdiction on or after July 1, 2017; or b) A foster youth who resides in a county other than the county of original jurisdiction after June 30, 2017, and is not receiving specialty mental health services, as specified, requests transfer of responsibility. 3)Require a foster youth who resided in a county other than the county of original jurisdiction after June 30, 2017, and who continues to reside outside the county of original jurisdiction after December 31, 2017, to have jurisdiction transferred no later than the child's first regularly scheduled status review hearing, as specified. 4)Delete provisions requiring the California Health and Human Services Agency (HHS) to coordinate with the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and the Department of Social Services (DSS) to take specified actions regarding establishing presumptive transfer by July 1, 2016, and instead, require HHS to coordinate with DHCS and DSS to, by July 1, 2017, have DHCS issue policy guidance concerning the conditions for and exceptions to presumptive transfer, as specified, in consultation with specified parties, and that ensures that certain conditions are met, including, but not limited to, presumptive transfer not interrupting the continuity of care. 5)Provide for conditions under which presumptive transfer made be waived, and establish related requirements and processes, as specified. AB 1299 Page 3 6)Require a county in which a foster child resides to accept an assessment of needed services for that child completed in the county of original jurisdiction and further, authorize the county in which a child resides to conduct additional assessments, as specified. 7)Require a county in which a child resides to assume responsibility for the authorization and provision of specialty mental health services and payments for services upon presumptive transfer. 8)Require a foster child transferred to the mental health plan in the county in which the child resides to be considered part of the county of residence caseload for claiming purposes from the Behavioral Health Subaccount and the Behavioral Health Services Growth Special Account, as specified. 9)Require DSS and DHCS to adopt regulations to implement the provisions of this bill by July 1, 2019, and further, authorize DSS and DHCS to implement and administer the changes made by this bill through all-county letters, information notices, or similar written instruction, as specified, until regulations are adopted. 10)Modify requirements related to DHCS seeking federal approval for implementation of the provisions of this bill by: a) Maintaining that, if DHCS determines it necessary, it shall seek approval from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), but removing the requirement that approval be sought specifically under the state's Section 1915(b) Medicaid waiver; b) Moving the deadline by which approval must be sought AB 1299 Page 4 from CMS from not later than July 1, 2016, to no later than January 1, 2017; c) Removing the requirement that DHCS do everything within its power necessary to secure an expeditious approval from CMS; and d) Removing the statement that DHCS shall not be required to implement any provision of the bill that CMS determines is not permitted under the state's waiver and, instead, requiring the provisions of this bill to be implemented only if and to the extent that federal financial participation, as specified, is available and all necessary federal approvals have been obtained. 11)Make technical amendments. EXISTING LAW: 1)Establishes a state and local system of child welfare services, including foster care, for children who have been adjudged by the court to have been abused or neglected, or at risk of abuse or neglect, as specified. (Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) Section 202) 2)States that the purpose of foster care law is to provide maximum safety and protection for children who are currently being physically, sexually, or emotionally abused, neglected, or exploited, and to ensure the safety, protection, and physical and emotional well-being of children who are at risk of harm. (WIC Section 300.2) 3)Establishes rights of foster children, including the right to receive medical, dental, vision, and mental health services. (WIC Section 16001.9) AB 1299 Page 5 4)Establishes the federal Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program to provide comprehensive and preventive health services, including preventive, dental, mental health, and developmental, and specialty services, to Medicaid beneficiaries under the age of 21. Requires states to administer EPSDT as a condition of receiving federal Medicaid funds. (42 United States Code Section 1396(d)) 5)Requires county mental health departments that receive full system of care funding, as specified, to provide children served by county social services and probation departments mental health screening, assessment, participation in multidisciplinary placement teams and specialty mental health treatment services for children placed out of home in group care, for those children who meet the definition of medical necessity, to the extent resources are necessary. (WIC Section 5867.5) 6)Requires each local mental health plan to establish a procedure to ensure access to outpatient specialty mental health services, as required by EPSDT program standards, for any child in foster care who has been placed outside his or her county of adjudication. (WIC Section 14716). 7)Establishes the Behavioral Health Subaccount within the Support Services Account. (Government Code Section 30025) FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown. COMMENTS: Mental health needs of foster youth: Foster youth have a higher likelihood of experiencing emotional, behavioral, and AB 1299 Page 6 developmental problems when compared to their non-foster peers. Abuse and neglect and unstable placements can contribute to, and exacerbate, mental health issues. These problems, in turn, can lead to other problems, like difficulty forming stable relationships and succeeding in school. Research underscores the need for improved access to health and mental health services for foster children and youth, and points to the high incidence of behavioral or mental health problems necessitating intervention among foster youth. The disproportionately high rates of emotional and behavioral health issues for youth placed in foster care, youth transitioning from foster care, and former foster youth can be correlated with other barriers foster youth face (such as higher rates of incarceration and homelessness and diminished rates of high school completion and college attendance). EPSDT: One in three children under the age of six in the United States is eligible for Medicaid. EPSDT is Medicaid's child health component. Federal law requires a comprehensive set of benefits and services to be provided to children and youth under the age of 21 through Medicaid. On top of the standard benefits that Medi-Cal beneficiaries receive, children and youth are eligible for additional medically necessary services. Mental health services are recognized as an important component of children's health care. Comprehensive well-child examinations including screening services through EPSDT, and screening for potential developmental, mental, behavioral, and/or substance use disorders are required by federal law. Need for this bill: According to the author, foster children are three to six times more likely to experience emotional, behavioral, and developmental problems compared to non-foster children. When these mental health needs go unmet, placement instability, disruptions in permanency plans, barriers to educational attainment, and other consequences can result. Youth dubbed "out-of-county" have been placed in a county other AB 1299 Page 7 than the one in which they originally enter foster care (i.e., the "county of original jurisdiction"). The author reports that, as of July 2014, close to 20% of foster children (13,000) were considered "out-of-county." "Out-of-county" foster youth may be placed at greater risk because of lengthy delays or denials in accessing mental health services that can result from the way the system of care provision currently operates. This is because, when a youth in foster care is placed out of county, the county of original jurisdiction remains responsible for providing or arranging for necessary medical and mental health treatment for that youth. Mental health services - "Specialty Mental Health Medi-Cal" - are separate from other medical services and each county's mental health plan must authorize and provide payment for the mental health services received by the child. There are indications that out-of-county foster youth may have higher needs and less access when it comes to mental health care. A 2011 report issued by the California Child Welfare Council found that out-of-county foster youth were more likely to have been diagnosed with a serious mental health disorder, yet were 10% to 15% less likely to have received any mental health services compared to their in-county peers. And among those that did receive services, in-county foster youth fared better, receiving more care and more intensive treatment. Analysis Prepared by: Daphne Hunt / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089 FN: 0004753